Who's actually keeping the fur industry kept afloat these days? Are the chinese partial to animal fur?
It is quite funny that people disagree with the use of animal fur... but leather is okay. 10/10 for logic!
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
reply to post by Bluebelle
What about feathers?
What about bone jewelry?
What about products that are inedible but that contain gelatin?
What about all of these:
www.vegfamily.com...
If you're going to be consistent, be vegan.
I'm not vegan.
But for the record, I do not use products from the rainforest or eat meat that has been farmed there. I do not wear fur, I only wear leather made from friends who use the entire animal when they slaughter it. I eat free range and local meats and poultry.
[edit on 11/20/2009 by ravenshadow13]
Originally posted by RoyalCanadian
reply to post by tensetek
your babies are dogs and cats?
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
reply to post by Bluebelle
It is, in my mind, more morally acceptable to kill one animal for meat, leather, and bones instead of killing three animals: one for meat, one for leather, and one for bones and disposing all the parts that you aren't specifically using.
But, like all things, this is but a matter of opinion.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
Cruelty is wrong yes, but cruelty in the way animals are slaughtered isnt confined to the fur industry, and not just in china. You'll probably be boycotting your own country if your grounds for doing it are based on that.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
I just dont see that it makes it more morally correct to kill an animal for 3 uses instead of 1. Its still a animal being killed for products that we dont actually need. There is a demand for those things, but they could be phased out and switched for alternatives that dont include electrocuting, cutting throats & whatever else of animals.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
I suppose china could always argue that the use of dog fur is a by-product seeing as they use dog in some of their dishes though.