posted on Nov, 25 2009 @ 08:38 AM
"Remember also that the smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights, cannot claim to be defenders of
"Civil rights", "minority rights", "woman's rights", "elderly rights", "disabled rights", "gay rights" and on and on and on, every day a
new cause for "new" rights for some group that imagines their qualification of being a minority gives them access to some special rights above and
beyond the very simple and basic rights they all ready have and have had since the moment they were born. One does not need to have a skin color
other than white, does not need to have a gender other than male, does not need to have youth, does not need to be fully abled, nor do they need to be
heterosexual in order to enjoy their rights, the same rights that any person has.
So, why is it then, that We the People have so foolishly and so willingly gone along with allowing for these special rights which are tantamount to
government granted privileges be framed in terms of rights? Everybody has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of property and happiness.
This means everybody has the right to speak freely, to print freely, to worship freely and to gather peaceably in public and demand a redress of
grievances from their government. Everybody has the right to due process of law! Everybody, regardless of who they are, what sex they are, who they
are having consensual adult sex with, and age, race, or creed, has these rights and no special privileges granted by government can be superior to
Yet, here we are in these modern times actually debating whether or not gay people have the right to get married. The tragedy of this farce lies not
in the question of whether gay people have that right, but lies in the fact that all the people, including many so called "patriots" will apply to
the state for a license to marry! To marry the one we love is a sacred right not granted by government and a license is a privilege granted by
government to do something not otherwise legal. Yet, is it illegal to marry? What is to stop a church that wants to marry gay people from doing so?
The debate is not about being free to marry, it is sadly about homosexuals wanting the same tax breaks as heterosexuals get on this so called
"Personal Income Tax" that most of these people are not likely liable for and therefore not subject to the laws they so willingly submit to.
So, the whole question of why free and sovereign individuals are so willingly pleading with their state and local governments for a license to wed
gets lost in silly debates over whether gay people should be "allowed" to marry. On both sides of this insipid issue there are people that declare
"as a taxpayer I have rights!" What does that mean? Do "taxpayers" have some special right elevated above and beyond the very basic human rights
belonging to all people? What the hell is a "taxpayer"? How many people have even bothered to look up the very specific statutorily defined
meaning of "taxpayer". Do "taxpayers" have rights? Those who think they do should take a look at the so called "taxpayers bill of rights"
and compare that with the actual Bill of Rights enumerated within the Constitution for the United States of America.
How pathetic and pitiful We the People have become and to add insult to injury, now as we enter into this so called "awakening" we mutter and mumble
and even loudly declare that it is violence that is the answer. In the end, violence may indeed be the only answer, but not before we have exhausted
all other avenues. What is wrong with us that we would actually go to the state or city and apply for a license to wed? What is wrong with us that
we might very well not attend a church that is not a 501c3 "tax exempt" status? What the hell has happened to us and if we are so stupid as to
willingly enter into such foolish agreements with ambitious tyrants what makes any of us think we are prepared for another civil war?
How many of us have agreed to be licenses in order to do business? Indeed, there are certain enterprises that give cause to a government demanding
license in order to do business, but do book sellers and shoe makers actually need permission to make shoes and sell books? Of course, if book
sellers and shoe makers think they do need a license to do business they can't get that license until they have first applied for a "tax ID number"
with both federal and state tax collection agencies. But why? What tax has been laid upon the activity of shoe making and book selling?
We have become a hopelessly inept people and yet too many of us shout for all to hear that we have guns and we will use them! How many of those
people who have those guns actually went into an agreement with being licensed in order to enjoy their 2nd Amendment right? We have got the
government we deserve, indeed! We can fix the problem peacefully and reasonably or we can resort to chaos and violence, the choice, as it has always
been, is ours.