Originally posted by ImAPepper
There was reports of molten metal. It was not analyzed at anytime to see if it were steel or not.
Originally posted by SirPatrickHenry
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Originally posted by SirPatrickHenry
3rd, being a demo guy, If this was the result of Jet Fuel and Damage, why is there evidence of molten steel in the dust from the WTC ?
1st of all. It was a combination of Fire, Damage, and dislodged fireproofing. Jet fuel acted as an accelerant.
There was reports of molten metal. It was not analyzed at anytime to see if it were steel or not. There was not any molten steel found in the dust. That sounds like Space Chimp- Judy Woods and her "dustification" crap.
Your right, My apologies, there was not evidence of molten steel, but rather Molten Iron and Lead, and vaporized Lead.
J Lee group who were hired by lawyers for Deutsche Bank to do tests on the Dust for environmental/cleanup reasons. "Various metals (most notably iron and lead) were melted during the WTC Event, producing spherical metallic particles. Exposure of phases to high heat results in the formation of spherical particles due to surface tension. Figure 21 and Figure 22 show a spherical iron particle resulting from the melting of iron (or steel)." page 21/34 "In addition to the spherical iron and aluminosilicate particles, a variety of heavy metal particles including lead, cadmium, vanadium, yttrium, arsenic, bismuth, and barium particles were produced by the pulverizing, melting and/or combustion of the host materials such as solder, computer screens, and paint during the WTC Event. Combustion-related products are significant WTC Dust Markers, particularly if seen in combination. However, it is worth noting that fly ash and partially combusted products can occur in trace concentrations in ordinary building dusts, but not in the concentrations observed in WTC Dust." page 23/34 "Many of the materials, such as lead, cadmium, mercury and various organic compounds, vaporized and then condensed during the WTC Event." page 25/34 "The presence of lead oxides on the surface of mineral wool indicates the exposure of high temperatures at which lead would have undergone vaporization, oxidation, and condensation on the surface of mineral wool." page 25/34
RJ Lee Group
For lead to be vaporized the temperatures would have been over 1750 Celsius
www.engineeringtoolbox.com...
1750 Celsius =3182 Fahrenheit
www.mathsisfun.com...
Iron melts at around 1535 deg Celsius
But, tell chimp lady to start singing!
Originally posted by turbofan
One of my fav photos:
Originally posted by SirPatrickHenry
reply to post by hooper
Hooper, I'm really getting tired of doing your reading for you.
How does one get molten steel ? IN THE DUST OF THE WTC ? Yes it was in the Dust read the RJ Lee group Report.
You guys are now in denial to the tenth degree. Remind me of little children who stick there hands in over there ears and go la la la la la la la la la la.
Figure 21 and Figure 22 show a spherical iron particle resulting from the melting of iron (or steel)."
Guess the RJ Lee Group is a bunch of space chimps, I can sound this out for you guy's.
[edit on 17-11-2009 by SirPatrickHenry]
[edit on 17-11-2009 by SirPatrickHenry]
Originally posted by SirPatrickHenry
reply to post by ImAPepper
Please get a better video.
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by SirPatrickHenry
reply to post by hooper
Hooper, I'm really getting tired of doing your reading for you.
How does one get molten steel ? IN THE DUST OF THE WTC ? Yes it was in the Dust read the RJ Lee group Report.
You guys are now in denial to the tenth degree. Remind me of little children who stick there hands in over there ears and go la la la la la la la la la la.
Figure 21 and Figure 22 show a spherical iron particle resulting from the melting of iron (or steel)."
Guess the RJ Lee Group is a bunch of space chimps, I can sound this out for you guy's.
[edit on 17-11-2009 by SirPatrickHenry]
[edit on 17-11-2009 by SirPatrickHenry]
Yes in the dust. Big f***** deal! It proves that metal was exposed to heat. Not exactly earth shattering news unless you add about ten layers of unfounded conspiracy nonsense.
Metal was exposed to heat and I guess the only source of heat was super nano-thermite, huh? Really, think these things through a little bit.
Originally posted by ImAPepper
Originally posted by SirPatrickHenry
reply to post by ImAPepper
Please get a better video.
Evasion noted, Thank you!
Now, can enyone else point out where the explosions are in the South Tower collpase?
Thank you.
