It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zelong
Originally posted by Imagir
I hope that finally India, China and Japan begin to raise the veil of lies that has been, until yesterday, monopoly of NASA and that they come unhooked from the blackmail of the USA.
I haven't used Google Earth/Moon for some time.The first thing I noticed was some extra names on the bottom of screen Jaxa,Selene I thought great better pictures from Jaxa on Google.From what you have stated Imagir can we trust these Google Moon images?
"This (the magnetic field) is being discovered for the first time," said Bhardwaj. The moon does not generate a global' magnetic field, but some lunar rocks are magnetised. These generate magnetic bubbles, which divert the incoming protons to the surrounding regions.
The Swedish Institute of Space Physics, which is the European Principal Investigator for the SARA payload, made the finding while investigating why 20 per cent of protons hitting the moon's surface in the form of solar winds got reflected as hydrogen molecule.
Originally posted by malcr
Originally posted by whattheh
I can see the moon hoax people posting on this thread right now.
I wonder how many times this will be posted here "See they could nto have survived on the moon because of the radiation"
That depends on the level of radiation at the time of the landings and the duration of the astronauts exposure.
Can you provide figures showing that such speculation is idle. If you can't then your assertion that they could have landed on the moon (due to a lack of radiation) is no more valid than the opposing argument.