It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

AREA 51 - uknown device shown and discussed

page: 4
12
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 27 2009 @ 02:56 AM
link   
reply to post by tauristercus
 


i feel like your on to something, something is definitely fishy about that and as a nevada resident you do see some suspect things happen.
But i personally dont think it is what your suggesting, it does seem like something inordinate though.




posted on Nov, 27 2009 @ 11:04 AM
link   
The only part of this that makes me think it could be artificial is the white 'ring' looking object which is a whitish color. But otherwise I believe that our brains are wired to recognize humanlike features in things, so perhaps that's all that is going on with the 'head' object.



posted on Nov, 27 2009 @ 11:13 AM
link   
I was just going to say its a bush!

But due to the minimum word limit...... ITS A BUSH!



posted on Nov, 30 2009 @ 09:23 AM
link   
I must say good work there.
As to the people that flame skeptics and debunkers, I must say shame on you. If we can't have someone on here post something and go through a few skeptics, then it will never change anyones mind.
I personally think its a bush and rocks just due to the overhead view of the satellite, but I could be wrong. I give the OP a star a flag because they went throught the trouble of examining the map with great detail and I look forward to any other finds this person has because one day it just might shut us skeptics up.
We all have different talents and viewpoints, and the back and forth discussions are what filters out the lies and equals the truth.
Without skeptics there would be only lies.
Good job OP, keep up the hunting.



posted on Nov, 30 2009 @ 09:32 AM
link   
Some blurry pictures with arrows explaining whait I should see?
Fail.


Ex

posted on Nov, 30 2009 @ 09:44 AM
link   
I Starred and Flagged this thread on the sheer work
the OP put into this.
I would however like to see more eveidence
and maybe a different view of the same area
before I can reach any conclusion .



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 08:17 PM
link   
In looking at the isolated and "filter-applied" images of this object or collection of objects it almost looks like a character from one of those Super Mario games! 8n)

Sorry, wasn't trying to poke fun but seriously it does a bit doesn't it when the colours are enhanced?!

The only thing that comes to mind is perhaps some sort of remote-controlled device like a roving device or perhaps something like one of those remote-controlled robots used by bomb disposal teams???

M.



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 08:42 PM
link   
You know what it reminds me of, the checkpoint portals in Turok 2.
I found a pic, if anyone wanted to see.




The blue ring he is seeing in his device reminds me of the ones on the portal.

I don't know, looks similar to me.
Heh, imagine if he stumbled upon a star gate!


[edit on 12/1/2009 by Alexander the Great]



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 09:03 PM
link   
Yah Turok 2, I remember that game! Seriously though I do not know what it is, I could see it being a bush or being whatever artificial device people are making it out to be. If it is artificial, lets think about why it is out there, and what its purpose is.

[edit on 1-12-2009 by Nathwa]



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 09:09 PM
link   
If this is an artificial device, then clearly someone had to place it there. It would have needed to be transported there by truck and would likely need monitoring and regular inspection, so we should be able to see tire tracks and evidence that people have been in the area. If it was constructed on site, then there should be even more evidence of human activity. Which brings up the next question - why put it out in the middle of nowhere, knowingly observable from above?

Looks like the a clump of rocks and vegetation to me.



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 09:12 PM
link   
That is assuming it is not alien in origin. If it is alien, then that might explain why there is no tire tracks or equipment around it. The bush theory seems much too convienent, seeing that it is an awfully goofy looking batch of bushes and rocks.



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 09:21 PM
link   
Because I feel so strongly that there is definitely some kind of device being shown in these images (and NOT rocks or bushes), I actually got intouch with the DigitalGlobe people and queried whether I'd be able to purchase the a copy of the high res version which would be hopefully superior to what we're seeing on GE and hopefully show the device in greater detail.

Here's their email response:


"This region, if I checked the Google Earth file correctly, is over the United States?

The most recent, cloud free, complete coverage and colour image we have is from 2007 at a pixel resolution of 60cm. There is more recent imagery at a 50cm resolution, so quite a bit sharper, but it only comes in black and white. So depending on your requirements either image may be suitable.

Cost, for 25 square kilometres, would be $600.00 + GST per image. If this is acceptable we would need a full name, contact, details, street address, planned usage, reason for purchase, etc before we proceed with a possible sale given its location."


However, as you can see, they want $660 (including tax) for a 25 square kilometre image ... way to much for my pocket !


Also very interesting to see that I would need to justify to them exactly WHY I want a hires image of that particular location ... makes you wonder if there's something "unusual" to be seen at the location I specified !




"...before we proceed with a possible sale given its location."



[edit on 1/12/09 by tauristercus]



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 09:24 PM
link   
reply to post by bagari
 




why put it out in the middle of nowhere, knowingly observable from above?


Not much of a security risk in my opinion.

Can't imagine anyone else visually inspecting every single square kilometre of those mountains ... it was simply THE biggest fluke that I happened to be looking around that location and it caught my eye ... would have been just as easy to overlook or miss it completely.



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 09:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nathwa
That is assuming it is not alien in origin. If it is alien, then that might explain why there is no tire tracks or equipment around it. The bush theory seems much too convienent, seeing that it is an awfully goofy looking batch of bushes and rocks.


I completely agree that the "bush/rock theory" is simply too convenient a way to deflect and discourage further interest, examination or discussion.



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 09:54 PM
link   
At this point what we need are some experts. Someone who is good at dissecting images and determining what is in it. I for one am not a specialist, all I see is something goofy looking.



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 10:00 PM
link   
That is not a giant robotic duck type object its just blurred pixelation. The OP has got waay to much time on his hands.

[edit on 1-12-2009 by VitalOverdose]



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 10:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nathwa
At this point what we need are some experts. Someone who is good at dissecting images and determining what is in it. I for one am not a specialist, all I see is something goofy looking.


Unless we're prepared to spend $600+ on a hires image, unfortunately I think this is the best analysis we're going to be able to do.
I, personally, have already spent months analyzing and enhancing the image that we have and if it was just so easy to see that its just a pile of rocks as so many state after just a few seconds of looking at my images, don't you think I'd have come to that conclusion as well ?



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 10:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by VitalOverdose
That is not a giant robotic duck type object its just blurred pixelation. The OP has got waay to much time on his hands.

[edit on 1-12-2009 by VitalOverdose]


Or perhaps I haven't just jumped to a hasty conclusion as soooo many seem to be doing.

I just don't get it at all ... I've gone to the trouble of extracting the device from it's background and you have to be BLIND not to be able to see it's a device and NOT a pile of rocks or pixellation.

I'm seriously beginning to think these ridiculous posts about rocks/bushes is deliberate disinformation and coverup to hide the fact that something very unusual has been unintentionally leaked.



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 10:16 PM
link   
reply to post by tauristercus
 


I work all day with images blown up to that size and what you have there is blurred pixelation of a bush / grassy area and the surrounding rocks. With a bit of imagination you can blow up any part of that image and find something that looks like a face or an object, its cause by the compression routines of the format.


[edit on 1-12-2009 by VitalOverdose]



posted on Dec, 1 2009 @ 10:27 PM
link   
To the OP ... I don't mean to dis, I know you put alot of work into this "analysis", but frankly every one of your pictures looks the same to me - a pile of rocks. Also, the more current images may display slightly different now in GE, compared before - if new overflight scan was integrated in GE. Possibly a different angle and/or at a different time of day.

The closest "alien" I make out of this is an "Excalbian" from Star-Trek ...







[edit on 2009-12-1 by EnhancedInterrogator]




top topics



 
12
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join