the anti cancer diet and probable cure for cancer and other illnesses: the EVIDENCE for you, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 10-12-2009 @ 05:31 AM by rapunzel222
Originally posted by calstorm
reply to
post by rapunzel222





5. Eat your soy


Uh, no thank you I'll pass on the ovarian and thyroid cancer thank you very much.

You forgot chia seeds.

[edit on 15-11-2009 by calstorm]


oh god. they've convinced you... they're convincing everyone that soy is bad.

why might that be? cuz its good for you.

it occupies the oestrogen receptors and acts like tamoxifen only safe.

chinese ate it for MILLENIA. they NEVER got cancer until they started to adopt a western diet.

USE YOUR FRIGGING COMMON SENSE PEOPLE> SOY IS A VEGETABLE IT WONT GIVE YOU CANCER.

THINK.

for goddsakes, instead of believing everything these bastards tell you.


reply posted on 10-12-2009 @ 05:35 AM by rapunzel222
reply to post by mr-lizard



AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHh

if i hear one more person bag soy i will flip.

im sorry, but you're all IDIOTS.

there's no other way to put it.

you are sheep, you're all gonna die.

i give up.



reply posted on 10-12-2009 @ 05:39 AM by rapunzel222
Originally posted by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest
Originally posted by rapunzel222
reply to
post by DevolutionEvolvd



i suppose you think i might be reading your posts.

i dont read em, just to let you know, so really, its a waste of time posting em, if you're talking to me.



congratulations.

you are now officially completely close-minded in my opinion.

how the HELL are people supposed to f-ing learn if you cover your ears and yell "LALALALALALALALALALALA" when people disagree with you?
i dont know anything on this topic. "Dev" seems to be making valid points. the fact that youre refusing to address him/her makes me more likely to side with them and think they are right.

the problem here i think is, "Dev" is saying things you disagree with and cant argue with, if you could refute the things he/she says, you would. you would be trying to show people your evidence is valid and not try to silence and completely blow off those with different opinions.



[edit on 15-11-2009 by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest]


who you side with is your business.

who i listen to is mine.

and i dont waste my time listening to people who are wrong. becuz what would be the point?

no i wouldn't bother. im not really here to enter into long drawn out arguments with people when i think they are wrong. so that you will be convinced i am right.

it isnt my job to convince you; i am not a nursemaid.

i am here posting info that you are free to look at and draw your own conclusions about.

if you choose to believe dev and not me, its your lookout.

im here to help;

but i cant convince everybody.


reply posted on 12-12-2009 @ 05:18 PM by rapunzel222
reply to post by rapunzel222



well i dont disagree with you for removing my post, (well actually i do disagree with you - it appears im not allowed to retailiate at all, but people are allowed to swear at me, and say i am full of hate and have brain cancer and side with the other person who swore at me, and im the one who gets their post removed)
but what about removing the post of the person who called me an arsehole for no reason other than that i posted some scientific information backed up by lots of studies?

the monitoring on this site seems a little biased. i have to say that i think calling me an 'arsehole' is 'exceedingly displeasurable behaviour'.

would you mind explaining why you didnt remove their post?

the only reason i responded in that manner was because the poster said i was full of hate and made a pretty tasteless joke about me having brain cancer instead of breast cancer, which i think is an extremely rude and unfounded thing to say. were they disciplined? i've been attacked badly for posting this thread on your forum, by a lot of members who have been rude.

and you discipline me, but not hte person who swore at me. im disappointed iwht this site. i have only come on here to provide your membes with information, which i thought this forum was interested in; but no one seems to be very grateful for any of the info i provided.

maybe i will find a different forum.

[edit on 12-12-2009 by rapunzel222]

[edit on 12-12-2009 by rapunzel222]

[edit on 12-12-2009 by rapunzel222]


reply posted on 12-12-2009 @ 05:36 PM by rapunzel222



reply posted on 12-12-2009 @ 06:26 PM by mopusvindictus
reply to post by rapunzel222



Soy is great if your a guy and don't mind being made into a half a man as your method of life extension... i'm a longevity freak but wont use the stuff because my LIFE I LIVE matters to me...

And please...

Edit your post so as not to stretch out the whole page.... it's really annoying.

Perhaps that is what marking your territory is reduced to after eating allot of Soy? Allot of aaaaaaaaa's in a thread line?


reply posted on 13-12-2009 @ 05:55 PM by DevolutionEvolvd
reply to post by Animal



Remember our discussion regarding research? It's the field of nutrition science that is affected as much or more than any other field by bogus studies and poor interpretations. Epidemiology runs deep in this field.....but it doesn't pin point causality.

Of course diet affects health.

Claude Bernard:

Indeed, proof that a given condition always precedes or accompanies a phenomenon does not warrant concluding with certainty that a given condition is the immediate cause of that phenomenon. It must still be established that when this condition is removed, the phenomen will no longer appear….


-Dev

[edit on 13-12-2009 by DevolutionEvolvd]


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 03:30 AM by Doc Tesla
reply to post by wycky



no one is denying that diet and disease are correlated, i am just denying her "proof". meat doesn't lead to cancer.

here hippies and vegans follow my logic.

we have canine teeth correct? that means God or Evolution (pick your poison) wants us to eat meat.

people who ate alot of meat would have died in larger numbers then vegans and slowly meat eater would have all disappeared.

or the god theory, he gave us them so we can eat meat.


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:35 PM by Quickfix
reply to post by Rawhemp



Yup, thats why i don't see the doctors to often. I have no need, I know exactly what to do when i come accross a major disease or illness.

Increase your vitamin C intake and change your diet. Its simple and i know people that have done this and have completely cured themselves of cancer and diabetes. It also has to do with your thinking, you have to be positive and know your guna beat it.

Be safe and think for yourselves!!



[edit on 14-12-2009 by Quickfix]


reply posted on 14-12-2009 @ 12:59 PM by DevolutionEvolvd
reply to post by watcher73



I must have missed the part where The Bible was considered a peer reviewed publication.

Originally posted by rapunzel222

USE YOUR FRIGGING COMMON SENSE PEOPLE> SOY IS A VEGETABLE IT WONT GIVE YOU CANCER.



There have been negative AND positive associations with meat consumption and cancer, which suggests that meat is NOT causing it. And, actually, vegetable oil consumption has demonstrated an associative risk for cancer.

You should really learn to understand study designs and the difference between correlations and causations.

-Dev
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



First Heartless Man - You Don\'t Really Need A Heart or A Pulse
  Posted 9 days ago with 51 member flags
Doctor Uses Coconut Oil to Reverse Husband\'s Alzheimer\'s Disease
  Posted 15 days ago with 28 member flags
A brief look at water fluoridation and the insanity of it
  Posted 12 days ago with 28 member flags
Brains of Addicts Are Inherently Abnormal
  Posted 9 days ago with 20 member flags
FDA say body is a drug and has the right to regulate it!
  Posted 12 days ago with 18 member flags
I\'m 24 and I feel Doomed- A rare Case - 28 reported Worldwide
  Posted 0 days ago with 16 member flags