FoxNews caught red-handed FAKING news footage, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 49 times


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 12:27 PM by sos37
Originally posted by Uniceft17
reply to
post by sos37



That's your only defense? Couldn't you have done better?

Fox News was George Bushs bestfriend and defended his every action, That's enough to make me question there credibility.

And why do you keep saying the same thing, I think we heard you the first time.

[edit on 11/11/2009 by Uniceft17]


Because some of us (like me) actually believe that GW Bush isn't the evil fascist that the left would have you believe. There are a lot of things he did that I didn't agree with, like trying to leave some our ports in the control of the United Arab Emmirates and not entering into environmental talks early on in his presidency.

I think Bush knew a lot more about what was going on in the world than anyone gives him credit. His big fault was that he allowed his decisions to be influenced by the wrong people and he made some bad choices.

Don't forget that a Democratic majority in Congress approved going to war in Iraq with the very same intelligence reports that GW Bush had. A fact that many of you love to conveniently forget so you can heap your "we need a whipping boy" mentality on a single man instead of distributing blame where it belongs.

As for Fox News - they report news just fine. Some of their commentator shows are what I call into question, but no more than I question Rachel Maddow or Keith Olbermann. What's your excuse for those two wingnuts and the networks that employ them?

[edit on 11-11-2009 by sos37]


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 03:04 PM by really
Originally posted by Anjin
As far as Hannity? he screwed up by trying to claim something that wasn't and deserves to be called out for it but as far as mistakes go with news organizations, they all make them either intentionally or otherwise yet search ATS and Fox news is the one everyone goes after because lets face it, Liberals DO NOT like people with opinions other than their own.


Neither do conservatives and faux-conservatives. Unless you're watching most of these news stations for entertainment, you're wasting your time. I won't defend CNN or MSNBC but what I find truly amazing is how many people on ATS talk about these two news stations as the nefarious "MSM" but Fox as a reputable news source. PLEASE!!! I could care less if they (meaning Glenn Beck, Hannity or whomever) do stories on things you'll never see anywhere else. Let me tell you something, they know that many people are fed up. They know that many people do not trust the government. They know that many people believe in conspiracy theories. So, these business men and women (they are NOT journalists) simply research various conspiracy theories and then put them on the air so that you will watch and say, "See that! Fox is for real!!"
You think they are for real because they are agreeing with you and feeding your anger, hatred and fear (much of your anger, hatred and fear is justifiable). But, they aren't doing it because they care, they are doing it to make a buck off of you, get you to trust them and then slip bits and pieces of their agenda into their "newscasts".
Wake up!!!


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 03:21 PM by really
reply to post by Anjin



that's hilarious!!! the state sponsored broadcasting. Fox was the "state sponsored broadcasting" for Bush. They did the same thing that MSNBC does now. But, you agree with them so they are not state sponsored. I don't watch any of this crap very often unless I need a good laugh or as somebody else on this thread said, there's a pretty woman on.
I could care less if you're a liberal or a conservative, if you buy into any of these stations being better than the others you've fallen for it.


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 03:45 PM by TruthSeeker8300
reply to post by shrike071



John is nothing but a person with an agenda. How come none of you make a fuss when MSNBC talked about racism and showed a guy carrying a rifle at a protest and it was really a black man!? You're two faced hypocrites, that is why.


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 03:53 PM by really
reply to post by srslyguyz



Who called them credible news sources? Were you addressing me? Glen Beck? Yeah, I would love him if he just admitted that he is a comedian.


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 03:57 PM by srslyguyz
Originally posted by really
reply to
post by srslyguyz



Who called them credible news sources? Were you addressing me? Glen Beck? Yeah, I would love him if he just admitted that he is a comedian.


i was adressing any one who found those news sorces credible, if you do not then it was not directed at you. in my opinon main stream media in general can not be trusted. i will watch for headlines but i dont trust anything right off that i find on the news


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 04:12 PM by really
Originally posted by srslyguyz
Originally posted by really
reply to
post by srslyguyz



Who called them credible news sources? Were you addressing me? Glen Beck? Yeah, I would love him if he just admitted that he is a comedian.


i was adressing any one who found those news sorces credible, if you do not then it was not directed at you. in my opinon main stream media in general can not be trusted. i will watch for headlines but i dont trust anything right off that i find on the news


With that, I am in complete agreement.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^