Must See Video : Lindsey Graham - Eric Holder !, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 21 times
Topic started on 18-11-2009 @ 09:30 PM by Eurisko2012
Republican Lindsey Graham destroys Eric Holder.
Lindsey Graham - Rambo

Bookmark this Youtube webpage!
Republican Lindsey Graham takes Eric Holder to the woodshed.
Attorney General Eric Holder shows himself to be nervous and
unprepared. This is bad history.


[edit on 18-11-2009 by Eurisko2012]

[edit on 18-11-2009 by Eurisko2012]

[edit on 18-11-2009 by Eurisko2012]

[edit on 18-11-2009 by Eurisko2012]


reply posted on 18-11-2009 @ 10:08 PM by HotSauce
reply to post by Eurisko2012



Thanks for sharing that video. Everyone should take time to watch this whatever your political leanings are or what country you are from. Lindsey Graham makes some great points.

Graham does a great job of stating the very negative implications of the AG trying to try terrorists/enemy combatants in particular in civil court. It just opens up the possibility that much will be thrown out of court since these people didn't receive Miranda rights before being interrogated.

For those of you who do not want to click through to youtube I posted the video here. Hope you do not mind Eurisko.




[edit on 18-11-2009 by HotSauce]


reply posted on 18-11-2009 @ 10:14 PM by Eurisko2012
reply to post by HotSauce



No problem. Thanks.
I heard tonight that New York wants $75 Million for security
for the KSM trial. It looks like about $100 Million total for this
circus!



reply posted on 18-11-2009 @ 10:20 PM by HotSauce
reply to post by Eurisko2012



That is amazing. Earlier in a thread I guessed it would be 300 million after it is all said and done and all the costs to the taxpayer are factore in. I still think I might come out on the low end.


reply posted on 18-11-2009 @ 11:47 PM by Seiko
reply to post by jam321



Obama said earlier they'd be found guilty and get the death penalty. There was a thread about it.

Yes op, holder seemed to not be properly prepared for this one.


reply posted on 18-11-2009 @ 11:56 PM by jam321
reply to post by Seiko



Obama might have said it, but does he mean it.

Many people outside of the US already sees the death penalty as torture.

I think Obama wants to avoid being tied to the word "torture"

Death penalty will merely be an option to satisfy Americans.

Could you imagine the outcry if Holder wasn't opened to the death penalty?


reply posted on 18-11-2009 @ 11:59 PM by Seiko
reply to post by jam321



Yes I'm sure he means it.

What worries me here is that holder seems so uneducated on the history of law. I can't say I'm much better, but I'm not the attorney general. I expect him to sound a tad more knowledgeable.



reply posted on 19-11-2009 @ 12:15 AM by sos37
Originally posted by Seiko
reply to
post by jam321



Obama said earlier they'd be found guilty and get the death penalty. There was a thread about it.



WAIT WAIT WAIT

If their guilt has already been decided, least of all by the president, then why go through the charade and circus of a "trial", and in New York no less? Isn't the point of a criminal trial to find an unbiased venue???

Isn't this really just so Obama's lawyers can go through the diatribe about how terrible torture and waterboarding is and how badly these guys were treated?


reply posted on 19-11-2009 @ 08:41 AM by Bad Dog
Holder isn't interested in justice. He's just interested in money.

Michelle Malkin

If you’ve been paying attention, you already know all about AG Eric Holder and his DOJ staff’s national security conflict of interest as senior partner with Covington & Burling — the prestigious Washington, D.C. law firm, which represents 17 Yemenis currently held at Gitmo.



reply posted on 19-11-2009 @ 09:14 AM by rangersdad
reply to post by Eurisko2012



Graham brings up a good point about terrorists rights if they are brought to a civil court. I bet the military commanders never once thought the captured on the battlefield would be allowed a lawyer and read Miranda rights. NOW what is the military supposed to do whenever they catch someone? What are the new rules they must follow when interrogating prisoners? Holder needs to be replaced by someone who knows what he/she is doing if he cant answer basic questions such as this to Mr Graham.



reply posted on 19-11-2009 @ 10:18 AM by j2000
Originally posted by Seiko
reply to
post by jam321



Obama said


When is the other half of the country going to wake up and realize that this is the statement when questions should start. It is the obligation of of the citizens of the United States of America to question any and all public figures.
If one awesomes they are either lying or do not know of what they speak, our country would not be in the shape it is today.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^