THE CONCLUSION OF THE NASA LAWSUIT: Concerning the Kecksburg, PA UFO case of 1965, page 3

Then the following you said in your statement.

The acorn appearance of some descriptions – others describe a Hollywood-style winged
space plane – intrigued me because that, in fact, is what the Venus entry probe DOES sort
of look like.

But then I learned that the description only originated some years later, when
TV reporters and UFO buffs showed the witnesses photographs of the Venus probe – and
some responded, “Yeah, THAT’S what I saw…” Sure.

It was also on the military channel provided by Arbitrageur, where some artist drawings of different objects were showed to some witnesses, and look to all is said in that video.
Don’t forget it is a video of the military channel.

Originally posted by Arbitrageur
The other thing you may want to consider is these eyewitnesses stating the object looks like a Russian satellite:

YouTube Link

If it really looked like an acorn then why didn't they object and say: "no, it didn't look like any of those, it looked like an acorn"?

So in that military channel video they spoke of 5 options, meteorite, a soviet space probe, an SR71 engine, an experiment military airplane, or unlike as it may seems, an Alien spacecraft.

Look what Arbitrageur also said about possible remains of meteors here.

Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I'm suggesting that what we know about meteors does not suggest we should have necessarily found the meteor. I covered this in the main thread on Kecksburg so you may want to read that, and there's a lot of other good information about the case there.

But I'll repost a bit here about a meteor (asteroid) in 2008 we actually tracked coming in from outer space, and it has something in common with the Dec 9 1965 meteor...both experienced explosions at altitude, which is not uncommon at all for meteorites (Even Tunguska was apparently a much more massive explosion at altitude, though the exact composition of ice to rock ratio of the impactor has been debated).

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by Arbitrageur

www.nasa.gov...

Where's the crater? Most people would walk right past that object without giving it a second glance. They only found it because they had teams of people specifically searching for it. This is a very well documented story, I suggest reading it, you can learn a lot about impacts from it:

Meteorites Found in Africa From First Predicted Asteroid Hit

Remember in October 2008 when Asteroid 2008 TC3 hit the scene – literally? This was the first asteroid that was predicted –and predicted correctly — to impact the Earth. Luckily, it wasn't big enough to cause any problems, and its path was over a remote area in Africa.

It streaked into the skies over northern Sudan in the early morning of October 7, 2008, and then exploded at a high 37 km above the Nubian Desert, before the atmosphere could slow it down. It was believed that the asteroid likely had completely disintegrated into dust. But meteor astronomer Peter Jenniskens thought there might be a chance to recover some of the remains of this truck-sized asteroid. And he was right.

Fifteen fresh-looking meteorites with a total mass of 563 g were recovered by 45 students and staff of the University of Khartoum during a field campaign on December 5-8, 2008. A second search on December 25-30 with 72 participants raised the total to 47 meteorites and 3.95 kg. Masses range from 1.5 g to 283 g, spread for 29km along the approach path in a manner expected for debris from 2008 TC3

This was a truck sized asteroid and most meteors are far smaller than that, including some that make huge fireballs in the sky.

Did you see that? The largest piece found from a truck-sized rock was only 283 grams, barely over half a pound, a pretty small rock for such a large impactor.

Now look at the terrain in the area under the fireball in 1965 and compare that to the barren wasteland terrain in Africa under the 2008 meteor and you'll see why it was possible to find fragments of the explosion in Africa, but it may be extremely difficult to find any such fragments from the 1965 explosion.

So, don't conclude too much from the fact that they never found any fragments of the fireball associated with the Kecksburg incident, now that you see how difficult that might be.

.

So at the end of this all, and looking at the witness testimonies about it there must have been an object.

Whether it was a soviet space probe, an SR71 engine, an experiment military airplane, an Alien spacecraft, the military would never confirm that because that is what they usually do in UFO/ET cases.

[edit on 17/11/09 by spacevisitor]

[edit on 17/11/09 by spacevisitor]