Could Palins "Going Rogue" actually mean going against the illuminati?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 25-11-2009 @ 11:43 PM by calstorm
What if it was true? What implications could that have?



reply posted on 25-11-2009 @ 11:50 PM by dalan.
reply to post by calstorm



That is interesting that she actually said that in her book about "going rouge means going against the NWO and illuminati..."

Either she was sincere, and it would have to be assumed that she DID learn something on the campaign trail, like say maybe how John McCain played the part of the burnt-out, old doofus? So Obama would look more attractive?

OR, she is a "double-agent" of sorts, playing her part for the NWO.


reply posted on 25-11-2009 @ 11:51 PM by dalan.
reply to post by calstorm



Kudos on the food for thought though, that idea had never even crossed my mind.


reply posted on 26-11-2009 @ 12:03 AM by Kailassa
reply to post by calstorm



It's much simpler than that.

Going "rouge" simply means painting your cheeks with red gunk.

- Unless you are referring to a baboon, in which the signs of going rouge are more easily seen from a different perspective.

Of course, if the OP is meaning to say "going rogue", that's a much more serious situation.


reply posted on 26-11-2009 @ 12:30 AM by calstorm
Originally posted by Kailassa
reply to
post by calstorm



It's much simpler than that.

Going "rouge" simply means painting your cheeks with red gunk.

- Unless you are referring to a baboon, in which the signs of going rouge are more easily seen from a different perspective.

Of course, if the OP is meaning to say "going rogue", that's a much more serious situation.

Fixed. Thanks, I got quite the laugh out of that, even if it was at my own expense.


reply posted on 26-11-2009 @ 02:37 AM by TheLaughingGod
Originally posted by dalan.
reply to
post by calstorm



That is interesting that she actually said that in her book about "going rouge means going against the NWO and illuminati..."


I interpreted that as the OP's friend saying that, which one is it calstorm?


reply posted on 26-11-2009 @ 05:42 AM by ProTo Fire Fox
Palin, now theres a name that deserves some questions! I think that a lot of people in this thread have contributed some good information. However, some isn't so good. So today we're saying that Ms Palin was with the Illuminati, now if we're sure that we're saying Illuminati and we're laying off the Masons for a day I'll continue...

*looks around*

Ok... lets keep going...

Well The Illuminati is meant to be a top secret, wide spread elite group that control him, her and their mother. Now in this super-secret super-tight group. Which no one has ever been able to come out and say all the secrets (with enough proof to make it all 100% undeniable). Why exactly would they tell her a lot of information? Essentially putting themselves out there on the line. Now I'm just thinking about this from a different angle, but in my opinion it doesn't seem like a great way to go about things. calstorm, I think you've started a great thread here and you've got all our tongues wagging here about the possibilities, good job. I think that she is wrong, if she did write that first hand. I don't think the Illuminati did anything there, I think that if they needed her for some purpose it would of been done by now and that she would never of even relised it. Now, this makes me start to think along the same lines as dalan.. Now if you are controlling both parties, which we know has happened before. George Bush and John Kerry where both members of the highly controversial group/club Skull and Bones. Now lets presume that once again theres a behind the scenes man pulling the strings here. If he wants candidate A in, a good trick to use would be make candidate B look as bad as possible, without making it obvious what you're doing. Maybe she is believing that she was 'done over' by some one high up and is now striking back. She's hitting back at an unknown name and thus she swings at the most public, mysterious and controversial group, arguably, in the history of man-kind; The Illuminati.

I haven't got a definitive answer on this, but i thought that I would add in some comments, see if they can help some one else come up with the answer
Pages:     ^^TOP^^