Space Shuttle takes photos of secret aircraft or UFO, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 10:04 AM by PYak1234
reply to post by Nicolas Flamel



You can't even have a bit of humour with these guys. They take things so literally. I'm sure the guy meant, they ALWAYS try and confuse sightings by saying they are something else. He DID NOT MEAN this was anything to do with "SWAMP GAS".

Sorry for the capital letters, its just so they don't misconstrue what I'm trying to express.


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 10:30 AM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by internos


Good job, Internos...

...now do you have any information on that other story alluded to on that "Discover Magazine" cover -- Orgasms: What are they? Why do we have them?


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 06:01 PM by The Shrike
reply to post by Nicolas Flamel



Some things are a little difficult to react to. The OP thinks that the shuttle took photos of a secret aircraft or UFO. The photos supplied show just a triangular black object. To me the object looks to be at a good distance and my POV is supported by the camera shooting "wide open."

Nicolas Flamel adds a photo of an alleged X-43A except this photo looks to me like a made-up photo and not of a real aircraft in flight.

draknoir2 offers a link to a photo that resembles the object in the OP. We don't know if the object in this photo is of a real aircraft or a mock-up.

Internos then adds what looks like a prosaic explanation, complete with data, for what is seen in the OP.

I don't know. The object seen in the OP doesn't look like it should have come from the shuttle because in the photos it doesn't look like a small object. If it was, it should have looked more blurry because the photo shows the earth as if the camera's focus was wide open to infinity. And the object seems to exhibit the same focus as infinity which shouldn't be if it's small and nearby.

I'm surprised that the shuttle is always losing part of its body, insulation or whatever. Didn't a small piece of insulation result in a tragedy?

If it was the " secret SR-91 Aurora" it wouldn't be a secret any longer since it's being seen and photographed something a real secret project wouldn't dare attempt.

Common sense dictates that Internos' explanation is the one to accept. But the explanation bothers me.



reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 06:31 PM by Chadwickus
reply to post by The Shrike



This isn't the only piece of debris that has been photographed from the shuttle, you'll find a few more examples here.


reply posted on 19-12-2010 @ 07:05 PM by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by Chadwickus



I agree with your post.

Swamp Gas is a lot more convincing than this, hahahahaha.

Seriously though, I agree.


reply posted on 20-12-2010 @ 09:12 PM by this_is_who_we_are






reply posted on 20-12-2010 @ 09:19 PM by this_is_who_we_are
reply to post by Nicolas Flamel



Here are enlargements of your photos.




edit on 12/20/2010 by this_is_who_we_are because: photo

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 10 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 18 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 13 days ago with 31 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 2 days ago with 22 member flags
UFO above Wadden Sea
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags