It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We, the US don't want Iran to have The Bomb because they will use it to take over the world. Oil or not, perhaps we should nuke them all to hell Now. Forget sanctions. They do not work.
Thats what the Old USA would do.. the USA that stood for the USA an not a new world order. Now, we will not nuke Iran back to hell because it's not politically correct! If navy Seals cant even punch a known terrorist in the face for his murders, then how are we going to defend this country when Iran decides to send a nuke our way?..
Obama has already said he wants this nation defenseless. I think he plans to let Iran Nuke us in exchange for Iran and China taking over the USA thinking they will set him up as dictator to rule in their stead. - as crazy as that sounds.. I never thought I'd ever see a US president and congress sell us out to socialism! Anything can happen in today's crazy world!
Heck, I say we Nuke the UN in New York first - get those traitors off our soil, then nuke Iran.
Iran's formal notification to the IAEA of the planned construction of the backup fuel-rod facility underscores that Iran is playing by the rules of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which Iran has signed.
Iran allows IAEA inspections of all its facilities.
The IAEA and all 16 United States Intelligence Agencies are unanimous in agreement that Iran is not building and does not possess nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by Curio
Why isn't this story being starred and flagged to death
The gloves just came off. The talking is over. Israel and US are probably making arrangements as we speak. Iran must know what's coming.....unless they know something we don't.
Originally posted by December_Rain
It's apparent you want Israel to sit on shoulder of USA and war with Iran....but it ain't gonna happen. Israel can go and fight it's own war if they are so itchy and be ready for consequences.
Originally posted by daveyp1986
This is quite a scary prospect. Iran seem to interested in causing a world wide political stir than anything else at the minute. I can appreciate that they want to be taken seriously by the west, but this just seems ridiculous! This will simply alienate them from the further and creasting more friction. Personally I believe this is one step closer to World War 3.
I shall edit when other sources are available.
news.sky.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Xeven
It all really depends on what Iran's true motives are. Will they destroy Israel if they get Nukes? Will they use them to try and force their Religion on the rest of the world?
That are our fears and Iran's leaders only stoke those fears and never try to eliminate them.
What on earth are they thinking? They seem to be unable or unwilling to live and let live and I mean the leaders not the people. Of course the same can be said for the US under Bush but thank god he is gone.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Heck, I say we Nuke the UN in New York first - get those traitors off our soil, then nuke Iran.
[edit on 29-11-2009 by JohnPhoenix]
Originally posted by minkey53
EVERYBODY take a BIG step back here for one minute!
Why do Iran need or want Nuclear Power when they have enough oil to last them maybe at least another 100 years??
I have a company car with my fuel paid for so why would I put some in and pay for it myself, durh?
First, it is important to bear in mind that Iran's nuclear history pre-dates the current Islamic government. It originated in the mid-1970's, when the Shah unveiled plans to purchase several nuclear reactors from Germany, France and the United States to generate electricity. With Washington's blessing, the Shah's government awarded a contract to a subsidiary of the German company Siemens to construct two 1,200-megawatt reactors at Bushehr.
A study by the Stanford Research Institute concluded that Iran would need, by the year 1990, an electrical capacity of about 20,000 megawatts. The first cadre of Iran's nuclear engineers was trained at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In recognition of Iran's energy needs, the final draft of the U.S.-Iran Nuclear Energy Agreement was signed in July 1978 — several months before the Islamic revolution.
Second, Iran's present electrical requirements are far larger than had been predicted. With an annual growth of 6 percent to 8 percent in demand for electricity and a population estimated to reach 100 million by 2025, Iran cannot possibly rely exclusively on oil and gas. The aging oil industry, denied substantial foreign investment largely because of American sanctions, has not been able even to reach the pre-revolution production level of 5.5 million barrels per day. Of Iran's 60 major oil fields, 57 need major repairs, upgrading and repressurizing, which would require $40 billion over 15 years. Iran's current production level of 3.5 million barrels per day is increasingly geared toward domestic consumption, which has grown by more than 280 percent since 1979. If this trend continues, Iran will become a net oil importer by 2010, a catastrophe for a country that relies on oil for 80 percent of its foreign currency and 45 percent of its annual budget.
Third, opponents of Iran's nuclear program often argue that Iran should opt for the more economically efficient electricity from natural gas-fired power plants. Such arguments are also not valid. A recent study by two MIT professors indicated that the cost of producing electricity from gas (and oil) is comparable with what it costs to generate it using nuclear reactors — not to mention the adverse effects of carbon emissions or the need to preserve Iran's gas reserves to position Iran in 20 or 30 years as one of the main suppliers of gas to Europe and Asia.
Fourth, why should Iran deplete its nonrenewable oil and gas sources when it can, much like the energy-rich United States and Russia, resort to renewable nuclear energy? Nuclear reactors have their problems, and they will not resolve Iran's chronic shortage of electricity. Yet they represent an important first step in diversifying Iran's sources for energy.