Blue parasol picture in a catalogue

page: 2
14
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 02:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZombieJesus
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 



What the hell are you talking about and who the hell are you talking to?







No offense...


Don't start up with me.


No offense....

But how do you give the standard agent reply to me?????



ED: No new foes, cool


[edit on 11/25/2009 by TeslaandLyne]




posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Its not about having a sense of humor, its about the ridiculous trend of people wanting to debunk EVERYTHING that comes their way, or ridiculing other members because they have a *theory*

Its good to be skeptic, I question every UFO video as if its either explainable or a hoax. The burden is on them to prove otherwise.

And clearcut hoaxers need to be ridiculed, they deserve it



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:00 PM
link   
Photoshopped!!! Clearly this is CGI!! It's obvious that you scanned a photo of a turquoise bed sheet and augmented the color gradients to your liking but you forgot one key factor. The atmospheric effect of distance. It should be a bit hazy. Better yet, the clarity of the photo is a dead give away that it's hoaxed. You should have pixelated the hell out of it and ran a blurry non-matching edge around it make it look "authentic".

Why would you even get that close to a parasol without getting under it? Fond of the skin damaging rays of the sun? Clearly you are insane!

..or whomever photographed this image for this "alleged" catalogue.

Debunked!



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:01 PM
link   
Now let's spend 38 pages of in-depth analysis to determine that it's an umbrella.



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:10 PM
link   
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 



Slow down there bud, Im not trying to start anything with you.

I apologize for sounding harsh, but was just asking a simple question.

I have seen many posts by you around ATS, and you have a very unique writing style, that honestly I have a hard time following.




But how do you give the standard agent reply to me?????


Not following you here


What is a "standard agent reply"?

Please elaborate...



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:11 PM
link   
Well....

I can think of a few around here whom could tear this abomination a new one!!!

Phage
ArMaP
Chadwickus
easynow
George Noory
David Wilcock
Senator Read
Mother Teresa
Gandhi
Barney
Opus
The Smothers Brothers
Pledge
Jif
Welches
Pepsi and.....

Eric Cartman.


Where are these people when you need them?!?!



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:16 PM
link   
reply to post by redwoodjedi
 


There's no hope - even with those renegades - it's an (out of stock) aquamarine parasol - just don't fight it! :-)

Peace!



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by TallWhites

Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Its not about having a sense of humor, its about the ridiculous trend of people wanting to debunk EVERYTHING that comes their way, or ridiculing other members because they have a *theory*

Its good to be skeptic, I question every UFO video as if its either explainable or a hoax. The burden is on them to prove otherwise.

And clearcut hoaxers need to be ridiculed, they deserve it


Skepticism is great. Flat out denying something without considering all sides is not.
The burden is hardly on a person who comes across a video, believes it to be true, and posts it to get other opinions. Sorry, but you are wrong. Opinions are like a-holes, everyones got one and they all stink.

By that philosophy, it is on you to definitively disprove things, with evidence. Otherwise, you are no different.

I agree that all flat-out hoaxes need to be weeded out. however, most that people are freaking out about on here lately are not clear cut hoaxes. They are videos posted for analysis.

Finally, no one needs to be ridiculed. I would hope we are all old enough, smart enough, and mature enough to deal with such things in a better way than ridiculing people. Is it that hard to just discard the things you dont believe?



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:29 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


Hi!

This was meant to bring a little light heartededness into the fear, the pain, the uncertaintity of life....

Sorry if i've upset the innocent - but read your reply very objectively?

Peace!



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Wave
reply to post by redwoodjedi
 


There's no hope - even with those renegades - it's an (out of stock) aquamarine parasol - just don't fight it! :-)

Peace!


Peace? No peace.......Diiiiiiieeeeeee!

You supply the exif data and then I will see if I can get Jeff Ritzmann to comfirm the legitimacy of said aquamarine parasol. Pfffft!!

I stand firm. It's a superimposed tin roof from a garden shed from Better Homes and Gardens magazine!



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:36 PM
link   
reply to post by The Wave
 


Hey there
I started giggling before I even clicked onto the thread because I knew what it would be about.

Thank the goddess someone had the guts to speak out about that ridiculous white patio umberella (sorry UFO) thread. Now maybe people will stop posting on it and let it die ... or better yet let a mod put it out of it's misery (if the thread were a dog it would have been put down pages ago) !

Well done you.


Woody



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:37 PM
link   
reply to post by redwoodjedi
 


Damn!

Caught out again. Ok - so I'll provide the link but no one must look at it - promise? :-)

Peace!



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZombieJesus
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
 



Slow down there bud, Im not trying to start anything with you.

I apologize for sounding harsh, but was just asking a simple question.

I have seen many posts by you around ATS, and you have a very unique writing style, that honestly I have a hard time following.




But how do you give the standard agent reply to me?????


Not following you here


What is a "standard agent reply"?

Please elaborate...



Agents claim to know nothing yet are offended at not knowing
enough.
How do you figure.
What kind of agents are we talking about.
Agents of mis information.
Are you or I counted as one.
If not there why should we be offended.
Miss information about "Blue parasol picture in a catalogue"
is what I'm talking about.



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:40 PM
link   
reply to post by woodwytch
 

Only no one has answered the questions so nothing has been concluded.
You are entitled to your oppinion that it is an umbrella however, even though the inwards angles don't match that of an umbrella, and that it clearly is visible infront of pole on many screens. It also appears to be infront of the bush to the right. A very strange place for an umbrella not to mention that the umbrella pole would be missing.
Maybe it is an umbrella hovering?



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:41 PM
link   


Nice one OP.


Wait for maxxsee to come and tell us that it actually is a UFO and how wrong we all are.
Let a couple of people analyse it and see what they come up with.


It's NOT an umbrella.... can't be... where's the pole?




posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:41 PM
link   
reply to post by The Wave
 


O NO YOU DIDN'T! I think even Max got a chuckle out of this!! Good one. Thanks for the laugh Wave!



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Wave
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 


Hi!

This was meant to bring a little light heartededness into the fear, the pain, the uncertaintity of life....

Sorry if i've upset the innocent - but read your reply very objectively?

Peace!



And I apologise aif I come off as rude...I just see a definite trend on this site of making a joke out of those that people dont agree with. To me, that is the OPPOSITE of denying ignorance.

I guess I just long for the days when this site was about being constructive.



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:43 PM
link   
reply to post by captaintyinknots
 

A fine point indeed.



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by maxxsee
reply to post by woodwytch
 

Only no one has answered the questions so nothing has been concluded.
You are entitled to your oppinion that it is an umbrella however, even though the inwards angles don't match that of an umbrella, and that it clearly is visible infront of pole on many screens. It also appears to be infront of the bush to the right. A very strange place for an umbrella not to mention that the umbrella pole would be missing.
Maybe it is an umbrella hovering?

A hovering umbrella??!! O Max!! I love your sense of humor!
...
O/T- Max in case you didn't see one of my posts in your thread, I wanted to tell you that your summer home is absolutely beautiful, umbrella, UFO, porch, flagpole, infront, behind...all that aside. Gorgeous place and I wish it were mine!



posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 03:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by The Wave
reply to post by redwoodjedi
 


Damn!

Caught out again. Ok - so I'll provide the link but no one must look at it - promise? :-)

Peace!



I'm nobody's fool!! I know a military r.c. drone when I see one. I have it also from undisclosed sources that it could be a Chinese Haune Lantern in broad daylight being prepped for it's maiden over Honolulu.

I won't say my sources name but his initials are Art Bell.





top topics
 
14
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join