ACTA -- A Patriot Act For the Internet
James Love, Director, Knowledge Ecology International
This week 40 or so countries are meeting in South Korea to consider text for a new international agreement on the enforcement of intellectual property
rights. It is called the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). The term "counterfeiting" is designed to demonize the agreement critics as
friends of organized crime, much like the name of the Patriot Act seemed better than the "Elimination of Civil Liberties Act." It is really an
agreement that addresses a wide range of intellectual property enforcement issues -- involving patents, copyrights, trademarks and other IPR. (Details
here)
keionline.org...
If you are a lowly member of the public, the text is secret. The names of persons who attend the meetings are secret. The titles of the documents are
secret. If you represent a big firm or law firm -- pretty much any big firm it seems, the U.S. government will show you documents after you sign a
non-disclosure agreement - curbing your right to speak out on the contents of the documents you see.
Some details of the negotiation have leaked out, most recently from a memo by Euopean Union describing the Obama Administration proposal for a new
global system of Internet controls and liabilities. Michael Geist, Gwen Hienz of EFF, and a few journalists -- most living outside of the U.S., have
written about ACTA.
The entire U.S. tech sector has been publicly silent, as the Obama administration has co-oped them into trading silence for access to the secret
documents.
At this point, Congress needs to stand up and put an end to this appalling spectacle of secret legislation on a global scale. How can politicians
claim to be all for transparency, and allow this indefensible violation of the public right to know proceed?
A large number of organizations and people have written President Obama asking that he end the secrecy of the negotiation. It is doubtful this will
happen unless newspapers write about the issue (aren't they big advocates of the right to know?), members of Congress weigh in, or if the critics of
the secret negotiation can mobilize public opinion.
There is a lot at stake. Civil rights, privacy, rules for injunctions and damages against businesses and individuals, chilling of speech, the first
sale doctrine, the global movement of medicines and other commodities, etc, will all be impacted by this ridiculously secret negotiation.
Earth to politicians -- you work for us, not the International Chamber of Commerce. Make this negotiation public!
James Love, Director, Knowledge Ecology International
Just like the Patriot Act, this is designed to look like they are protecting copy rights, when in fact they are trying to
A. Spy on everyone
B. Limit access
C. Invade privacy
D. Infringe on free speech
E. Control the single most important avenue for information gathering humanity has ever seen.
The internet has an abundance of crap on it, but it also is the last source of clear, unfiltered, unregulated truth that can be found in today's
world. It allows people of like minds to come together. It allows the masses of sheeple to wake up to some issue that main stream media refuses to
report on. Soon the "powers that be" are going to have to get their grip around it, or it will bring them all down. This is the first shot they are
firing in the "War on the Free Internet". There are things you can do about it, and ironically, the internet is where you can currently go to find
out what. So go now, gather, share, chat, and sign petitions!!! Engage in free speech. PROTECT OUR INTERNET! Fight for it, or it WILL go bye-bye.