Thank You to All You Who Have Served , page 8


Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 81 times


reply posted on 17-11-2009 @ 04:02 PM by December_Rain
Originally posted by semperfortis
reply to
post by December_Rain



Statute and Code Please?
Or is this made up? An answer please.

Link?
Statute?
Any Evidence at all?
I would suggest to you, get some evidence, some statutes, links, ANYTHING would be better than what you have posted, and come back and I will help clear it up for you some more.

As always, I am here to assist.

Semper


Torture and US Criminal Law
§ 2340A. Torture

(a) Offense.— Whoever outside the United States commits or attempts to commit torture shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and if death results to any person from conduct prohibited by this subsection, shall be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
(b) Jurisdiction.— There is jurisdiction over the activity prohibited in subsection (a) if—
(1) the alleged offender is a national of the United States; or
(2) the alleged offender is present in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or alleged offender.

§ 2241. Aggravated sexual abuse
(a) By Force or Threat.— Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in a Federal prison, or in any prison, institution, or facility in which persons are held in custody by direction of or pursuant to a contract or agreement with the head of any Federal department or agency, knowingly causes another person to engage in a sexual act—
(1) by using force against that other person; or
(2) by threatening or placing that other person in fear that any person will be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both.
(b) By Other Means.— Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in a Federal prison, or in any prison, institution, or facility in which persons are held in custody by direction of or pursuant to a contract or agreement with the head of any Federal department or agency, knowingly—
(1) renders another person unconscious and thereby engages in a sexual act with that other person; or
(2) administers to another person by force or threat of force, or without the knowledge or permission of that person, a drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance and thereby—
(A) substantially impairs the ability of that other person to appraise or control conduct; and
(B) engages in a sexual act with that other person;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for any term of years or life, or both.

§ 2242. Sexual abuse
Whoever, in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in a Federal prison, or in any prison, institution, or facility in which persons are held in custody by direction of or pursuant to a contract or agreement with the head of any Federal department or agency, knowingly—
(1) causes another person to engage in a sexual act by threatening or placing that other person in fear (other than by threatening or placing that other person in fear that any person will be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping); or
(2) engages in a sexual act with another person if that other person is—
(A) incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct; or
(B) physically incapable of declining participation in, or communicating unwillingness to engage in, that sexual act;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for any term of years or for life.

§ 2441. War crimes
(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

CHAPTER 51—HOMICIDE
# § 1111. Murder - Death and imprisonment for life

Source: www.law.cornell.edu...
=================================================

Again these are just few of the crimes I put there not even all. The thing that all received adequate punishment and your statement they dont have to be put in jail is absurd at best.

[edit on 17-11-2009 by December_Rain]


reply posted on 18-11-2009 @ 06:32 AM by semperfortis
reply to post by December_Rain



Well that is something..

Still just your opinion and not in anyway based in fact as obviously more informed minds than yours charged them with the appropriate statutes.

I could post the statute for the leash laws in Washington DC, doesn't mean they were guilty of it, but it is on the books..

What happened? Did you try and sign up and get rejected? Sounds that way and nothing to get all emotionally bound up over. The military can't take everyone.

Semper



reply posted on 18-11-2009 @ 03:31 PM by semperfortis
reply to post by December_Rain



Claiming that everything posted contrary to what you believe is a personal attack is an old and tired trick and indicative of a weak stance.

The simple fact is, those that have served, those in positions, and rightfully so, high than yours; have determined what the charges should correctly be.

You stating, out of an ignorance of the facts, that they are wrong; in no way validates your position.

You obviously have a hatred toward brave young men and women and want to see them brought down. That is a personal attack from you on them. As I stepped up and served, I feel it is my right to step up again, and defend them.

Regardless, the people in authority have spoken, they are much more educated in the facts than you are, in fact, anyone that has served would be. So my stance is clearly the correct one.

Hatred is never a solid base as it always has an underlying agenda.

Semper


reply posted on 19-11-2009 @ 04:38 AM by December_Rain
reply to post by semperfortis



Back to you, who is stating out of ignorance that these are not facts. Prove them...thru the law, any link?any source? no nothing? Talk is cheap yeh' right. Lol. carry on.


reply posted on 19-11-2009 @ 06:33 AM by semperfortis
reply to post by December_Rain



Now you want someone else to "prove the negative"???

Another very inexperienced trick.

The "FACTS" are that which has happened..

The "Untruths" and "Opinions" are that which you are posting.

See?

Simple.

Semper


reply posted on 19-11-2009 @ 06:58 AM by December_Rain
reply to post by semperfortis



Not as per the World view...they are facts, only for few delusional american army ppl they are opinions. US is bound by Geneva Conventions which it has ratified, is signatory too and have used as an excuse for it's illegal war on Iraq. The secret Govt. memos/documents uncovered from US Army and US Govt. itself proves these (torture, deaths, rapes) are facts posted by me here which you failed to prove are mere opinions:
- www.abovetopsecret.com...

You see these were sent out by US govt under Freedom of Information Act. are nowhere created by me but by US Govt officials itself. So it's not my opinions. To state these are just opinions you have to provide proof that these facts are not facts but just opinions.


reply posted on 20-11-2009 @ 03:44 AM by PC equals Newspeak
Originally posted by jerico65
So, Craftsman, "loss of other's people's freedom"?? I guess we were stepping on the rights of the Nazis to kill anyone that disagreed with them, huh? I never saw that in a "civil rights" sort of light.


The Nazis didn't killed anyon who disagreed with them. Do you really believe that load of nonsense? Anyway, us Europeans didn't need you to come and fight the Nazis. If you really wanted to fight someone, you should have fought the communists (which Patton came to realise unfortunately no earlier than 1945). They were the real threat to Europe, not the Nazis.

Anyway, it's not so much the issue of defeating the Nazis that Europeans care about (although I'm sure 60 years of Nazi dominance would have been far better than 60 years of US dominance), however the real issue is the way the US corrupted European society at every level. It bothers me a lot to see the US now doing the very same thing in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Originally posted by jerico65
And how can anyone remain so ignorant to think it's all just "neo-Imperialism"? Which I noticed you've used in three other threads.


I've lived under a regime that was shaped by the neo-imperialist policies of your country for my entire life. I know the dire consequences of 6 decades of American cultural and economical interference in Europe first hand.

Originally posted by jerico65
"OK, kids, the words of the day are "Neo-Imperialism".


If Neo-Imperialism sounds new to you (I admit its use is not common), you may have heard of terms such as
Neocolonialism , Americanization or Cultural Imperialism?


reply posted on 20-11-2009 @ 02:32 PM by jerico65
Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
The Nazis didn't killed anyon who disagreed with them. Do you really believe that load of nonsense? Anyway, us Europeans didn't need you to come and fight the Nazis. If you really wanted to fight someone, you should have fought the communists (which Patton came to realise unfortunately no earlier than 1945). They were the real threat to Europe, not the Nazis.


They didn't, huh? You have to be kidding me. Tell that to the Communists that were thrown into concentration camps. And that goes for anyone else that spoke out against them, even their own people.

"Nazis not a threat". Now that's something you don't hear every day. Someone tell me what the hell they are teaching in school these days??

Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
Anyway, it's not so much the issue of defeating the Nazis that Europeans care about (although I'm sure 60 years of Nazi dominance would have been far better than 60 years of US dominance),....


Ask someone in Holland, Belgium, France, Russia, etc, if they have the same opinion you have; that things would have been so much better with the Nazis in control.

Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
....however the real issue is the way the US corrupted European society at every level. It bothers me a lot to see the US now doing the very same thing in Afghanistan and Iraq.


We did? I think the "corruption" was a little bit of give and take.

Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
I've lived under a regime that was shaped by the neo-imperialist policies of your country for my entire life. I know the dire consequences of 6 decades of American cultural and economical interference in Europe first hand.


But according to you, things would have better had the Nazis taken over, right? I guess that means you're not a Jew, a Slav, or any of the other cultures and people that were considered "untermensch" by the Nazis.

Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
If Neo-Imperialism sounds new to you (I admit its use is not common), you may have heard of terms such as
Neocolonialism , Americanization or Cultural Imperialism?


Wow, Wikipedia.


reply posted on 20-11-2009 @ 04:44 PM by PC equals Newspeak
Originally posted by jerico65
They didn't, huh? You have to be kidding me. Tell that to the Communists that were thrown into concentration camps. And that goes for anyone else that spoke out against them, even their own people.


That's an exaggeration.

Originally posted by jerico65
"Nazis not a threat". Now that's something you don't hear every day. Someone tell me what the hell they are teaching in school these days??


I wouldn't know. High school is about 10 years ago for me

Originally posted by jerico65
Ask someone in Holland, Belgium, France, Russia, etc, if they have the same opinion you have; that things would have been so much better with the Nazis in control.


I actually live in Belgium and base my opinion partly on era sources and stories from people who lived back then.

Originally posted by jerico65
Originally posted by PC equals Newspeak
....however the real issue is the way the US corrupted European society at every level. It bothers me a lot to see the US now doing the very same thing in Afghanistan and Iraq.


We did? I think the "corruption" was a little bit of give and take.


Not quite.

Originally posted by jerico65
But according to you, things would have better had the Nazis taken over, right? I guess that means you're not a Jew, a Slav, or any of the other cultures and people that were considered "untermensch" by the Nazis.

The term "Untermensch" was a reference to marginal rapists, thieves and the rest of the bottom of the barrel. It was not a reference to any specific ethnicity, unlike commonly believed.
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags