It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by infinite
5% of the European population can force a debate in the European Parliament , including possible legislation too.
Originally posted by infinite
reply to post by AlwaysQuestion
Herman van Rompuy promised to be a chairmen, unlike Blair - who wanted to travel the world as a President with real executive power. Germany was worried that a "President Blair" - with political aspiration and ambition - could create potential political damage for certain regions in the European Union.
Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
No we don't. We just notice how stupid rules are implemented by a huge bureaucracy that doesn't seem to care what the general public wants or needs.
Originally posted by Dermo
No it's not. The EU pretty much already equals authoritarian dictatorship and nationalism is the only meaningful alternative.
Wrong. We've been losing more and more of our rights for years and this goes way beyond our " right to screw over the less fortunate".
Originally posted by Dermo
Thats because the public cant be trusted to do the right thing.. left to our own devices, the vast majority of people in the capitalist system will destroy everything around them in the pursuit of success and or greed.
Originally posted by Dermo
Absolute rubbish, with lisbon.. as well as voting our MEP's, our parliaments have direct involvement with EU policy and the EU parliament is getting more powerful in the overall running of the EU by the day.. AND as the positions become more powerful, the democratic process will be transferred to those positions.
Originally posted by Dermo
. Thats EU policy. Its also EU policy to leave economic and political sovereignty in the hands of member states to a reasonable extent in order to ensure the competitive markets between member states and global players.. Business is business and a successful superstate cannot be run with bad business.
Originally posted by Dermo
BTW Nationalism is rubbish!!
Originally posted by Dermo
May I ask where you are from?
Originally posted by Dermo
Give me an idea of one.. Just one little simple law/loss of rights that the EU has pushed on us that has nothing to do with Environmentalism or Social fairness/equality.
Originally posted by Dermo
And don't give me a law that a member state has pushed. I want to hear one of these draconian, authoritarian laws that our evil dictator NWO leaders in the EU have forced on our helpless little souls.
Originally posted by Sunlionspirit
wrong wrong wrong !!!! Europ does NOT want to limit freedom of the different people.
Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
One example I can think of, is the attempt by the EU to apply draconian censorship laws (so-called "hate laws") in all member states. I'm not sure this has been succesful, though, since I haven't been following the progress.
Originally posted by Dermo
Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
One example I can think of, is the attempt by the EU to apply draconian censorship laws (so-called "hate laws") in all member states. I'm not sure this has been succesful, though, since I haven't been following the progress.
Thats not a draconian law and it falls under the category of Social equality.. Sorry
Originally posted by Dermo
And Im pretty certain it was more of a suggestion, not a legislative procedure.. seeing as the EU really had very little say in issues like that in member states.
Originally posted by Dermo
I get what you are saying about the EU being detached from the people but their social safety and human rights policies are obviously for the people which is a lot more than not doing anything for the average person.
Originally posted by Dermo
Everyone will see different things in regards the EU, I see a good and secure future in an ever changing and evolving world. Many of the people on this site see only bad conspiracies surrounding it.. Many of which do not make any sense.
Originally posted by Dermo
Globalized trade blocs are the evolution of the human civilization.. if you are against them for any reasons other than realistic issues, then you are simply against change and clearly fearful of the unknown.
Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
Who says I'm not against them because of real issues, like the exploitation of the Third World, extreme pollution, corrosion of culture, ...
Originally posted by infinite
5% of the European population can force a debate in the European Parliament , including possible legislation too.
Originally posted by Dermo
The EU has forced EU states to cut down on emissions and pollution since the 70's. The rest of the developed world is only catching up now.. and the EU are constantly raising the bar. So tell me how the EU causes pollution?
Tell me how the EU and not member state business is exploiting the Third World.