It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

THE TOP TEN LAME EXCUSES BY BIG PHARMA FOR VACCINE INADEQUACY

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 11 2009 @ 09:58 AM
link   
I recommend all of you (disinfo agents excluded, hee hee) GO CHECK OUT THIS MANS FRIGGEN YOUTUBE PAGE. His name is the Anti Terrorist and he is quite intelligent, hes been mentioned before here... alas good resources are quickly disappearing from this web site. That said, have a fun little list he made.


AND NOW, Our Favourite Part of Tonight's Programme...
the Top Ten Lame Excuses by Big Pharma justifying the release of an inadequate product as Stated in their own internal documents :

Number 10:

"Antibody to one antigenic variant of influenza virus might not protect against a new antigenic variant of the same type or subtype."

AKA this virus may morph, rendering the shot useless.

Number 9:

"It is not known whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine, FLUVIRIN, Novartis, Afluria, Fluarix or Medimmune can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity."

AKA we haven't tested this on pregnant women, but we will recommend they get the shot first. (There are reports of the shot triggering miscarriage)

Number 8:

"Safety and effectiveness in pediatric subjects below the age of 4 years have not been established."

AKA we haven't TESTED THIS SHOT ON PEOPLE UNDER 4, but we will recommend they get the shots first.

Number 7:

"It is not known whether FLUVIRIN or Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine is excreted in human milk."

AKA your little one could be drinking some toxic adjuvants.

Number 6:

"Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to vaccine exposure."

AKA we have not tested, and will not be testing these substances to establish a link between the vaccines and disorders they cause.

Number 5:

"Influenza-like illness" repeatedly listed as a "side effect"

AKA don't be surprised if the shot gives you the flu.

Number 4:

"No controlled trials demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with FLUARIX have been performed."

AKA we have no idea if this even works.

Number 3:

"Neither Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine, FLUVIRIN, Novartis, Afluria, Fluarix or Medimmune have been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility."

AKA we haven't tested these substances to discover negative impact on the body (don't expect those tests to ever occur)

Number 2:

"Immune mechanisms conferring protection against influenza following receipt of FluMist vaccine are not fully understood."

AKA WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW THIS PRODUCT WORKS . (Flumist is simply a bottled cough containing a food source and strains of H1N1 virus)

and the Number 1 Lame Excuse:

"Vaccination with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine, Novartis, Afluria, Fluarix or Medimmune may not protect all individuals."

AKA if this product does nothing beneficial at all, don't be surprised.

Well, ain't that about a bit*h?

[edit on 11-11-2009 by illusionincarnate]

[edit on 11-11-2009 by illusionincarnate]




posted on Nov, 11 2009 @ 11:09 AM
link   
reply to post by illusionincarnate
 


Any chance Anti Terrorist put a link to show where he got these admissions of negligence?

This is actually pretty hilarious. How can people think theyve had enough time to test these vaccines if they only discovered swine flu in april? I'd never put anything into my bloodstream thats only existed for 6 months. Is swine flu all over TV or something?

I'd like to see a study on TV watching and swine flu vaccination rates. I dont own a TV so the only news I get is from ATS, CNN.com, BBC.com, etc. I'm not exactly bombarded with fear mongering.

Once again, great list but does he post a reference or anything?



posted on Nov, 11 2009 @ 11:14 AM
link   
One of my favorites is what they don't say when directly asked.

When asked if it's safe, they reply that it is made the same was as the regular vaccine. It's not an answer.



posted on Nov, 11 2009 @ 11:23 AM
link   
AT released his source documents via a torrent you can find on his website. They are all released by the drug manufacturers themselves.

[edit on 11-11-2009 by illusionincarnate]



posted on Nov, 11 2009 @ 12:38 PM
link   
LOL, that has made me chuckle.

I was offered the vaccine jab at work ( I said no ) My manager and also some of my colleagues said, oh it's safe it is just like the seasonal flu vaccine, My reply was, oh really, I know it's manufactured like the seasonal flue vaccine but swine flu is not seasonal flu. I then said time to wake up sheeple. They all looked at me bemused. I walked off with a chuckle.




top topics
 
6

log in

join