Originally posted by Goathief
Originally posted by Majiq
Nope, changes nothing. It does show however that you will make statements out of thin air that have no proof what so ever behind them.
Oh how naive and wrong you are. 
The court validated our concern that there is illegal and unregulated Internet gambling in Kentucky. He has given these parties 30 days to
effectively block any access to this illegal activity within the commonwealth of Kentucky or they may be forced to forfeit those domain names to the
commonwealth.”
Judge Wingate’s ruling states that if internet gambling sites take action to block users in Kentucky from accessing the site using geo-targeting
technologies, then they “shall be relieved from the effects of the Seizure Order and from any further proceedings in the instant civil forfeiture
action.”
www.pokernewsdaily.com...
Wikileaks shut down: commons.globalintegrity.org...
Other examples:
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.wsws.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.guardian.co.uk...
Seeing as it's now gone 3am here I'm sure you can type those magic keywords into google and see what comes up... if you're lucky.
ok, so I went to the links you provided and this is what I found.
1 - Only one of those articles listed any domains that were supposedly blocked, and that was one regarding the KY gambling thing. Upon inspection I
found that I was able to access all of the sites that were listed.. BOO #1
2 - The article about David Rohde's capture was about the NY Times and Wiki's attempt at censoring it, not the Government...BOO #2
3 - As Far as your Wiki article about Google censorship, well I went to Google, typed in "Nude Teens" and got about 1,600,000 hit with 1 being
removed for violation of Child Porn laws... If you consider that censorship I will take it.. BOO #3
4 - Your World Socialist Web Site link lists no evidence to back its claims that site had been shut down... BOO #4
5 - In your link with the map, the US is only listed as selectively censoring sites in the social category because of its limited ability to block
child porn sites and the like. once again, if you consider blocking cp sites censorship then that is your problem... BOO #5
6 - The Wikileaks thing was a CA court thing, not our gov. and as you stated yourself it is back up... BOO #6
7 - Your last link is a flowchart that has something to do with the UK censoring Scorpions album covers.. US isn't even mentioned... BOO #7
Well, it seems that you get a great big
BOO
and a
to boot... Keep trying though, you may come up with something useful.
