It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by chopppacalamari
You should go back and look at the two pictures you have side by side showing the original and the "Degraded" pictures.
Any one with 20/20 vision can see that these two pics are exactly the same except the photographs were taken at different times of the day.
The "Distortions" are nothing but longer shadows cast by the sun. Have another look and you will see I am right.
Excellent work though. Keep looking and you might come up with something but I doubt the people at area 51 would leave an alien body laying on the ground.
I appreciate the effort you put into the analysis of the satellite image, you did one heck of a job -- however, the problem with shadows is always an important one. From now on, well before you begin scrutinizing structure, first work out if the lighting is correct and matches what you think you're seeing.
Originally posted by Hemlocks
I hope it is a real picture of an alien. For if true then I will have a BIG laugh when some fat donald duck like alien starts to try and give me orders or wants me to make a religion and worship it like so many false gods.
Originally posted by Waldy
The image clearly shows shadows of rocks and slopes but the device doesnt cast any shadow at all. How do you explain the lack of shadow from the device? And why is the landscape around it covered with the exact same tones of blue, red and green?
Your research and analysis is very good, however, your conclusion puzzles me. Dont get me wrong, I can see the shape of your "device" but I know it isnt a device, its only rocks. There is just too many things in the actual image that proof its nothing more than a part of the landscape and you ignore my previous post instead of addressing it because deep down you know you are wrong but after spending months on this you refuse to give up. You are chasing windmills with this one, give it up already and spend your energy on something more promising.
Originally posted by gariac
reply to post by tauristercus
Date stamps are not very accurate. You need to turn on the overlay that indicates the boundary of the imagery.
Of course, that won't help a person who sees things when nothing is there. ;-)
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
omg... this is ridiculously pushing the limits on visualization.
Originally posted by Shadowhawk
No matter how I look at this one, it is just rocks and shrubs. The feature doesn't seem out of place relative to any other rocks and shrubs in the surrounding terrain.
Moreover, this feature is in the middle of nowhere. it's not really "near" Area 51, so the thread title is somewhat misleading
... and there are no roads or other nearby infrastructure.
There is nothing remotely artificial-looking about it ... This just looks like rocks.
I think it is important to note that the OP is the same person who posted pictures (on another thread) of an obvious cattle watering hole, claiming it was a crashed flying saucer.