South Tower Video - Discuss

Originally posted by Donny 4 million
So you were in the Army Corp when they screwed up New Orleans?
Did you help build Three Mile Island when you retired?
When did you do some of the work for the twins?

Is there an actual point in there somewhere Donny?

Originally posted by benoni
theres something about terrans posts that make me Q his sincerity...

What type of engineering are you qualified in terran.....

You seem very proficient in name calling and nastiness, yet you registered less than a month ago....!!

"something" makes you question my sincerity?

ROFL spare us your babble..of course you question it...cause I don't buy into your truther crap like some truther sheeple

What does when I registered have to do with anything?

Paranoid much?

NOTICE: MODERATOR ADVISORY

This is a reminder that courtesy is mandatory and steps are being taken to eliminate rude, disruptive behavior from our forums.

Members are advised to avoid such behavior and thereby avoid consequences that may include temporary suspension of posting privileges or permanent account termination.

Please stay on topic and avoid ANY commentary whatsoever, whether considered "insulting" or not, regarding the person or characteristics of any member. ANY such commentary is off topic and subject to warning and removal, so please, don't.

Direct responses to this advisory in this thread will be considered off topic and will be subject to warning and removal. Comments are welcome here:

##ATTENTION ALL 9/11 POSTERS- FORUM REJUVENATION##

It is strongly recommended that members acquaint themselves with the forum rules before posting, because ignorance of them will not stand as an excuse for misconduct.

DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS ADVISORY. STAY ON TOPIC.

reply to post by turbofan

Watch the top left corner of the video at 0:49 and look for the arcing debris, shooting up and out in an arcing fashion.

Actually this is the video which should have been referenced in the OP, and it is the South Tower. At 038, cutter charges can be seen going off in the lower left side of the tower, then the facing side, and then the upper right.

In slow motion, it appears to be pulverized concrete ejected outwards. But the top 30 story block of floors is tilting, not yet falling. It has not dropped down yet to pulverize the floors below it. Explosives are ejecting that debris and pulverized concrete.

Google Video Link

Watching this video at the normal speed can be misleading, as the first ring of "material" appears to be smoke gushing out of the impact floors after the upper mass begins to fall. However, when slowed down, we will observe that this is not smoke at all, but rather pulverized concrete being ejected outward before the upper mass began to move.

NIST have asserted that it was the kinetic energy released from the falling upper mass which contributed to the failure of the lower floors, however, kinetic energy is only present in a moving object, and thus if the upper mass has yet to move, then there is no kinetic energy.

So, what is the most likely source of the pulverized concrete being ejected horizontally from the towers? Yup, you got it - high speed explosives!

source

And in this video at the 6 second mark, a piece of debris is ejected at high velocity, BEFORE the tower starts to fall. Stop the video at 6 seconds and get a look at it. It seems to be a chunk of concrete in the act of pulverizing.



And in the next video, we have David Chandler, yes the very same high school physics teacher who FORCED the NIST pseudo-scientists to correct their stupid 'error' or 'deliberate distortion' and admit a 2.25 second period of freefall for WTC7.

Chandler explains the ejections from the South Tower and the velocities they reach.



[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3abd8190fbe1.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by SPreston


Two questions -

Why do the "cutter charges" go off exactly at the point of the plane's impact?

Why does the collapse, with its "hurled concrete" looks so different to the CD of Building 7?

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by SPreston

 

Two questions -

Why do the "cutter charges" go off exactly at the point of the plane's impact?

Google Video Link

No, you are mistaken. The cutter charges do not go off exactly at Flight 175s point of impact. Flight 175 impacted at floor 81 on the south face, and the cutter charges that we can see are going off 5 floors and more below the point of impact on the south and east faces, and higher up on the northeastern corner.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/73f1b96bb1a4.jpg[/atsimg]

Firefighters reported seeing explosive flashes going around the towers and hearing explosions, so likely these cutter charges in the video did likewise.

Why does the collapse, with its "hurled concrete" looks so different to the CD of Building 7?

Because the Towers were top-down explosive demolitions and WTC7 was a more conventional bottom-up demolition, with the walls imploding towards the center. NIST claims approximately 8 floors were removed by phenomena (which is maybe a pseudo-scientist term for explosives) for the 2.25 second period of freefall.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/96adaf72aee9.jpg[/atsimg]

Hundreds of 4 ton exterior wall sections were hurled up to 600 feet away from both towers in all directions by the explosive demolitions, which pulverized the concrete floors and tower contents into fine powder.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/4b786c05ff6c.jpg[/atsimg]

NIST was forced to admit to a 2.25 second period of freefall for WTC7 by a high school physics teacher, which they refuse to explain.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3abd8190fbe1.jpg[/atsimg]

STOP POSTING THE SAME PICTURES OVER AND OVER

Whew...

Ok, Now let us take a look at this.

Terms and Conditions

1h.) Spamming: You will not post identical content, or snippets of identical content, to multiple threads in the discussion forums. You will also not create more than one thread for your topic, or create multiple "slightly different" threads for a single topic.

Now, that is fair warning and yes, warnings come next.

Thank you for your cooperation

Semper

Originally posted by SPreston

No, you are mistaken. The cutter charges do not go off exactly at Flight 175s point of impact. Flight 175 impacted at floor 81 on the south face, and the cutter charges that we can see are going off 5 floors and more below the point of impact on the south and east faces, and higher up on the northeastern corner.

Presumably the remains of the aeroplane caused damage to the floors around where it hit, including partial collapse. So the external visual evidence of the collapse starts slightly lower.

It's already been proved that it's impossible to pilot the planes with the accuracy required to hit an exact area on the tower so even getting within five floors of where you wanted to start the demo would have been highly unlikely.

The external visual evidence of collapse starts pretty much where the plane hit. The inside is probably already buckling and collapsing, so we see the expulsion from that process begin.

Because the Towers were top-down explosive demolitions and WTC7 was a more conventional bottom-up demolition, with the walls imploding towards the center.

Why would you use different demolition styles?

What are the "squibs" in the towers doing if only thermite is being used to destroy the building?