Someone who works stone in architecture is called a banker mason. It is still done today and there is virtually no building technique we could not do today that has been done in the past.

It's a matter of time, effort and money though. So before everyone starts asking about baalbek and giza, if you can provide the monetary resources to make it happen, I and many other people and or companies can build you better and bigger pyramids. :-)

having said that, yes, crop circles are a silly medium to try and communicate with a race of people who live on ground level, listen to radios and televisions, have internet and all sorts of other ways of communicating, heck, we can project images into a point in space using lasers.

crop circles are man made. there is no evidence to indicate otherwise. There is hearsay, rumors and data that cannot be repeated or reconstructed. And that's about it.

Once the hoax is old, move on, there's always someone older than you to call you on it.

I find that ats seems to be quite the place for dredging up material that was debunked years ago. Fascinating!

Irregardless of being a 'scientist' and how many awards they have, people that lecture for profit in the paranormal money machine, and the venues they all commonly flock to, with DVD's in hand, is not indicitive of the methods of acceptance used in mainstream science.

If information like this came from the likes of Hawking or Kaku, well that is a different story altogether. You will never hear a theory from the likes of these real world scientists that is not based upon hard evidence backed up with the mathematics of physics.

There is no room in science for theories based upon unsubstantiated conjecture.

That is why what is offered here has to be sold, like in a circus.

Originally posted by charlyv
Irregardless of being a 'scientist' and how many awards they have, people that lecture for profit in the paranormal money machine, and the venues they all commonly flock to, with DVD's in hand, is not indicitive of the methods of acceptance used in mainstream science.

If information like this came from the likes of Hawking or Kaku, well that is a different story altogether. You will never hear a theory from the likes of these real world scientists that is not based upon hard evidence backed up with the mathematics of physics.

There is no room in science for theories based upon unsubstantiated conjecture.

That is why what is offered here has to be sold, like in a circus.

No. What he is saying fits perfectly within his theory. But never mind. Suit yourself.