Metallic saucer filmed on my mobile phone {{Identified}}, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 118 times


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 07:58 PM by Horza
reply to post by william.gauncents



This is a terrible "debunking" with no offer of proof than your personal opinion ... and quite rude as well ... no need for rudeness mate.

Have you ever filmed with a mobile camera?

I know when I do, because of the view finder, I can be quite aware of what else is going on around in the general vicinity of the subject I am filming.

So the OP could have easily be filming the first object and notice the secondary object in his periphery vision.

Echelon - The ATS video analysts will need to see the original footage that has not been put through youtube ... RAW images if possible.

I must admit I don't know if a phone camera produces RAW files but if they do, that is what will be needed to be analysed.

Personally the third vid that shows the object move to the left and then stop is very interesting to me.

I would love to see what an analysis of that finds.

Edit - I think this is a cracking vid ... thanks Echelon



[edit on 24/11/09 by Horza]


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 08:16 PM by Chadwickus
reply to post by fleabit



Any movement could simply be attributed to the camera moving laterally. There is not enough movement to say that the UFO is what is moving.

The smaller object, as I said looks like it's CGI. The motion tracking is all off. But hey maybe that's how the fly, jumping about when the camera jumps about.


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 08:19 PM by fleabit
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to
post by fleabit



Any movement could simply be attributed to the camera moving laterally. There is not enough movement to say that the UFO is what is moving.

The smaller object, as I said looks like it's CGI. The motion tracking is all off. But hey maybe that's how the fly, jumping about when the camera jumps about.


I don't think so. The awning on the house did not move at all, just the object. The camera was not moving laterally. The object was moving. In fact, it was moving left when the camera jerked right. So no, not jerks, nor lateral movement.

Not saying it isn't CGI, just saying that I don't think you can discount a sighting because it doesn't move in the way you feel it should.


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 08:20 PM by heyo
reply to post by Chadwickus




no i disagree there is a truss or soffit backing that doesn't change it's position until he does move it laterally, and that is to follow the ufo's movement.
Also in the third video it appears to be stationary, move, then stop. Do balloons do this?
very interesting video thank you for posting.

-So the cgi claim is just like calling this guy a liar, isn't it? Am i misinterpreting the situation?


[edit on 24-11-2009 by heyo]



reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 08:24 PM by Chadwickus
reply to post by fleabit



I'm not discounting the sighting.

Just making observations.

Also, I re-watched the video and agree it does move to the left.
My mistake.





[edit on 24/11/09 by Chadwickus]


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 08:30 PM by Echelon117
reply to post by Blaine91555



There are only houses and vines around there, definitely no offices or anything. As soon as I seen this thing, I thought it was a balloon, however after a few seconds I realized it wasn't like any balloon I am familiar with.

It definitely appeared metallic and shiny on top, like it was polished to a sheen. And as I said in my description, it was stationary in the sky for about a minute before it started to move to the left. As it was hovering still, there was a slight wobble to it, like it was floating and not dead still.

For it to have been a balloon, someone would have had to be out in the vines with a rope (which I never noticed) which would have extended up into the sky and tied to the bottom of the craft.

It wasn't very high, the size of the craft I would say appeared to have been around 30 feet I guess, I can't be sure.

Why someone would be out in the vines, on a scorching hot day with a flying saucer balloon I really don't know hahaha, but perhaps they were and perhaps it was a hoax and it indeed fooled me.

I don't believe it was a balloon, not one bit. Or the smaller craft.
The saucer in the sky never displayed any physics shattering maneuvers unfortunately for any viewers of the videos.

This isn't unfortunate for me however, because just seeing it there in the sky, slowly wobbling, slowly moving off to the left and the appearance of the smaller ball shaped craft was enough for me personally.

It blew my mind.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Egg found in Martian Meteorite
  Posted 18 days ago with 126 member flags
Ooparts and Ancient aliens
  Posted 2 days ago with 53 member flags
Bad Ufologists-Lets clean the closet of any skeletons
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
Death by UFO!
  Posted 15 days ago with 49 member flags
UFOs during Satellite launch
  Posted 10 days ago with 49 member flags
Tracey Taylor - "Aliens Gave Me a Special Gift"
  Posted 9 days ago with 31 member flags
DIVINE INTERVENTION: ETs Defeating Old World Order
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags