It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

white ufo filmed in HD

page: 20
12
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 11:10 AM
link   
reply to post by TravisT
 

You might not think it is ufo. But I have made several points, like many others, as to why this can't be a umbrella.
*Pole missing
*Infront of bush due to the angular edge still clearly there which would have been blocked by the bush had it been behind it.
*Maybe analysis will say even more odd things about this vid.

You can't rule anything about this ufo out without being ignorant.




posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 11:12 AM
link   
reply to post by ZombieJesus
 

I have sent original footage silly. Stop lying.



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 11:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by maxxseeYou can't rule anything about this ufo out without being ignorant.


People have given reasons as to why the pole to the umbrella could be hidden (shadows, etc...). You see it as being in front of the bush, but pretty much everyone else who looks at the same pictures see it as behind. You are even hoping for the analysis to bring up "more odd" things?

You can't rule out this is a man-made structure (umbrella, gazebo) without being ignorant.



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 11:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Bluemcgee
 

That might have been a bold statement from me.

However ppl who claim it is infront of the bush really have no proof of this at all. My argument of the angular shape still visible still holds its ground. Aswell as the no visible pole which is also strange. You can also see it clearly infront of the pole. Everything points to it being in mid air.
It might not be if it would have been attatched to something, but I find that very unlikely.
Yes I do hope something odd is found that kills this silly umbrella suggestion for good. It doesn't even look like an umbrella with the firm shape and no spaces at bottom. Also the angle inwards does NOT look like something else than a ufo that I've heard yet.



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 11:31 AM
link   
reply to post by maxxsee
 


Honestly? I do see it as being cut off by the bush, and thus behind it, and I do see it as being behind the pole. I've seen every image posted and have come to that conclusion. Also, it does look similar to an umbrella, slightly tilted, and looked down upon. Or some kind of gazebo, structure like that.

I'd like to say that "we all see what we want," but that's not really fitting. I'd like to see a craft... I just don't. I see a structure.



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 11:31 AM
link   
Even I beginning to get a bit annoyed.

I've read your responses now for quite awhile now OP.
And you are turning everything we say into something that will fit into your beliefs. This is what I talked about before.

You want this to be true so much that you are even unable to consider it to be an umbrella behind the pole and bushes.

You said somewhere that there is nothing beneath it ( if I remember correctly ) so it must be hovering.

Then when someone says, I think I see some kind of a structure like a tripod, you turn that around and say: It must be a forcefield.

I bet if we found a pixel that was pointing out from the "umbrella" you would say...It's a laser gun.
I can accept that you believe it to be a genuine alien craft. But what I don't like is that you just won't look at the image as it is.
You keep argue about posting the video with sound etc,
So much fuzz for so little.

You do understand what you get a not so nice image from others here right?

I can tell you why.

1. Like I said before, you twist everything so it will fit to what you want it to be.

2. You arguments of NOT posting the RAW material with sound is vague. Normally you shouldn't even argue against it. You want people to believe you, then you also have to meet them halfway and grant them their wishes as well.
None of us can't understand why you don't want us to hear your breathing?
You doin something kinky??
The thing is...if you remove the sound, then it is edited.
If you bring the file into any kind of a program...it seizes to be a RAW file. Programs will add META-Tags and such.

And the above pictures shows us it is not perfectly symmetrical. left side has a diffrent shape then the right side of the "ufo".
You said earlier it must be infront, since it is symmetrical and that the bothe ends had an angle. can't really see that in the zoomed in picture.



But again.
You live there right??
THEN ASK THE NEIGHBOURS ABOUT THE CLIP!!!....
I mean...AAARGH!!!!
They WILL know if they have an umbrella at that spot during the summers or not.

[edit on 23-11-2009 by Akezzon]



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 11:55 AM
link   
Beware OP.... if you are proven to be a phony, this guy could follow you.





posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 12:33 PM
link   
Just wondering i have looked over this thread and i have no idea where this is supposed to be. It is my opinion that this is a still picture with a UFO photoshoped in and bird added in to give the illusion of it being a movie.
If i am wrong please show me where there is any motion in this video besides the bird.
I was wondering what is the name of the place he is fliming? There must be something special about it for him to go out set up a cam and just happen to get a UFO. If we get a location we can get some pics of the area without a UFO and compare them to the video so we get a better idea of what we are looking at. I think once we get a location and other pics of it we could put this issue to rest.
I mean people are not exactly eating this up. 19 some pages and 11 flags, i have seen personal reptilian account threads with no evidence (is there any other kind?) get more flags and less posts. Even the 100% i will believe anything open skulled crowd is not even buying this.

[edit on 23-11-2009 by zaiger]



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 01:20 PM
link   
reply to post by zaiger
 




There are people ( a person?) walking away walking away next to the tree on the right of the umbrella at around 5 seconds in.

Possibly the OP's friends putting the object in position?

Who knows.

Does look like a still but it is a movie.
It's so edited that it's difficult to tell.


But a member of staff is working on the unedited, raw version of this ridiculous video as we speak.
Should have some answers soon.

[edit on 23/11/09 by blupblup]



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 01:28 PM
link   
reply to post by blupblup
 


Sorry, i guess I was watching it in lower quality or it was freezing up on me or somthing. Was there an explanation on why these people were walking away from a "ufo" that was no more than 20 feet away from them?

[edit on 23-11-2009 by zaiger]



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by zaiger
 




No worries man.

And an explanation...having read the thread do you honestly think that the OP would offer up an explanation for that?
Have they for anything else?

Nope, no explanation.


As i said.... i think it's perhaps the OP's friends.
And that's why the OP was reluctant to provide the unedited and raw video footage.

I dunno.


Your guess is as good as mine my friend

[edit on 23/11/09 by blupblup]



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 01:44 PM
link   
reply to post by blupblup
 


well from what i have read the people in the video will be explained as
1. " I did not notice them till now, they might be aliens getting out of the UFO.

or

2. "I also slowed it down when i added the pan effect, they are really running because they are affraid of it"




posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 02:04 PM
link   
reply to post by zaiger
 






Yes....indeed, very true.


or

3. They are actually coming through a dimensional portal and it wasn't until i watched the footage back that i noticed it.



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 02:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Akezzon
 

Firstly the screens taken at different times in video seem to have different shapes for some reason. If this is due to the object shapeshifting somewhat or due to the filmbitrate distorting the object somewhat I do not know.

Second you have to understand that I am fully entitled to my belief. I don't care how many ppl spam fake or umbrella. To me that idea just doesn't make sense.
No one has posted a screen clearly showing it behind the bush. I have posted several that shows it infront of pole.
How can you say this doesn't appear to be infront of pole?


And no sharp edge to the right??

As you now can see there is absolutely NO proof it is behind the bush. In fact judging from the sharp angle to righ it IS infront just like I've said al along. Why else would the edge be so sharp to the right.
Believe what you may.



[edit on 23-11-2009 by maxxsee]

[edit on 23-11-2009 by maxxsee]



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 02:22 PM
link   
reply to post by maxxsee
 


1. Do you even know what Symmetrical shaps are? The angles are different = Not symmetrical.

2. Get your ASS over to that house, show them the video, tell them what we are discussing here and let them answer or invite them here.

3. I have posted several pics as well that shows that it might be behind.
So no matter how many pics you post we will end up at square one again.

4. You did it again. Now you saying that it is probably shapeshifting... AMAGAAD. You are just unwilling to take in consideration that it MIGHT be an umbrella... To you it is TOTALLY impossible that it is an umbrella, while we try to tell you that it MIGHT be an UFO and it MIGHT be an umbrella.
But from what we see our money are getting bet on the umbrella.

I think this will be my last post. We are getting nowhere.



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 02:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by maxxseeAs you now can see there is absolutely NO proof it is behind the bush.


What? Why is it that you get to post a picture where it appears to be in front of the pole/bush and say there's absolutely NO proof it is behind the bush, but when others post a picture where it appears to be behind, you won't accept there is NO proof it is in front?

It's all a bit closed-minded and ignorant, really.



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 02:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Bluemcgee
 




The funny thing is that even in the second picture down is the OP's last post, it's clearly behind the pole.
The pole is blatantly visible.



That one...


So the OP's attempts to prove it's in front of the pole have clearly backfired



[edit on 23/11/09 by blupblup]



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 02:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by blupblupThe funny thing is that even in the second picture down is the OP's last post, it's clearly behind the pole.
The pole is blatantly visible.


I didn't even notice that. It is pretty visible!


I really don't know how the OP can be so convinced it's a craft of some sort and not willing to hear/see other possibilities, especially since he apparently didn't even see it with his own two eyes. And then the whole drama of not uploading the raw video because of heavy breathing? How heavy was that breathing?!

I'm no expert when it comes to UFOs or Video Analysis, but I have been using my eyes for two and half decades and that object is very umbrella-like.

Or, you know, it's an alien craft emitting some force field that nobody can see... not even the people a few meters away... and not even the guy filming the thing. Makes much more sense.



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 02:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bluemcgee


I didn't even notice that. It is pretty visible!




Yes...yes it is.
I mean plenty of shots have been posted throughout the thread showing it behind the pole... but for the OP to produce one himself, debunking his own stupid theory... is just pure comedy genius









I'm no expert when it comes to UFOs or Video Analysis, but I have been using my eyes for two and half decades and that object is very umbrella-like.



Exactly how i feel.
I am no expert in video analysis but i do have pretty much 20/20 vision and my eyes have served me well for 30 years.

Why it's even being analysed is beyond me?



posted on Nov, 23 2009 @ 03:12 PM
link   
This thread has gone beyond ridiculous now



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 17  18  19    21  22  23 >>

log in

join