posted on Nov, 11 2009 @ 06:01 PM
reply to post by Nicolas Flamel
Some things are a little difficult to react to. The OP thinks that the shuttle took photos of a secret aircraft or UFO. The photos supplied show
just a triangular black object. To me the object looks to be at a good distance and my POV is supported by the camera shooting "wide open."
Nicolas Flamel adds a photo of an alleged X-43A except this photo looks to me like a made-up photo and not of a real aircraft in flight.
draknoir2 offers a link to a photo that resembles the object in the OP. We don't know if the object in this photo is of a real aircraft or a
mock-up.
Internos then adds what looks like a prosaic explanation, complete with data, for what is seen in the OP.
I don't know. The object seen in the OP doesn't look like it should have come from the shuttle because in the photos it doesn't look like a small
object. If it was, it should have looked more blurry because the photo shows the earth as if the camera's focus was wide open to infinity. And the
object seems to exhibit the same focus as infinity which shouldn't be if it's small and nearby.
I'm surprised that the shuttle is always losing part of its body, insulation or whatever. Didn't a small piece of insulation result in a
tragedy?
If it was the " secret SR-91 Aurora" it wouldn't be a secret any longer since it's being seen and photographed something a real secret project
wouldn't dare attempt.
Common sense dictates that Internos' explanation is the one to accept. But the explanation bothers me.