it's a complex diplomatic situation obama finds himself in. blaming him for it is only a tenth of the story.
Interests, not emotions, dominate the world of realpolitik.
this is an astute observation, there's not much any president can do, diplomatically, when his predecessor has left him with a ruined economy and a
military over-extended by unpopular and illegal wars.
china is supporting the US economy because of the economic policies of the past ten years or so. you also need to consider that the US refused to take
part in kyoto for the sake of the US economy, saying the evidence for climate change was dubious, it's not really going to be taken seriously if the
US now asks china to retard its economic growth for the sake of climate change.
on the military/dearmament issue, the US has indicated clearly that it can't afford to do anything to help japan or china against NK. why would they
disarm when there nut case neighbor is arming.
there's also the underlying wrankel that the US has refused to acknowledge that the CIA torture people even though it prosecuted japanese people for
the same practices on US POW's and the US criticism of chinese human rights abuses (detainment without trial anyone).
to think it's about obama, as a person, is to ignore reality.