Originally posted by Deran
Yeah, but they're not stating that something else is causing this, at all. They're only talking about the sun and how it warms the earth.
But it's an interesting idea that something else is affecting the solar system. Many unexplained anomalies point to something strange going on that
we just haven't managed to grasp yet.
There is a reason why I excerpted and put on bold this part.
Surprise In Earth's Upper Atmosphere: Mode Of Energy Transfer From The Solar Wind
"Its like something else is heating the atmosphere besides the sun. This discovery is like finding it got hotter when the sun went
down," said Larry Lyons, UCLA professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences and a co-author of the research, which is in press in two
companion papers in the Journal of Geophysical Research.
Notice they say something else BESIDES THE SUN is heating the atmosphere, the fluctuations of the interplanetary field is not what causes this
heating, the fluctuations, and more so towards a weakening of the interplanetary magnetic field is allowing more energy from another source entering
the Solar System. This other source is so powerful, or so massive that it is even affecting the distance between the Sun and the planets, and this
distance is increasing. I posted a link to other research that shows there is no way they can account for this secular increase in the AU of the
distance between the Sun, and the planets in the Solar System.
Secular increase of the astronomical unit and perihelion precessions as tests of the Dvali–Gabadadze–Porrati multi-dimensional braneworld
Lorenzo Iorio JCAP09(2005)006 doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/09/006
Viale Unità di Italia 68, 70125, Bari, Italy
Abstract. An unexpected secular increase of the astronomical unit, the length scale of the Solar System, has recently been reported by
three different research groups (Krasinsky and Brumberg, Pitjeva, Standish). The latest JPL measurements amount to 7 ± 2 m cy−1. At
present, there are no explanations able to accommodate such an observed phenomenon, either in the realm of classical physics or in the
usual four-dimensional framework of the Einsteinian general relativity. The Dvali–Gabadadze–Porrati braneworld scenario, which
is a multi-dimensional model of gravity aimed at providing an explanation of the observed cosmic acceleration without dark energy, predicts, among
other things, a perihelion secular shift, due to Lue and Starkman, of 5 × 10−4 arcsec cy−1 for all the planets of the Solar System. It
yields a variation of about 6 m cy−1 for the Earth–Sun distance which is compatible with the observed rate of change for the astronomical unit.
The recently measured corrections to the secular motions of the perihelia of the inner planets of the Solar System are in agreement with the predicted
value of the Lue–Starkman effect for Mercury, Mars and, at a slightly worse level, the Earth.
This same source is affecting every planet in the Solar System in several ways which can't be explained. Comets are arriving earlier than they are
supposed to, just like the pioneer anomalies found something stopping them, but in the case of comets, which have other orbits different form the
pioneer satellites, they are arriving earlier because this source is pushing them faster towards the inner Solar System.
What happens when the interplanetary field weakens? more energy, dust, and other charged particles are able to enter the Solar System.
I even posted evidence from NASA and ESA, which I have posted before, and they include the fact that the entire Solar System is entering a new region
of space where there is more dust, and charged particles, and because the interplanetary magnetic field is fluctuating as it weakens, because of the
weakening of the Sun's activity, more interstellar dust, and charged particles are flowing into the Solar System, but they also state that this
increase is exponential, and by 2012 it will be 10 times higher than it was in 2003.
Strange coincidence that this is happening until 2012, along some other things.
We even have had Michu Kaku warns us that by 2012 the Sun will probably increase in activity to a level that will affect ground communications, and
our electrical infraestructure.
Because the Earth's magnetic field is also weakened, and because there have been, and are breaches in our magnetic field any changes in the Sun, or
the dynamics of the Solar System will have more drastic impact on Earth, it's climate, as well as other geophysical phenomenon, such as earthquakes,
magmatic activity, etc.
Anyway, whatever has been affecting every planet in the Solar System, seems to also be what has caused the weakening of the Sun's activity. It is
too much of a coincidence for all of this happening at the same time.
Also do note the research that I posted from 1978, in which they stated the Solar System was heading towards a nearby interstellar cloud, and this
would affect a drastic effect on the earth, INCLUDING it's climate.
Is the solar system entering a nearby interstellar cloud
Vidal-Madjar, A.; Laurent, C.; Bruston, P.; Audouze, J.
AA(CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique Stellaire et Planetaire, Verrieres-le-Buisson, Essonne, France), AB(CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique Stellaire et
Planetaire, Verrieres-le-Buisson, Essonne, France), AC(CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique Stellaire et Planetaire, Verrieres-le-Buisson, Essonne, France),
AD(Meudon Observatoire, Hauts-de-Seine; Paris XI, Universite, Orsay, Essonne, France)
Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 223, July 15, 1978, p. 589-600. (ApJ Homepage)
Observational arguments in favor of such a cloud are presented, and implications of the presence of a nearby cloud are discussed, including
possible changes in terrestrial climate. It is suggested that the postulated interstellar cloud should encounter the solar system at some
unspecified time in the near future and might have a drastic influence on terrestrial climate in the next 10,000 years.
Because of the weakening of the Sun, this allowed even more interstellar dust, and charged particles, as well as other forms of radiation to enter the
ESA sees stardust storms heading for Solar System
Date Released: Monday, August 18, 2003
Source: Artemis Society
Until ten years ago, most astronomers did not believe stardust could enter our Solar System. Then ESA's Ulysses spaceprobe discovered minute
stardust particles leaking through the Sun's magnetic shield, into the realm of Earth and the other planets. Now, the same spaceprobe has
shown that a flood of dusty particles is heading our way.
What is surprising in this new Ulysses discovery is that the amount of stardust has continued to increase even after the solar activity calmed down
and the magnetic field resumed its ordered shape in 2001.
Scientists believe that this is due to the way in which the polarity changed during solar maximum. Instead of reversing completely, flipping north to
south, the Sun's magnetic poles have only rotated at halfway and are now more or less lying sideways along the Sun's equator. This weaker
configuration of the magnetic shield is letting in two to three times more stardust than at the end of the 1990s. Moreover, this influx could
increase by as much as ten times until the end of the current solar cycle in 2012.
Back when I reported this around 2004 in the forums, i stated that if more interstellar dust was entering the Solar System, then it was only logical
to know that more charged particles, plasma, gases, etc would be entering the Solar System, but some members claimed there was no evidence for this
even though it was a logical conclusion.
Even the Earth's magnetic field has been weakening since 1840, and it has been fluctuating towards a weakening state in a way that hasn't occurred
in tens of thousands of years.
Magnetic Field Weakening in Stages, Old Ships' Logs Suggest
for National Geographic News
May 11, 2006
Earth's magnetic field is weakening in staggered steps, a new analysis of centuries-old ships logs suggests.
The finding could help scientists better understand the way Earth's magnetic poles reverse.
The planet's magnetic field flips—north becomes south and vice versa—on average every 300,000 years. However, the actual time between reversals
The field last flipped about 800,000 years ago, according to the geologic record.
Since 1840, when accurate measures of the intensity were first made, the field strength has declined by about 5 percent per
This is most probably the cause for Climate Change which the Earth has been experiencing since the 1860s.
Anyway, i think i made my point, and thus i won't post every link I posted in other threads, I already linked to those threads that have more
[edit on 14-11-2009 by ElectricUniverse]