reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I could not agree with you more.
Thank you!
It's rehashed marxism. I spent enough time on the ZM boards to understand that it anti-democratic. It wants scientists to form an elite who decides
what we can have. And this notion of robots doing all our jobs for us so we can writw poetry and play lutes all day is just silly.
I'm an acupuncturist. It requires extreme sensitivity in the fingertips. An ability to connect with subtle aspects of a person's behavior, and the
ability to think creatively - the ability to see patterns of a non-linear nature. In many ways, it is more of an art than a science. No, it will
never be done by a robot - not well, at least.
And my wife - she a behavioral therapist for children with autism. There's no way on earth a robot is going to teach kids with compromised social
skills to better connect with other human beings. In fact, it would be antithetical by its very nature.
No, the idea is not grounded in reality.
I have personally tried to communicate with JF, and he won't return my emails, where all that I asked for, was the data that supported his ideas
about abundance.
Bo, no data, and I've scoured their available literature. Yet, there are plenty of chances to click on a big yellow button so that you can give them
money. Isn't that awesome?
Interesting observation on the NWO overlap. Theit schtick very much resembles the Club of Rome publication, 'The First Global Revolution', in which
it is posited that due to problems with the environment (the parallel would be, resource management/ scarcity), we need a global authority - because
democracy has failed us.
They both have an end game of a communist style dictatorship, in essence.
It's poison to the mind, and the 'believers' are as brainwashed and impervious to criticism as any other cult. In fact, if you try to critique the
movie on their boards, you get rpidly 'thumbed down' by the community, and then when you get a certain number of thumbs, you're banned. Admin will
harass you along the way, and try to get you to quit it. Which is ironic, considering how PJ says that he welcomes criticisms as a way to learn and
grow.
They're completely FOS.
Avoid them like the plague, people. They're not on your side. At best, PJ is a demagogue, in it for the attention. At worst, they are working to
subvert a rising populism, and use it for their own bizzare ends of a technocratic authoritarian state.
Bad stuff.