Originally posted by AirWitch
Even historically there seems no precedence for this (although our population and technology certainly make observation more likely).
But, are we entering an area of space that is dirtier than what we’ve previously been in? At this rate, we might just get hit by something larger in the next few years ... (2012 anyone?)
Just to address this part of your post, which I neglected to do before, and also to expand on what was said in the other thread I linked to in my previous relpy above:
You said it right there, but it's not just that we are better at detecting/photographing them...
As I have said many times in the past on this forum, if you come to this subject with out much prior knowledge of it, it can seem that there are more events like this, but what you should keep in mind are that a number of factors will have a heavy influence on your perception.
For an individual, seeing an event like this is usually a lucky once in a lifetime experience. Few get to see two, since events like this are random although they do happen fairly frequently somewhere in the world. Of course the world is a big place, and the vast majority of it's surface is sea or uninhabited. Most of our population is highly concentrated into small areas, and the rest is sparsely or even virtually uninhabited. Also, daylight probably hides a large proportion of events.
They were always occurring, but because there were not many cameras (CCTV, digi-cams, camera networks devoted to looking 24/7 for these kinds of events, US DoD satellites, etc...), we did not know just how frequent they were. Researchers themselves are only just becomming aware of the frequency of small sized objects like this, and that is partly due to better communications and news gathering.
Previously, if an event like this was observed in a locality, the local news would pick up on it (if that - sometimes it might just be written off as a "ufo sighting" since many people are unaware what a bright meteor/fireball can look like, and how confusing it can sometimes be for the uninitiated) and that was it. The mainstream news would never pick up on it.
Today, thanks partly to massive increase in fireballs captured on camera, and many competitive news networks hungry for ratings, exciting footage of a fireball will often result in it making the mainstream news.
For every one that does, there must be at least ten or twenty that are observed/reported that don't make the mainstream news, but those of us who follow these events hear about, and probably again at least as many that are not reported at all due to the reasons I mentioned above.
I don't think that there is any evidence to suggest that these type of events are becoming more frequent. I do think we are still trying to establish a "baseline" for the frequency of these types of events (something that might have been done by now if the US DoD was more willing to share data with scientists, but it's a prickly issue with world security potentially at stake!).
I also think the public needs some general education about these type of events to try and dispel many of the myths that are associated with them. My personal experience has been that even many experienced astronomers and sky watchers who do not specialize in this field are not aware of a whole host of aspects concerning meteors, so you are not alone in that respect.
After just having written all of that I read the link you posted. Nice find by the way - bookmarking the link for future reference!
[edit on 18-11-2009 by C.H.U.D.]





I would love to see that!


