Climategate, Copenhagen, and The New World Order, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 39 times


reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 06:33 PM by Dogdish
Is this the website he (the hero that broke this story) referenced in the second video?
www.americaneedstoknow.com
www.americaneedstoknow.com...
It's down right now:
"This website is temporarily unavailable, please try again later."
Maybe they're getting hammered with hits, maybe there's hope.

[edit on 23-11-2009 by Dogdish]

[edit on 23-11-2009 by Dogdish]


reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 08:15 PM by ScientificDoomsdayMania
There is a saying that since money equals power in this materialistic world, the ones who have money control the world. There is another saying that any organization or nation that has the means of controlling the weather will ultimately control the world. However, a more effective and subtle way of controlling the masses is via controlling their minds. Mind control can be done with radiation and broadcasting frequencies, among other means. Once people’s minds are being monitored and manipulated, the illusion of choice is removed, and people are effectively programmed to act according to the dictates of those who control their minds. There is a common thread in all the important global issues that are facing the world. This common thread is world control. The world leaders are in effect being brain-washed into relinquishing their duties to protect their respective nations in the name of doing something for the higher good.

This would be all well and good if it could be believed that scientists are acting in the people’s best interests. But, since when have scientists been assumed to be altruistic? Why is it accepted that they will only act in the best interests of humans? And why should it be accepted that the scientists are correct about human causes of global warming?

Are not scientists responsible for developing biological, chemical, nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction that have been used to control, bully, harm or destroy certain groups and places? It is not so far fetched to say that many scientific developments are amoral.

So, should world leaders turn over their moral consciences to scientists who are knowingly or unwittingly working for the ruling elite? The ruling elite have their own agenda, which is definitely not in the best interests of the people.

The carbon-trading schemes, and other emissions-based solutions presented by the ruling elite’s scientific doomsdayers, will not solve global warming. But, if they get their way, they will change the lives of people for the worse. That is part of the ruling elite’s agenda.

© 2009 Amitakh Stanford

www.flyingbuffaloes7.net...


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 12:28 AM by thewind
reply to post by punterdeb

Monckton gave the same speech in michigan when he was here a few weeks ago. Glen Beck played it on his show also. Good stuff, and straight to the point. The american people better wake up, for time to do anything at all is rapidly running out.


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 12:15 PM by factbeforefiction
reply to post by punterdeb


Thank you for taking the time to make this your first post after 12 months. That should help people to understand how important this issue truly is.



reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 12:17 PM by factbeforefiction
reply to post by punterdeb


Thank you, the action you have taken is very important. I hope that we will be able to raise this thread so that other ATS members will be able to become involved before it is too late.


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 12:31 PM by havok
Ahh! It ALL begins!

We all know that this is going to happen. Just a matter of time.

So, lets see if this "treaty" get signed in December.

Is it unconstitutional???
Blog About the treaty
A few ideas of protesting the treaty

The latter is a pretty good site, check it!


Found this too!

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller reports: President Obama will make a decision if he will attend the December Copenhagen climate change summit in “the coming days,” a senior administration official said today.

“What the president has always said is that if it looks as though the negotiations have proceeded sufficiently that going to Copenhagen would give a final impetus, a push, to the process, then he would be willing to go,” the senior administration official, briefing reporters off camera said. “We’re making the judgment as to whether it makes sense for him to go.”


So Obama is mulling it over....hmm.

When 191 world leaders from the United Nations member states take part in the summit, which runs from December 7th to December 18th, they will be talking to reach a final, legally-binding agreement sometime next year. Yet, many only anticipate an accord that has an “immediate operation impact” coming out of the December summit.


But don't get yer panties ina bunch, because the agreement won't be "legal" until sometime next year.

Stock up!

[edit on 24-11-2009 by havok]


reply posted on 24-11-2009 @ 01:10 PM by LSDomino
reply to post by SirPatrickHenry


SPH thanks so much! that was the general vibe I got off of them so I decided t put that post up and see what people had to say

Thanks
thanks
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Startling revelations from a Swiss banking insider
  Posted 16 days ago with 28 member flags
Rothschild Speaks: Want\'s One World Currency
  Posted 7 days ago with 21 member flags
Let\'s Take Action - Awaken The Sheeple
  Posted 19 days ago with 15 member flags
ACTA and You - Important Video - It has Begun
  Posted 11 days ago with 15 member flags
Know Thine Enemy! Iran Warns of Coming Great Event.
  Posted 5 days ago with 12 member flags
MSM Try To Debunk Illuminati Denver Airport Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 10 member flags