Why do we even have war anymore?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 17-11-2009 @ 10:29 AM by dizzie56
In the old days, there was a motivation for going to war...the spoils. Gold and glory. There was a definate "victory" in war when the opposing side gave up or were wiped off the face of the earth or forced to move to another geographical area. What is "victory" today in the wars that we are fighting? Is the US ever going to reap the spoils of war from Iraq? Some people on here would say that we have thru having to rebuild a society using our companies, but that really isnt the spoils of war here.

Also, Afganistan. What the hell is the point, honestly? In the old days, a revenge war would end in the annihaltion of your enemy. Today, people get all touchy feely of how we treat our enemies so much that it hinders the military to do its traditional job.

I honestly long for the old way of doing things. The stuff was much more clear. When we fought Germany and Japan there was a definate victory that was set and obtained. With the two wars that we are fighting now, I dont see a definate victory. I just see the US using its military power to show the world that we still have it. I could understand if we were actually fighting the wars like we are suppossed to which is going after everybody and everything that makes a move against us but we are binding our own hands. Every time a bomb drops and there is collateral damage (which is just a reality in war), its like the world has a heart attack. Yeah, its not cool to bomb children, we get that. But, there is no way in the world that you can make every bomb go exactly where it wants to be and only kill the "bad guys". It just doesnt work like that. The people with the loudest mouths go all huffy puffy when something like that happens in war but they dont realize that it is WAR and its impossible for it to be 100% clean.


reply posted on 17-11-2009 @ 11:38 AM by DrumsRfun
reply to post by andy1033



In the old days the kings would be in the battlefield as well.
Do you think we would still have wars if little suit and tie wimps like Obama and Bush had to do that??

I personally would like to re-invent how we do war to suit the society of today.(its a sick society so don't blame me)
I think we should get the leaders who wanted it and throw them in a cage to fight til the death of one of them.
I bet they wouldn't be declaring war very quickly would they??

But there is still the loophole that people would just elect muscle bound presidents.


I would love to see a good ufc fight with the leader of Iran and the leader of Isreal to put an end to it.
Now THAT would be a good ppv.


reply posted on 17-11-2009 @ 02:48 PM by disfugured
reply to post by Enrikez



I'd also like to add religion.

Religion keeps people divided.

As long as you have a corrupt/greedy world that's divided, there will always be war.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^