 |
|
Topic started on 21-5-2004 @ 05:28 AM by JCMinJapan
|
It seems that most are translated already. But, missing two currently. Any nice people out there would like to contribute to these answers?
Thanks alot, I would really apreciate it.
04/07/2004: Source Page Code: JJDFI UD IDUNFADSUN UDNF IDNMD EUDNA IDNFAD IUDD ID. UDNF DND IDFAD UENFQJD JNDFS. UJDNFS E UNDFS IUEW NDUFDAIU DUNFS
UIDFN FND. JNDFS UJND UYRWR UDNPODS YUNFN JDNFAD UNDFPAIUDN IEIE DJSDH UDSFN NDUFND IUDNASDF NUDN. UNDFSD NUDF. UNDFNU DUNFSDN ND MNDMKD.
04/07/2004: Alt Code: 38973 23 00346 2134 087310 783247 728 81723 721873
*** Edited to remove the one found below.....***
[Edited on 21-5-2004 by JCMinJapan]
Edited to remove the last two found.
[Edited on 23-5-2004 by JCMinJapan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-5-2004 @ 06:16 AM by Psyche
|
Hi JCMinJapan,
I just solved this one some hours ago:
 04/19/2004: From 2: urgent 0,1,3,4
0vnasoraoalt5ted4edgswelpdiutwnx0boeiddlasnahebx9eustisdltelchex0eroesealhwloatx4nmnacctueaynvrxifetrouaposoteaxhoshevrsllauabyxausineetodcrceex
2 
It translates to (I cut the words for better reading):
040904
i have been found our messages on this site are now discovered
secure all data
stop all uploads
the old line was actually our 5th contact
we have been betrayed
xxxxxxxx
Just put the encrypted text in a hex editor and you can just read it from top to bottom 
I've also send this to "The Clue Site" 
[Edited on 21-5-2004 by Psyche]
[Edited on 21-5-2004 by Psyche]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 21-5-2004 @ 06:32 AM by JCMinJapan
|
Originally posted by Psyche
I just solved this one some hours ago:
040904
i have been found our messages on this site are now discovered
secure all data
stop all uploads
the old line was actually our 5th contact
we have been betrayed
xxxxxxxx
I've also send this to "The Clue Site"
Hey, thanks alot and thanks for forwarding it to the site. Now, we are getting somewhere.. Does that imply that 5 is the 5th? hmmm.... or is 0 the
fifth? My guess us that it mst be 5.....
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 21-5-2004 @ 08:29 AM by Smudge
|
What it means is that Uncle jeff, who is contact -5- has betrayed them. And is really part of the old line. The line of Hammurabi as stated in another
clue.
Also at one point we were told by an encrypted post that 5 was dead blah blah.
This coincides with the faked death of Uncle as reported by Simon in his initial post.
I think.
[Edited on 21-5-2004 by Smudge]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 21-5-2004 @ 09:42 AM by amantine
|
After all the time I've spend on the 04/07 clues, I think they can't be solved, unless it is very complicated encryption. There is no word similar
to JJDFI in English, because only two or three very rare words start with two of the same letter: oocyt to name one.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 21-5-2004 @ 09:44 AM by JCMinJapan
|
Originally posted by JCMinJapan
05/18/2004: From 1:
UhW3QZWvU1SbUhWHQVWPUFSXUZKTMpOjcxezEJG7AdSTAZGnQRKLIBGHAZWbEhG/ElSTENGnERCPE5GXUdG/ApWfE9GfAlWbERCnE9CbEtGnA9WfElCzUdKHEtWfEhGbIBGnEJGPANWLUdGjEFCnUZ
GXE5WbEBG7IBCnUdCrAxKDANSTE9GXEVWfERCfERKDQRGXElCPAlGnAhW3UZGnERCTAdWfAdCfUdKDEFCPUZGnEhCTEJGTEpSTElC3QRG7AlGbUdCbEZGTEpCfEpGnEVCrE9GbApWbEhG/EVGjUdCr
AxKDANSTEZGnEJGTARCPANG3EFG3EVGDUdGPEtGrIJCfUdCfEFCTIJCjUdCPAdGTUZGfApWbAtG3UZGjE9GnQRGTA1CfUdG/ApWfApCzERWbEVCPE9GbExS/QROzE1GLERWbAtCrUZGXERCXEdGTAN
GjERCTAdGPUZCvE1WbEhG/ElSTENG3AlKDApCPEtWbEVCfEVCXERaDQRSDUZC3E1G/ElWfA1GHARWfEBGvUZCXE5KHERGvEVCvE1WbAZCTApSTQBWbEhG/E9GfEZG7EhWfE1GjUdGXQRG3E1CXERWb
EhCbE1GXANWbANCrUZGnERWbA1G3E9GnUdG/EdCnUZCfE1GnA9KDElGXUdGXEZGTUZGLE5CrQRGDElGjUdGnEVCPEVCbEtG3EVG/ElCjUdG/EJGvE1GLERWbANG3EpSTApGnAdGzUZGfE1GXAZGvEl
STANG/QRCTIBCjERCTEVCPEVGLENWbAtCPUZCPApWbElGTUZCjE5aDQRSDUdGDEtWbAdGzERCfENWbAVGvAlCfApWbEFCXElGbUdCrAxGTUZGLERC7EhWfEhCfAZWbAhGjA1GXUdCPEFWfApCzEhCr
QRG7IBCfUdG/ApWfAlGXUdG/EZWfURGfE1GPEBGTURSTEpGXEJWfElGrERKDEhCTEVGDEtC3QRGbEVGjE9GnEZWfApCzERKHQRGjIJGDUdCnERWfEVGLENWbAVG7IFCbIBKDAdW3gFa7ING7ANCPUZ
CvApWbANGvIJSTEVG/EZWfIBGHAZWbA9GDUZCXE5KHEZGjEpCfApaDQRKnElC/ERKHAZGTARSTUxaHQRKbE5GHERCjAdCnUZCzEhCPQRCbEVGDIJGnAhWfAdCvANG7QRCPARGfANG7QRGbElGLERCT
ANCPElGXUdKLAtGXElWL
I am fairly sure that this is MIME encryption. Anyone able to try it to see? I have been looking for a program on the internet to do it, but no
luck.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 21-5-2004 @ 11:35 AM by PurdueNuc
|
I've spent a couple hours on that message from 1. It does appear to be base64 (the typical method of encoding for email), but the result is
gibberish. It doesn't appear to be a binary of some sort either (there's no header like you'd find for an image or sound file). It might be
encrypted with something like RC2, RC4, or PGP. Good luck if that's the case. There is definite order, though, so it just may be a text code.
You can code/decode base64 here.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 21-5-2004 @ 09:10 PM by JCMinJapan
|
Ok, I have tried the following decode checks......
Base64
BINHEX
XXE
UUE
BOO
BTOA
None of those seem to work..... Anyone have any other ideas? I have not found a good PGP decoder yet... still looking..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 21-5-2004 @ 09:43 PM by machinegunjordan
|
well when i was decoding base 64 it said it was created june 8th 2016 and the actual post says march 30 2003 but it used to say 1973
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 21-5-2004 @ 10:04 PM by PurdueNuc
|
I've been looking at these codes for a while now, and I'm starting to think that they're really some sort of replacement cipher. There is too much
pattern in them. Try breaking them up into groups of 4. For instance, in the latest code, the phrase "cxez" appears several times. There are
other phrases similar to that.
Another approach I've been looking at is translating the characters into their decimal equivalents. It might be that these are number codes like the
earlier ones, but the numbers have been translated into characters.
Where did you get 2016 from, machinegunjordan? I haven't seen that anywhere.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 22-5-2004 @ 12:26 AM by Username
|
i think that blocks of four look promising.
[Edited on 22-5-2004 by Username]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 22-5-2004 @ 05:25 AM by amantine
|
Blocks of four, blocks of two and blocks of two with the last latter of every block removed don't give character frequencies similar to English. The
blocks of two has over 70 characters and the blocks of four has even more. The blocks with the last letter removed has only 12 character in the half
of the text I tested.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 22-5-2004 @ 10:13 AM by machinegunjordan
|
i got 2016 when i was base64 decoding at that link you gave and i clicked this one thing that saidblahblahdecode and it was gibberish except it gave a
date that was june 8th 2016 maybe that is part of the post and it talks about something on that date
[Edited on 22-5-2004 by machinegunjordan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 23-5-2004 @ 05:03 AM by JCMinJapan
|
Ok, I took the latest message from 1 to Simon and took out all the letters and made the size about 20. I noticed something that I did not notice
before.... It has a hex code. When in lower graphics, I took it for a "1" when it was all together in the sentence.
Take a look at the first row/last character below. Not sure what this means, but I hope it helps someone......
53/79/1575l
337l77l1/l7l331/l5
7557/1l7l931l
77973/l5
/l55355/1
5l1l/99l311
[Edited on 23-5-2004 by JCMinJapan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 23-5-2004 @ 10:01 AM by amantine
|
I think the first clue is encoded using Xoft.
Try a text with a random key. The results are similar.
The problem is that Xoft seems very hard to break. How it works
( source):
- convert data and key character into US-ASCII equivalent
- each ASCII data XOR with each ASCII key
- add the result with key length
- convert it to 8 bit binary value and concat them all
- split the result into 4 bit binary value
- convert it to decimal value
- multiply by 4 then add with m where m=0,1,2, or 3 depends on decimal place
- convert it into base64 value
I'll try to see if I can break it, but I think promise anything.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 23-5-2004 @ 10:12 AM by amantine
|
Converted from Base64 to decimal values:
20 33 22 55 16 25 22 47 20 53 18 27 20 33 22 7 16 21 22 15 20 5 18 23 20 25 10 19 12 41
14 35 28 49 30 51 4 9 6 59 0 29 18 19 0 25 6 39 16 17 10 11 8 1 6 7 0 25 22 27 4 33 6
63 4 37 18 19 4 13 6 39 4 17 2 15 4 57 6 23 20 29 6 63 0 41 22 31 4 61 6 31 0 37 22 27 4
17 2 39 4 61 2 27 4 45 6 39 0 61 22 31 4 37 2 51 20 29 10 7 4 45 22 31 4 33 6 27 8 1 6
39 4 9 6 15 0 13 22 11 20 29 6 35 4 5 2 39 20 25 6 23 4 57 22 27 4 1 6 59 8 1 2 39 20
29 2 43 0 49 10 3 0 13 18 19 4 61 6 23 4 21 22 31 4 17 2 31 4 17 10 3 16 17 6 23 4 37
2 15 0 37 6 39 0 33 22 55 20 25 6 39 4 17 2 19 0 29 22 31 0 29 2 31 20 29 10 3 4 5 2
15 20 25 6 39 4 33 2 19 4 9 6 19 4 41 18 19 4 37 2 55 16 17 6 59 0 37 6 27 20 29 2 27 4
25 6 19 4 41 2 31 4 41 6 39 4 21 2 43 4 61 6 27 0 41 22 27 4 33 6 63 4 21 6 35 20 29 2
43 0 49 10 3 0 13 18 19 4 25 6 39 4 9 6 19 0 17 2 15 0 13 6 55 4 5 6 55 4 21 6 3 20 29
6 15 4 45 6 43 8 9 2 31 20 29 2 31 4 5 2 19 8 9 2 35 20 29 2 15 0 29 6 19 20 25 6 31
0 41 22 27 0 45 6 55 20 25 6 35 4 61 6 39 16 17 6 19 0 53 2 31 20 29 6 63 0 41 22 31 0 41
2 51 4 17 22 27 4 21 2 15 4 61 6 27 4 49 18 63 16 17 14 51 4 53 6 11 4 17 22 27 0 45 2 43
20 25 6 23 4 17 2 23 4 29 6 19 0 13 6 35 4 17 2 19 0 29 6 15 20 25 2 47 4 53 22 27 4
33 6 63 4 37 18 19 4 13 6 55 0 37 10 3 0 41 2 15 4 45 22 27 4 21 2 31 4 21 2 23 4 17 26
3 16 17 18 3 20 25 2 55 4 53 6 63 4 37 22 31 0 53 6 7 0 17 22 31 4 1 6 47 20 25 2 23 4
57 10 7 4 17 6 47 4 21 2 47 4 53 22 27 0 25 2 19 0 41 18 19 16 1 22 27 4 33 6 63 4 61 6
31 4 25 6 59 4 33 22 31 4 53 6 35 20 29 6 23 16 17 6 55 4 53 2 23 4 17 22 27 4 33 2 27 4
53 6 23 0 13 22 27 0 13 2 43 20 25 6 39 4 17 22 27 0 53 6 55 4 61 6 39 20 29 6 63 4 29 2
39 20 25 2 31 4 53 6 39 0 61 10 3 4 37 6 23 20 29 6 23 4 25 6 19 20 25 6 11 4 57 2 43
16 17 6 3 4 37 6 35 20 29 6 39 4 21 2 15 4 21 2 27 4 45 6 55 4 21 6 63 4 37 2 35 20 29
6 63 4 9 6 47 4 53 6 11 4 17 22 27 0 13 6 55 4 41 18 19 0 41 6 39 0 29 6 51 20 25 6 31 4
53 6 23 0 25 6 47 4 37 18 19 0 13 6 63 16 17 2 19 8 1 2 35 4 17 2 19 4 21 2 15 4 21 6
11 4 13 22 27 0 45 2 15 20 25 2 15 0 41 22 27 4 37 6 19 20 25 2 35 4 57 26 3 16 17 18 3
20 29 6 3 4 45 22 27 0 29 6 51 4 17 2 31 4 13 22 27 0 21 6 47 0 37 2 31 0 41 22 27 4 5
2 23 4 37 6 27 20 29 2 43 0 49 6 19 20 25 6 11 4 17 2 59 4 33 22 31 4 33 2 31 0 25 22
27 0 33 6 35 0 53 6 23 20 29 2 15 4 5 22 31 0 41 2 51 4 33 2 43 16 17 6 59 8 1 2 31 20
29 6 63 0 41 22 31 0 37 6 23 20 29 6 63 4 25 22 31 20 17 6 31 4 53 6 15 4 1 6 19 20 17
18 19 4 41 6 23 4 9 22 31 4 37 6 43 4 17 10 3 4 33 2 19 4 21 6 3 4 45 2 55 16 17 6 27
4 21 6 35 4 61 6 39 4 25 22 31 0 41 2 51 4 17 10 7 16 17 6 35 8 9 6 3 20 29 2 39 4 17
22 31 4 21 6 11 4 13 22 27 0 21 6 59 8 5 2 27 8 1 10 3 0 29 22 55 32 5 26 59 8 13 6 59
0 13 2 15 20 25 2 47 0 41 22 27 0 13 6 47 8 9 18 19 4 21 6 63 4 25 22 31 8 1 6 7 0 25
22 27 0 61 6 3 20 25 2 23 4 57 10 7 4 25 6 35 4 41 2 31 0 41 26 3 16 17 10 39 4 37 2 63
4 17 10 7 0 25 6 19 0 17 18 19 20 49 26 7 16 17 10 27 4 57 6 7 4 17 2 35 0 29 2 39 20
25 2 51 4 33 2 15 16 17 2 27 4 21 6 3 8 9 6 39 0 33 22 31 0 29 2 47 0 13 6 59 16 17 2
15 0 17 6 31 0 13 6 59 16 17 6 27 4 37 6 11 4 17 2 19 0 13 2 15 4 37 6 23 20 29 10 11
0 45 6 23 4 37 22 11
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 23-5-2004 @ 10:35 AM by Transc3ndent
|
I just hope it's not RSA or something 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 23-5-2004 @ 10:50 AM by amantine
|
[Edit: the result is just a mistake in the decoder itself]
[Edited on 23-5-2004 by amantine]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 23-5-2004 @ 10:53 AM by Transc3ndent
|
nm
[Edited on 23-5-2004 by Transc3ndent]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 23-5-2004 @ 11:13 AM by AlexKennedy
|
[I turned out to be wrong]
[Edited on 23-5-2004 by AlexKennedy]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
