posted on Nov, 29 2009 @ 01:46 PM
reply to post by JoshNorton
Sorry but its a conflict of interest, common sense and logic is all that is needed to work that out.
"What, and asking an arbitrary subclass of people to register their identities with the government isn't offensive?"
No offense intended at all, personally I dont feel a Judge should be a Freemason at all due to a conflict of interest. I think that a Judge has a
position to uphold the law fairly and justly without any outside influence. That cannot happen when he is a Freemason, because if faced with a Mason
or family member he has to offer "aid and protection" was it? Oh but the law of the land comes first does it?
As I said first hand experience, and no I am not a criminal in any way shape or form. But I do know a criminal that walked away laughing, but you know
how it goes don't ya brother
Oh and of course you help non Mason's just not as much I would suggest based on your own publication, I might be out of line with that but a ten
second look on the internet found something. But hey you like to paint a picture, so can I
And I quote:- "The Housing Corporation would not allow MCH to restrict its residents to those qualified through Freemasonry, and at present well
under half the residents have had no previous connection with the Craft."
Would NOT allow, which would suggest that was the aim then which was refused.
Masonic Housing Association
I gotta keep away from these Masonic threads, puts me right off my dinner
PS: Oh and OP, if you have anything more to do with this group then you are actually the one showing a lack of honour to your good lady. The fact that
you now state you would even consider going back means the brotherhood is more important than honour. A point I have been trying to make so thanks for
that. If it had been me, I would have got up and walked out and never given them a second thought again.
[edit on 29-11-2009 by Bunker or Bust]