posted on Nov, 20 2009 @ 09:57 AM
Originally posted by topsecretombomb
This is complete total hogwash. As I recall, people who were listed as hijackers for 9/11 came forward and claimed they were not a part of the
But alive and well in their home countries!? If their intel was wrong about these guys, what makes you all think they could find the 'mastermind'
behind the whole operation????
TSTB, this is the real puzzle. There are three probable scenarios at least to my thinking that could have caused 9/11. Getting to the bottom of it is
improbable if not impossible but we can and will continue to speculate with hopes of at least for our own minds coming to a conclusion.
1st scenario - The radical Islamists did this on their own as advertised in the MSM. The US government mostly looked the other way having knowledge of
the pending attacks and used the aftermath as a reason to further a number of politcal agendas. And... as you mention if a number of FBI reported
hijackers showed up alive, oops! They piled it on a little thick!
2nd scenario - The US government created this disaster, blamed the Islamists and furthered a number of political agendas. The radical Islamists,
nearly as adept as the US government in turning lemons into lemonade, admitted it was they when blamed. They had failed once before, far be it from
them to not take the martyrdom dumped in their laps. Thus furthering their agenda of a global Islamist state. That living hijackers showed up in the
aftermath, why of course that would happen! They didn't do it.
3rd scenario - The US government having prior knowledge of the planned attacks, cut girders in the towers, ran a NORAD training session and more to
insure the severity of devastation from the radical Islamist attacks. Thus furthering political agendas. And again extra hijackers, oops! Our bad!
None of these scenarios are pleasing to any of us but I think they are the possibilities within reason. I think it gets wittled down to these three
scenarios all of which take into account the largely unexplained factual evidence or lack thereof. That includes scanty video from airport terminals,
living hijackers, NORAD stand down, tower 7, Bushes' reaction and so much more. Just my unexpert opinion.
My point is you are not alone in thinking that this creep possibly had nothing to do with the attack and is just accepting the "mastermind" moniker
because it enhances his Islamist standing. One might argue that Allah would look unkindly on a liar but his accepting the blame would further Allah's
kingdom in the eyes of this zealot and others. And he would likely have wanted to cause this damage if he could have.