reply to post by factbeforefiction
No bud, you're the one who's wrong. I guess I could attack you back and say that you obviously didn't read my initial post but I'll just assume
you lack reading comprehension. I distinctly said in my very first post that I found it to be a very interesting topic but could not take a hard
stance either way because of the insubstantial amount of evidence provided.
Now you could have ignored my post, you could have explained why this evidence was convincing to you but instead you decided to take the oh so high
road of attacking everything that I said and not responding to any of my questions or comments.
Do you really expect people to take what you have to say seriously when you spout off ignorant little jabs that don't contribute to the discussion in
any way shape or form? Instead of conversing back and forth the thread has disolved into a pile of you name calling and me trying to defend myself.
It's pathetic.