Peak Oil means Peak Emissions, with Peak Emissions following the same bell curve as Peak Oil (roughly).

If that is true, why have a Climate treaty at the exact time that emissions are peaking? Because the Copenhagen treaty is not centered on tackling emissions. "Greenhouse gas emissions" is just code for Peak Oil amongst world leaders. (Do Kunstler and Ruppert really believe they know something oil exec's, bankers, big industry, and world leaders don't already know? Man, I really laugh at that naivete...)
Cap and trade, emissions "tax", these things are just to disguise the reality of Peak Oil to the masses (in addition to bringing about the more "effecient" global govt). "Why are we getting less oil every year?" "Because we're taxed to death, we can't afford it."

Obviously, they prefer the illusion of control to the fact that they are not in control. But once global population pressures have been "alleviated", they will still retain control.

Here's some breaking news to knock-over that Peak-Oil fantasy wagon...

Today Monday the 14th of December 2009, Exxon Mobile (EOM)

has just bought out XTO 'cross timbers' for +$41 Billion

it seems that the western Pennsylvania field has a proven, recoverable reserve which will provide another 100 years of fuel.


the new technologies are now able to extract natural gas from what was considered dry, barren rocks, not a year ago.


evidently the whistleblower didn't have inside connections to even sniff this Gi-normous deal...

FYI, thanks