reply to post by HankMcCoy
If we analyse the differences between any generalised belief in god and generalised belief in aliens, then there are vast differences.
Firstly belief in any god implies belief in a creator, but not all beliefs in ET will have beliefs of creation.
Now, aliens are in a sense going to be just another evolved creature much like ourselves, and the rest of life on planet earth. Hence, we would be an
alien to them, as much are they are alien to us.
Extraterrestrial means "from another body (planet, moon etc) in the galaxy or universe etc, i.e. not originally from or born on earth".
Although if humans migrate to mars and have offspring, then they are technically a martian?
There's scientific evidence backing the assertion that life probably exists elsewhere as well. There's zero scientific evidence of a creator.
I think it's a fair to say that aliens are just what we can call people like ourselves. The definition of people may have to be expanded, but I'm
sure they have hobbies, likes, dislikes etc just like ourselves. I wouldn't worship these "people" anymore than I worship people on earth.
If we go a step further and state we think they are visiting, then that requires some form of faith, until we have sufficient evidence for proof of
visitation such as some form of physical evidence. But do these believers also worship them like an invisible god? Do the majority have their
ufology idols, or actually does the majority of those claiming to witness a UFO just feel curious and a bit more open-minded than they previously
were?
[edit on 15-11-2009 by john124]