U.S. won't join landmine ban, administration decides, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 08:47 PM by ~Lucidity
reply to post by HunkaHunka



Well if that's true then maybe we should be doing the most to clean them up...aren't we the ones deploying the most? As far as signing the treaty, it would have been a show of solidarity. That's never bad. But in a way I guess it is...solidarity with Cuba and whoever the other non signatories are.

Edit to fix typo and clarify the Cuba point.

[edit on 24-11-2009 by ~Lucidity]


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 08:50 PM by aorAki
reply to post by cavscout



Just because you 'know' about them and have used them doesn't make them any better...in fact, because you have used them makes you worse.

Bring on the flaming from your position of 'superior knowledge'. It'll just show you up for what you are...an apologist for dismemberment, death and murder.




reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 09:11 PM by cavscout
reply to post by aorAki



Oh hi, good to meet you. You must be new around here.

I dont support any of the wars we are currently in, or the troops that fight in them. I am not some flag waving blowhard, I am not a fascist, and I am not a war monger.

I accept responsibility for my actions and refuse to accept any of that "we were just doing our job" crap. I am a murdering bastard and I live with the weight of that every day and night. I am now a washed up, PTSD having, conscientious objecting agoraphobic. I have hallucinations and cant leave my house without my wife holding my hand. I am a pathetic peice of crap, a shell of my former self.

I deserve every bit of disrespect for what I did in Iraq and then some, so go ahead and fire away, see if you can make me hurt even more.

HOWEVER, I do know what I am talking about here, and I am in possession of “superior knowledge," sad as that is.

Mines are a very valuable asset to our military forces and if ever said forces are used legitimately, to defend our homeland, mines will be one of the biggest contributing factors when it comes to keeping invading forces away from our homes and out in the open where we will blast them off our land, may God have mercy on our souls.

Now, if you will excuse me, I don’t think I will be back on this thread for a bit.

[edit on 24-11-2009 by cavscout]


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 09:47 PM by Keymaster1
Old News, but anyway, the reason we don't sign is that mines/landmines/anti-personnel mines are all a part of the Global Rule and Control Dogma.

Mines are used in conjunction with other types of encirclement/protection/barrier implements to ensure populations of third world stay in limited areas,(so they don't get uppity and think they can go out on their own and provide for their families outside the proscribed manner( wage slavery). (see Clinton Global Initiative)( Billies Boys went into Tsunami ravaged areas 'especially in southern India', to "Give widowed women self-employment work, doing light assembly work( provided by representitives of Big Manufacturing) that can be done while your tot is strapped to your back, Instead of finding a new Husband and taking care of your kid the right way.(not by yourself)( see 'destruction of the family unit as a means to limit political involvement/social betterment). "See" means Google it!.

I worked in a machine shop back in 1990( temp job w/Kelly Services while looking for reg. emp. in my field, took 3 mos.), that manufactured firing pins/casings for small (under 1 ft. dia.) anti-personnel mines, the foreman said that the Govt contract kept him "in business" while the other products(rachet heads for 1/4" drive pnumatic wrenches, and other gen. merch.) made a minimal profit margin.

What I'm getting at is that Capitalism (which I love and will fight to keep as our basis of my country) chases the lowest cost of production, so if you want look at mines as a "jobs program" then so be it! (see previous posts as to the jobs produced( military MOS) by the use/removal of "mines".

By The Way, NO AMERICAN MADE MINE is responsible for the current carnage discussed here, the ones used in africa/asia are SOVIET design/manufacture placed by THEIR OWN GOVT.S'

And remember, every dollar we spend/send on/to places where there are mines is one dollar that is not for use in AMERICA! So, don't whine when you see articles about how there isn't enough food/heating oil/gas/housing/govt. cheese/money to pay down the natl. debt, cause you feel bad for the third world. They Do It To Themselves!

And as a side note about the photo of the kid with 1 leg, how do you know he didn't lose it in a car/cart mishap, or from infection of what was a "scratch" which went septic do to poor hygene, or maybe a hyena bit it off, or it was so horribly mal-formed at birth that it was better to cut it off than make him drag it behind him for the rest of his life, etc., etc., A picture may be worth a thousand words, but it can also be a propoganda tool to do evil with!( mis-represent a fact to effect public opinion)

Any treaty/pact/agreement with the UN or any other country in this world will ALWAYS be a negative for US, as the rest of the world is JEALOUS of our freedom/power/standard of living, and will always be looking for ways to destroy us. So don't be a ninny! Stand up and say "EAT ME COMMIE SCUM" and be happly/grateful you weren't born in sub-saharan africa to a tribal toilet bearer/cleaner.(yes, they have that life classification, its called un-touchable, etc.)

Wake Up! Work daily to un-brainwash yourself!


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 11:04 PM by HunkaHunka
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to
post by HunkaHunka



Well kf that's true then maybe we should be doing the most to clean them up...aren't we the ones deploying the most? As far as signing the treaty, it would have been a show of solidarity. That's never bad. But in a way I guess it is...with Cuba and whoever the other non signatories are.



Actually, I don't recall getting any data points on who actually uses the most of them. And it very well might be the US. If it is, then obviously we have an obligation to be the worlds top spender on cleaning them up.

I still think an outright ban would have put us in a very precarious situation.

HOWEVER, it might be a way to lead the world on this.

Yet it stands to reason to me, that when fighting in some place like Afghanistan... you are going to employ people who use this tactic.


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 11:20 PM by cavscout
Originally posted by ADVISOR
If EOD can not respond to an explosive hazard, Scouts are able to. So the weight of having that training measures in.


Is this something that is happening often over there? I don’t remember actually doing ANY disarming of mines and I.E.D.s over there. Where I was, at least, we usually had little robots for the few times we detected explosives before detonation. Of course, as a scout I was TRAINED to take care of the explosives, but never had to deal with it in real life. I was in the expeditionary forces, left Iraq in April of '04 and discharged with a medical separation by Christmas '04.

I was 2/2 ACR out of Polk, we took Sadr City and held it till 1st Cav replaced us and it went to hell.

Back then the primary role of a Scout was neighborhood sweeps, and convoy escort for the first 6 months or so and then we took over the training of the ICDC Iraqi Army, a job normally for SF but they were all in Kabul and the task fell to us.

We were basically like I.E.D. magnets and I will tell you that although we never shammed a patrol, we were deeply affected psychologically and emotionally by the prospect of hitting an I.E.D. and this affected our decision making process.

I learned to respect and fear such things as mined routes. It cannot be understated that mines and I.E.D.s will continue to play a vital role in tactical situations.

No matter what any of you say, even if you hate mines today, if we were invaded by red China tonight 90% of you would be learning to make I.E.D.s tomorrow, and you would support their use.


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 11:34 PM by HunkaHunka
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler



That's the other thing. If all of Nato were to do it, well then Nato couldn't buy them anymore could they?


I actually think it's the opposite though, you sell to your allies because they are typically aligned for economic reasons anyway... where as friends share your societal values.


[edit on 24-11-2009 by HunkaHunka]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 15 hours ago, 24 flags
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 20 flags
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 19 flags
My Brain = about to explode
  Member Art, Posted 6 hours ago, 13 flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 15 hours ago, 117 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 94 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 10 hours ago, 64 replies