Mystery holes in roof could be meteorites, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 04:39 PM by smurfy
It could be that some of the Taurids are making it to Meteorite status,

spaceweather.com...

Microbursts can occur in fair weather and are called dry-microbursts, this is an Australian link,
www.weatherzone.com.au...



[edit on 10-11-2009 by smurfy]


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 05:00 PM by MissMegs
On spaceweather for Sat, they say that were Halloween storms:

spaceweather.com...

On Oct. 30th, the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) near Earth tilted south, an orientation that weakens our planet's magnetic defenses against solar wind. Indeed, solar wind poured into Earth's magnetosphere and sparked an early Halloween display over Alaska.

I'm curious if this had any effect.


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 05:07 PM by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by MissMegs
On spaceweather for Sat, they say that were Halloween storms:

spaceweather.com...

On Oct. 30th, the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) near Earth tilted south, an orientation that weakens our planet's magnetic defenses against solar wind. Indeed, solar wind poured into Earth's magnetosphere and sparked an early Halloween display over Alaska.

I'm curious if this had any effect.


Im not sure if they had any bearing at all. I would suspect that its purely a meteorological effect only

I do recall that there was a pretty strong trough or low pressure system to the south, which bought severe weather to Victoria, NSW and also QLD. Obviously that kind of weather is needed for thunderstorms that produce microbursts


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 05:23 PM by Mr Mask
reply to post by Lichter daraus



Look man, if you are just not getting what I am laying down...that is fine. But I really suggest you try harder to get this idea through your head.

You plainly said "this definitely was NOT a microburst" because you have been in "many". and they "do way more damage then this". That was a "factual statement" and it was absolutely wrong. It was so wrong that someone beat me to telling you how wrong you are.

As for this whole "how was I supposed to know about dry bursts", point being "research your answer" before you make a factual statement that could wrongly bring someone down the wrong path...or...just do not make factual statements.

You could have easily used the terminology of "I think" or "in my opinion". But no...you used "surly not" and "this is not".

Now...lets add that the microburst I was in was a "wet microburst"...tons of rain. It did no real damage...two trees went down for the entire town. Now...saying "how was I supposed to know about dry bursts" is irrelevant to the point I am making.

The point is this...you are no expert on microburts (as much as I am not), so unless you do not care about having "zero credibility" in future subjects you may post within...you may want to be a bit more meticulous in your information sharing.

Why?

Because "denying ignorance" should not only be a catch phrase, but also everyone's job on this entire site. Disinfo is a cancer and leads fools down hallways of foolishness.

Make sense? Or are you still going to act as if "making false statements claimed as fact" is ok as long as "you didn't know what you were talking about"?

Sorry man...but it is a serious pet peeve with me. I do not enjoy people making factual statements that are seriously bankrupt on facts.



[edit on 10-11-2009 by Mr Mask]


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 05:45 PM by Lichter daraus
Originally posted by Mr Mask
reply to
post by Lichter daraus



Look man, if you are just not getting what I am laying down...that is fine. But I really suggest you try harder to get this idea through your head.

You plainly said "this definitely was NOT a microburst" because you have been in "many". and they "do way more damage then this". That was a "factual statement" and it was absolutely wrong. It was so wrong that someone beat me to telling you how wrong you are.

As for this whole "how was I supposed to know about dry bursts", point being "research your answer" before you make a factual statement that could wrongly bring someone down the wrong path...or...just do not make factual statements.

You could have easily used the terminology of "I think" or "in my opinion". But no...you used "surly not" and "this is not".

Now...lets add that the microburst I was in was a "wet microburst"...tons of rain. It did no real damage...two trees went down for the entire town. Now...saying "how was I supposed to know about dry bursts" is irrelevant to the point I am making.

The point is this...you are no expert on microburts (as much as I am not), so unless you do not care about having "zero credibility" in future subjects you may post within...you may want to be a bit more meticulous in your information sharing.

Why?

Because "denying ignorance" should not only be a catch phrase, but also everyone's job on this entire site. Disinfo is a cancer and leads fools down hallways of foolishness.

Make sense? Or are you still going to act as if "making false statements claimed as fact" is ok as long as "you didn't know what you were talking about"?

Sorry man...but it is a serious pet peeve with me. I do not enjoy people making factual statements that are seriously bankrupt on facts.



[edit on 10-11-2009 by Mr Mask]



I admitted i was wrong, what more do you want. geez back off already. Maybe if you went about it like Oz did i wouldn't continue on about it. I was explaining my experience that's all, excuse me. So its a pet peev of yours thats fine and dandy but explain it with out offending. I also stated it was fact to ME until i learned differently from Oz.


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 06:01 PM by Mr Mask
reply to post by Lichter daraus



Wait...you were offended? Why? Was I not gentle or something? Is there a "soothing" way to point out a grave error on behalf of ignorance?

*sigh*

I don't get it...ok carry on. I think you got the point and I don't want to derail this thread any further


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 06:06 PM by Lichter daraus
Originally posted by Mr Mask
reply to
post by Lichter daraus



Wait...you were offended? Why? Was I not gentle or something? Is there a "soothing" way to point out a grave error on behalf of ignorance?

*sigh*

I don't get it...ok carry on. I think you got the point and I don't want to derail this thread any further



It was offencive because you were accusing me of spreading disinfo when i wasn't, all i did was state my experience wrong. Yes there is a civil way to tell someone they are wrong. Oz is a perfect example of it, but im done with you...


PEACE!!!
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 11 days ago with 176 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 19 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 7 days ago with 136 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 8 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 12 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 9 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 15 days ago with 75 member flags