U.S. Tries New Tack Against Taliban, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 28-11-2009 @ 02:39 AM by plumranch

U.S. Tries New Tack Against Taliban


www.foxnews.com
The U.S.-led coalition and the Afghan government are launching an initiative to persuade Taliban insurgents to lay down their weapons, offering jobs and protection to the militants who choose to abandon their fight.

While President Hamid Karzai's government has been trying to woo these insurgents for years, the new program marks the first time that the U.S.-led North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces are systematically reaching out to Taliban fighters.
(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
US to pay Taliban to switch sides


reply posted on 28-11-2009 @ 03:56 AM by Common Good
reply to post by Zosynspiracy



Im glad I am not the only one who sees this as pathetic.
Everytime I hear the phrase "We Do Not Negotiate With Terrorists" on T.V now, I am just going to laugh.

"hey bro, I really dont like when you shoot at ourpeople,so heres a deal, I will give you 10 bucks in return for your battle rifle, how does that sound?".......BANG! Allah Akbar~!


reply posted on 28-11-2009 @ 08:54 AM by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Education and economic opportunity will go a long way towards easing the socioeconomic conditions that lead to wars of principles.

Conversely I am sure there would less U.S. Soldiers fighting if there were more economic opportunities presently in the U.S.

Interestingly enough jobs aren't truly that hard to create evidently when the government truly wants to create them even in remote Afghanistan

The politics of wars of principles are harder to overcome and the thinly veiled wars of Muslim Attrition for dubious purposes are definately bad politics.

Our bad foreign policy in waging these wars for vague reasons plays into the bad politics of the Taliban who it only becomes easier to recruit for because of the socioeconomic conditions in a dirt poor country like Afghanistan.

The politics of religion are hard to overcome as the Christian neoconservatives and the Zionists especially very much have a religious Crusade of their own based on a religious fear that an Islamic Jihad Movement in the East is on the rise.

Most of that is based on the government skillfully using emotional transference to make broad swaths of the Islamic world guilty by religious association of the alleged crimes of 19 never tried let alone convicted Saudi Hijackers that were reported to be the perpetrators of 9-11.

While its made a vague war whose only semi presentable goals to the public is Muslim Attrition since it's doubtful Americans would have committed so much of their growing 11 trillion dollar debt in fighting these wars to building an oil pipeline for Royal Dutch Shell, increasing the opium crop 90 fold and leasing huge copper deposits to the Chinese, it very much appears to be a war of Muslim Attrition to the Muslims too which makes the Taliban's calls for crushing the invading Crusaders all the more powerful.

Ultimately there are a lot of good reasons why Afghanis would and in fact do fight to rid their nation of foreign invaders.

There aren't really any good reasons as to why we are spending trillions of dollars we don't have and have to borrow to effectively kill more non-combatants in Afghanistan than actual combatants.

I don't want Afghanis coming here to America in mass and trying to violently dictate to us here how we should live and in reality none have ever tried or would ever be likely too.

We are though going to Afghanistan to install a corrupt regime that has clung to power through rigged and fraudelent elections that is mired in the opium and heroin trade, and is making a kickback off of a transnational oil pipeline they have allowed to be built and huge copper reserves they have sold off. The cost of which for the U.S. besides prestige and the needless and tragic loss of our brave young men and women is a war debt that the associated bankers are going to make 1 trillion dollars a year in interest alone off of.

I have a very real belief that better economic and educational opportunities right here in America would keep the citizens of this country from supporting wars of attrition based on exploited emotional transference and emotional manipulation.

If only our government thought we were as worthy of jobs and economic opportunities as the Taliban!


reply posted on 28-11-2009 @ 02:03 PM by plumranch
From Another Washington Post September article

"I think that success in Afghanistan looks a great deal like success in Iraq," Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said Sunday. The situation in Iraq began to improve after Sunni tribes turned against al-Qaeda insurgents and accepted a security alliance with U.S. forces. Success in Iraq, however, also depended on a significant increase in U.S. troop deployments, a question that remains unanswered in Afghanistan. Gates said that he expects in "a matter of weeks" a White House decision on a revised strategy, and whether to supply U.S. commander Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal some or all of the additional troops he has requested


It appears the US is using the same tactic in Afghanistan that worked in Iraq. !) Troup surge 2) Turn the insurgents against al-qaeda.

Doesn't sound like this involves simply the exchange of money but rather working more closely with the insurgents, finding out what they want and applying a solution.


reply posted on 28-11-2009 @ 11:42 PM by jam321
reply to post by DraconianKing



If you guys were at all serious about winning this war you would create special units trained for well over a year and only then let them loose.


Very true. There are many things our government could be doing if they were serious about winning this war.



reply posted on 29-11-2009 @ 02:21 AM by plumranch
reply to post by jam321





Haven't captured Osama?


WASHINGTON -- Osama bin Laden was unquestionably within reach of U.S. troops in the mountains of Tora Bora when American military leaders made the crucial and costly decision not to pursue the terrorist leader with massive force, a Senate report says.


Senate report: Bin Laden was 'within our grasp'

Unquestionably within reach is a hard one to swallow!

I take it you don't think this new tactic will work? LOL


reply posted on 29-11-2009 @ 02:32 AM by jam321
reply to post by plumranch



No, it won't work.

We've had eight years, going on 9, to take care of Afghanistan. Our politicians have not taken this war seriously.

All their trying to do is pacify the area to make it look stabilize so we can withdraw.

If withdrawal is the agenda, then just do it. I just don't think any of our troops or allies troops should die because our politicians too scared to do the right thing.

Either fight or get the hell out of Dodge.


reply posted on 29-11-2009 @ 02:38 AM by Blanca Rose
reply to post by spy66



What a wonderful comment, and point you made.

Trade for something that is real. Once Americans realize their sons and daughters are fighting and dying for something not tradeable, then the poop really will hit the fan. But there is something tradeable, and flourishing with us being there..........hmmmmmmm, but it isn't paper money.

"Your'e outa the woods, you're outa the dark, you're outa the night"

The "Wizard of Oz," anyone, while the characters trounce in a poppy field?

Tell a father or a mother who's lost a child to this crap, about opium fields, and the invisible dollars we don't see, what it is all about, then the poop will really hit the fan.

And what the hell kinda topic is the crap from a news source? Tack? Don't they mean, TACT?


reply posted on 29-11-2009 @ 02:58 AM by plumranch
reply to post by jam321





All their trying to do is pacify the area to make it look stabilize so we can withdraw.


And keep the Arab factions fighting between themselves?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 2 days ago with 74 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 14 days ago with 37 member flags