It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
LOL... Dude.. Don't make me laugh. Something not having evidence does not mean it's false. It simply means there's no indication to confirm that it's true. What you're saying is exactly like me saying that you have no ears, because I currently have no evidence that you do.. So logically, it can be true or false when there's no evidence.
Originally posted by quackers
If a person makes contrary scientific claim (to an "accepted" hypothesis), without any scientific basis, or even having a background in sciences, and without any scientific proof, then their claim is false. That is not ad-hominem, it is pointing out the obvious. The ad-hominem comes when someone finds objection to this obvious flaw and attacks another for exposing the flaw.
Sure, we might evolve now as humans, but there's no evidence that a developed species (as in, not bacterial or anything of the like) evolves naturally into another developed species. This, without species A being able to reproduce with B, and while B ARE being able to reproduce with its own species..
Yes, they are, but the cells are designed by us to do that =) It's simple genetic engineering. The problem is, creating DNA AND maintaining it in the first place, not just altering it, and after that, allow that DNA in itself to change and create something else.. Seems pretty much impossible..
Originally posted by etherical waterwave
I've been watching discovery7 yesterday and there was a program where they created cells and using a 'printer', they printed cells into organs like livers and such. they maybe cannot create hairs, but they do create organs.
other features on the show were, growing amputated limbs back and such, I don't recall all anymore.
just mentioning they are very very..... VERY far in these things, I almost was astonished about what they are able to create nowaday.
Only to the victim i was speaking about it is a miracle. That lack of an ability to decide fantasy from reality isnt their fault. It was givin to them by their experiances of coincidence.
Just like having your limbs chopped off or being horribly disfigured in a car accident. Wrong place, wrong time... anyone could be religious.
The scientific evidence indicates that life did not and could not somehow arise spontaneously from some warm little pond, as Darwin thought
cells are far more complex and sophisticated than Darwin could have conceived of. How did mere chance produce this
His ideas about information inside the cell.
His failure to see the limits of variation of species
His discounting of the Cambrian Explosion.
His theory of homology
His theory of human beings evolving from apes.
His theory of the tree of life. (no one has ever observed speciation)
His rejection of biblical creation by God