Originally posted by The Shrike

Originally posted by mckyle

Originally posted by Imagir
And hope tha the "Knight" Zorgon return as soon on ATS!

Be careful what you wish for.
It might come true

If enough issue counter wishes we can neutralize it! Zorgon was a detriment to this forum. He never contributed, just busted chops. Please, don't wake the dead!

I totally agree.

For the less seasoned ATS's, he was setting a bad example in terms of erroneous analysis, and I'm sorry to say, dishonesty.

And I will leave it at that.

Another interesting "anomaly" craters' chain into tha same STRIP.

There are also these interesting "digital (?)" "glich (?)" anomalies nearby....

Originally posted by The Shrike

Originally posted by mckyle

Originally posted by Imagir
And hope tha the "Knight" Zorgon return as soon on ATS!

Be careful what you wish for.
It might come true

If enough issue counter wishes we can neutralize it! Zorgon was a detriment to this forum. He never contributed, just busted chops. Please, don't wake the dead!

Whilst you are all kissing each others asses and ripping into absent members (which I thought wasn't allowed on here) and still debating in a thread that armap debunked on page one, have you seen just how many threads zorgon started and the replies, flags and stars he received?

Never contributed? You are kidding right? Quite ironic that most of the threads he posted we're exactly like this one, which all of you wholeheartedly lapped up.

Originally posted by mrsoul2009
Great job! Mitchell is one of the most credible people speaking out.

I'm not following you. What do these lunar photos have to do with Ed Mitchell being right? Did he claim to have encountered anomalous structures on his moon flight?

Originally posted by ArMaP
I hope you understand that you are looking at several photos taken at different occasions, from several different missions, right?
That's why the photos look different and superimposing them makes visible seams.

Okay so lets do this right... since I see many lines and odd markings... and since seams are usually big pieces of photos... perhaps you would be so kind as to point out the ones that are seams.

That way we can eliminate those and just look at the rest...

Rather than give people the impression that all the markings are seam lines



Now go out and buy a bottle of non-alcohol champagne and live a little

Originally posted by zorgon
Okay so lets do this right... since I see many lines and odd markings... and since seams are usually big pieces of photos... perhaps you would be so kind as to point out the ones that are seams.

OK.

In this photo

I think I can see six different photos, like this:

It's possible that the magenta and yellow areas are from the same photo.

Now go out and buy a bottle of non-alcohol champagne and live a little

That's part of my plan.