It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Are you one of the Types that supports forced sterilization and other rimes against humanity ?
Does it bother you that people compare your strange beliefs with the German sterilizations policies during the 1930s? You mad about that bro?
Originally posted by Mr. D
Of all the questions to ask Are you going to ask next time if you can go take a shower,
eat, drink or go to the toilet? COME ON!!!!!!!! Is it a right to survive? Survival does not ask
can I, please may I survive. There is no such thing as political correctness or a Geneva
convention when it comes down to survival! Obviously, you have never had to go through
that scenerio so I really shouldn't get upset. I don't know if you are asking because you don't
know, are trolling responses for TPTB to gauge responses as feed back for their social
engineering programs or just plain ignorant. Having someone else determine whether you
are allowed to reproduce or how many times is equal to genocide. Those very people who
call mankind useless eaters are the ones who like to hear questions like these and they
love to hear the responses even more so to fine tune their social experiments. Next thing
they are going to do is implement a sex tax right along with the imbeded camera they have
in your bedrooms. It's questions like these that embolden them even more.
Originally posted by queenofsheba
reply to post by Death_Kron
The vast majority of welfare monies aren't sucked up by women with children. The biggest chunk of the welfare dollars are spent on LTC (long-term care) for those in nursing homes, assisted living facilities; we take care of our elderly here in America. Grandma and Grandpa are not typically out on the street.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
So, yes, it is a right to reproduce. But it's also a right for nature to extinguish that life if the food, water, land, security and so on is not able to be supplied to support that life.
Originally posted by lifeform11
reply to post by pikypiky
so what if you have all the things you need to raise a child, a lovely house, excellent job etc etc, and your 6 months into parenthood, when the boss phones to inform you, you have lost your job?
then what? you are a great parent but now you are out of work, does somebody turn up at that instant and snatch the baby from the mother? are the parents then rushed to a hospital to be sterilized?
Originally posted by lifeform11
i do not think reproduction is a right that is given to somebody, we are all born with the parts to reproduce therefore it is a universal right everybody is born with, its not something anybody else should decide but the person who's life it is.
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
So think of guided reproduction as another necessary for a healthy society.
Think of jailing those who advocate forced sterilization as a necessity for a healthy society. Or maybe make them see a doctor about their problem via court order.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
So think of guided reproduction as another necessary for a healthy society.
Think of jailing those who advocate forced sterilization as a necessity for a healthy society.
Or maybe make them see a doctor about their problem via court order.
Originally posted by Maslo
They stem from society recognising them and granting them to you. It is not ideal, but this is reality and it is the best we have.
Originally posted by Maslo
Because this one violates the right of another person, the future child. Thus it should be illegal, like plenty of other selfish acts involving two people are, for example stealing, abuse etc.
Originally posted by Maslo
All I am saying is that mentally stable people can have babies, mentally unstable should not. Whether the reason is genetic or something other is irrelevant to me.
Originally posted by Maslo
You just said it - correct and incorrect ways to raise a child are determined by parents and the law of the land. I propose to include my ideas in the law of the land.
Originally posted by Maslo
Right to personal liberty, property, safety and right to grow up in good conditions (!). There may be more, but this is from the top of my head.
Right to procreate? I do not recognize such a right. Why should there be such a right?
Originally posted by Maslo
Just use a combination of education, fines, tax cuts and increases, mandatory birth control pills etc. There are plenty of options besides sterilization.
Tell me then, what makes you disagree with the fact that reproduction is a right, as defined by the current consensus in modern society ? You say that rights come from society recognising and giving them to you, yet no modern society has ever seriously, officially restricted the right of their citizens to breed. With the above in mind, how come you disagree with the societal definition of ''rights'' on this particular issue ?
This is nonsensical. The child doesn't come into being until it's born. How can you violate the rights of someone that doesn't exist ? The rights of that child can only be violated after it's born; ergo, conceiving the child cannot have impact on a non-existent person.
Define ''mentally stable''. Would you include people that suffer from depression, OCD, personality disorders, ADHD etc. as ''mentally unstable'' ? I would say that the majority of people have some recurring mental thought processes, that are currently described by society as ''mental illness''. And how can you actually test whether someone is mentally stable or not ?
But as far as I can see, your ideals on what qualities people should have to procreate, are intangible concepts that would be impractical and impossible to enforce by law.
Right to spread your genetic material, and take part in the fundamental essence of life ? Ie. Reproducing and furthering existence.
That is completely different to sterilisation. What you are suggesting, is a way of discouraging the poor from having children, which is a very materialistic way to look at things.
Birth rates are declining in the West, and the population getting older, so any measures to discourage people having children will have an overall negative impact on the demographics of society ( in terms of age ), and the future workforce.
I guess we'll have to encourage more of those Romanian immigrants to set up camps in our countries.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Does it bother you that people compare your strange beliefs with the German sterilizations policies during the 1930s? You mad about that bro?