Can anyone please help me out that knows physics very well?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 03:29 PM by john124
reply to post by seangkt



A lot of it is too complicated unless you go the path of degree level Physics, if you want to understand it greatly. If you're not bothered about the maths aspect to physics, then watching documentaries will help to understand qualitatively.

Although much of physics at cutting edge is so far beyond undergraduate level that you'd need a PhD in that particular area. And only those involved that research field truly understand it 100% as some of it is mind boggling and is beyond most people's comprehension.

[edit on 23-11-2009 by john124]



reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 03:45 PM by Aquarius1
reply to post by seangkt



Good for you, wish you luck in your endeavors, you may want to shoot Dr. Michio Kaku an email, he teaches physics at N.Y. City University and he may have some good advice for you.. mkaku@aol.com and check out his website mkaku.org


reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 05:46 PM by LightFantastic
I recommend 'Six Easy Pieces' followed by 'Six Not So Easy Pieces' by the inimitable Richard Feynman - see Amazon for a low cost introduction from one of the most brilliant and inspiring teachers in physics.

Definately check out all his books and read the Amazon reviews. Even his autobiography is a good read.


[edit on 23/11/2009 by LightFantastic]


reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 06:29 PM by argentus
Congratulations on discovering what interests you. People sometimes go through a college education and further without knowing what they are interested in.

I want to suggest a book to you that changed my life, and my understanding of physics and how it relates to me and how I relate to the particles that make up the universe. Here it is:
The Dancing Wu Li Masters, by Gary Zukav.

There was a Chinese landscape painter in the 1600's but that's not who the book is referring to. Wu Li -- and I can't find a link to substantiate this, but just something I remember from the book -- is [in some Chinese dialect] a word that means a) beauty, b) physics and c) patterns of organic energy.

That last definition is the one that stuck with me. I took a degree in Chemistry, with minors in physics and math. I didn't really learn to LOVE physics until I was out of school...... THAT'S when the questions started, and I wish I'd have had them earlier, because they lead me to a lifelong love and appreciation of the beauty of physics. No, I'm not an expert. You can be though.

Another, after that one -- Fearful Symmetry, by A. Zee. The title, taken from William Blake's poem - The Tyger:

Tyger, Tyger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry - Entire poem here

Also -- and I wish I hadn't given these all away, because they were very well written -- Isaac Asimov wrote a whole series of:

Understanding Physics: Motion, Sound, and Heat
Understanding Physics: Electromagntism
Understanding Physics: ? There were one or two others, but I can't recall the titles...


Have a wonderful ride!!! I envy you. I wish I could start fresh again, in these charged and wonderous times.

[edit on 23/11/09 by argentus]


reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 06:33 PM by ZombieJesus
reply to post by argentus




You beat me to it.
And I couldn't say it better myself, Wu-Li masters was a life changing book for me as well.




reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 07:08 PM by argentus
reply to post by seangkt



p.s. you want to know something? I seriously doubt if 50% of people who read A Brief History of Time understood 60% of it. Good on you!

Something else that occurs to me is that I've learned a lot from teaching. Now, I've never formally taught physics, but perhaps you might want to charge this thread with questions... you know there are a lot of very brilliant physics-afficianados here at ATS. Ultimately you cross into theoretical physics, and there lies the land that is yet undiscovered; it has been mapped out, but few claims have been staked.


reply to post by ZombieJesus



It's a wonderous book, isn't it? I have bought it five times, and given it away each time. Now, I find, that Amazon won't export books, CDs or electronics, so I guess I just have to feel the rosy glow of having passed it on.

cheers, friend


reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 07:10 PM by seangkt
reply to post by argentus



Thank you. I wish I would have started sooner I am 21 now and starting so it's not to late but I forgot bits and pieces of stuff from school since I have been out for so long which had a small effect on what classes I am in now and also I just wish I knew more now. I became interested in astronomy one night looking at the stars and went and borrowed a friends telescope and began to read nonstop and heard so much of astrophysics I began to look into physics and now I find myself with so many questions that I need to know the answers to. At first I found myself thinking maybe some things are better left unknown but now I must know the answers. Thank you for the suggestions and I was looking into chemistry around the time I realized I liked astronomy and kind of veered off but am still interested.


reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 07:16 PM by seangkt
reply to post by argentus




Haha I had to read it twice and I also had the audiobook and when I didn't know what he was talking about I would pause the audiobook and use wikipedia to read about whatever it was to get the idea and did that chapter by chapter until I understood what I could. It took me a couple weeks of dedicated time but since that was really the first physics books I finished and put time into understanding it has really changed me. I have question after question after reading the book and now I want to learn everything.


reply posted on 23-11-2009 @ 07:20 PM by argentus
reply to post by seangkt



You're very welcome. I wish I knew more so I could help more. It has been said that Einstein began his career with the question: Why does light have no acceration period? How can it instantly manifest itself at its attributed lightspeed?

I don't know if that's true, or a romanticism of his works and life, but I do think it's a valid question, and, incidentally, one that hasn't really been fully answered yet.

I've been working on a paper for more than 20 years. I'd love it if someone with more brains than myself could pick it up and make something wonderful -- that would validate the time spent on it, you know?

Here's what I wondered: What if lightspeed isn't a constant, but an ever-increasing quantity, starting with the big singularity at the beginning, and increasing in a small, hardly measurable quantity up to the present?

Obviously, it is impossible to prove or disprove such a query, given the short period of time humans have been measuring lightspeed. Not only that....... just thinking along those lines tends toward fiddling with the Hubble Constant, and who has the stones to try and do that???? Not me. At least not until the math works. ha!!!
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



The secrets hidden in the pyramids. A real eye opener!
  Posted 7 days ago with 188 member flags
6 Real People With Mind-Blowing Mutant Superpowers
  Posted 6 days ago with 90 member flags
a drop of water orbiting a nitting needle in space
  Posted 7 days ago with 69 member flags
Top 10 Most Incredible Pieces Of Nanoscale Art
  Posted 11 days ago with 43 member flags
The Danger of Microwave Ovens
  Posted 6 days ago with 20 member flags