It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CoolBlackHole
Big kudos to Golden Fleece. He is one of the most courageous truth fighters on ATS. I love you buddy!
One small addition: Many ATS “debunkers” and “everything-deniers” are not Government debunkers, but secret society members or affiliates. Which isn’t basically different. Whether you support gruelling NWO agendas because you’re paid to do it or because you’re member/affiliate of secret societies that support the same agendas doesn’t really make a big difference.
[edit on 29-11-2009 by CoolBlackHole]
Originally posted by RipCurl
I for one would like one of you guys to provide proof that there are paid members here by the govt.
What is funny about OS believers is you actually fall for the OS nonsense that you were told and now believe it comes from your "gut instinct."
No. I believe the EVIDENCE and FACT based conclusions in the various reports based on the fact they were WRITTEN by respectable people in their fields of expertise, SPENT years researching and testing, and had their WORK peer reviewed.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
–Structural engineer Dennis Kollar says, “For me the most convincing aspect that the 911 collapse was a controlled demolition is the recorded explosions on the 9/11 Eyewitness DVD.” (talking about the wind on the microphone in Hoboken)
Craig Carlsen, 9110505
I guess about three minutes later you just heard explosions coming from building two, the south tower. It seemed like it took forever, but there were about ten explosions.
Originally posted by impressme
Like the proven lies of NIST or the proven lies of the 911 commission report?
You mean those respectable “underhanded” people in their fields of expertise. These people have been confronted by experts in their fields and have shown them proof that they are sadly wrong. Don’t tell me you do not know about these factual reports?
Here if you really don’t I will gladly help you.
www.ae911truth.org...
www.pilotsfor911truth.org...
If you want to believe in a fairytale, that is your business but, PLEASE do not defend a proven lie to me.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
When watching "9/11 Eyewitness", over a period of several minutes before the south tower collapses you can hear a series of 9 to 10 large explosions.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by ImAPepper
–Structural engineer Dennis Kollar says, “For me the most convincing aspect that the 911 collapse was a controlled demolition is the recorded explosions on the 9/11 Eyewitness DVD.” (talking about the wind on the microphone in Hoboken)
You're way off topic, but I have to respond to the bolded part above. The part I've bolded shows how desperate debunkers are that they have to make such egregious things up out of thin air to explain away the facts and evidence so that they may remain in denial.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Post the video.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
What, you don't know how to spend 5 seconds on Google?
Originally posted by RipCurl
the hoboken mic? over 2 miles away, picked up a so called explosion (it was wind noise by the way) yet cameras AT The scene by news crews and the like PICKED up nothing. They were less than 2 miles away.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by RipCurl
the hoboken mic? over 2 miles away, picked up a so called explosion (it was wind noise by the way) yet cameras AT The scene by news crews and the like PICKED up nothing. They were less than 2 miles away.
Do you actually believe what you typed? How can you type purposeful disinformation and sleep at night?
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
If you only knew how absurd and ridiculous your claims sound. All made up to explain away real facts from video evidence and witness testimony.
[edit on 29-11-2009 by _BoneZ_]
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
I love how people say things like "I have done a lot of research into this subject" without actually doing thier own.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
I am to this day still credited by CNN for some of my research. What about you?
Originally posted by jthomas
There's nothing like illustrating my point that you are quite incapable of providing any positive evidence of "explosives."