Chris Matthews: Not a Crime To Call Al Qaeda, Is It?, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 11-11-2009 @ 09:02 AM by Alxandro

MSNBC's Chris Matthews has said some things that would make your scratch your head - like getting a thrill up his leg from a speech given by Barack Obama. However, this one will really make you wonder what he was thinking.

"See - we have a problem," Matthews said. "How do we know when someone like Hasan is going to make his move and do we know he's an Islamist until he's made his move? He makes a phone call or whatever, according to Reuters right now. Apparently he tried to contact al Qaeda. Is that the point at which you say, ‘This guy is dangerous?' That's not a crime to call up al Qaeda, is it? Is it? I mean, where do you stop the guy?"


NewsBuster Link

Wholie Geez.
I'm having a really difficult time trying to grasp what Matthews is actually thinking here by making a totally asinine comment as this.
Seems to me even Obama should pull him aside, slap him upside the head and say "YES, IT IS A CRIME, DUH!"

So I'm hoping someone from the left can help explain the logic behind this comment because I have no idea what point he is trying to make here.

Help me, please, explain this to me like I'm a four year old because I'm beginning to think "political correctness" should be a crime.

Watch the idiot here

additional link

Note: Apologize if this has already been posted, didn't find one in the search


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 09:08 AM by LiveForever8
reply to post by Alxandro





Seems to me even Obama should pull him aside, slap him upside the head and say "YES, IT IS A CRIME, DUH!"


It's not a crime though, is it? I certainly haven't heard about that law being passed.

However, I do think he is making a ridiculous point.

If somebody tries to contact al Qaeda, they should be carefully watched. It doesn't necessarily make them dangerous, but you must start questioning their motives.

A news anchor said this right?

Peace.

[edit on 05/08/2009 by LiveForever8]


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 09:59 AM by searching4truth
Granted his example could have or should have been better illustrated, but no it is not a crime in and of itself to call al queda, although it makes me wish I had a number to hear "Good morning thank you for calling al queda how can we help you" , especially since they seem to be so hard to track down. Let's not forget how many people that have been falsely accused of having ties to terrorists or being a terrorist, that simply haven't.

From what I have heard Hasan was being "observed" for a while prior to his attack. But that still leaves me scratching my head, just having worked I have seen employees being sent to see a psychiatrist or having to take time off to sort out their "personal" issues (often times at the behest of the company) perhaps I have been fortunate in my work life. I do not believe that a person "just snaps" without any warning. Apparently, he had been discussing his "issues" with his superiors for about 8 yrs. Eight years?! For eight years he had been expressing his concerns himself, now that is not even taking into account what the CIA uncovered during their supposed investigation. I may be wrong, but doesn't the military have the servicemen and women subject to physicals and mental evaluations (especially a psychologist). I think they really missed the ball. Don't get me wrong, I am not taking the blame from the criminal, he deserves whatever punishment they give him for his actions.

Now, what I don't understand (if anyone has heard) he went on this shooting spree because he didn't want to be redeployed (having issue with killing other Muslims). First question is, does a military psychologist fight in a typical situation of his job function? I mean unless the area where he was located was directly under attack, would he have required to shoot at anyone? I also do not understand why when a person goes "postal" over their own situation, why they feel the need to kill others instead of committing suicide. Not that I'm advocating suicide, but just because someone is unhappy with their situation how does that translate into let me go kill a bunch of other people randomly, who in all actuality have no effect on my situation.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^