It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dwiggen
ITF, your profound skepticism is matched only by the "ignorance" that you're ranting against. What's wrong with having some belief in something that we might not have the ability to prove?
Good post, nonetheless!
I think though, that some (including ITF) focus too much on the ridiculous cases, and not enough on the pertinent cases.
Originally posted by The Shrike
There was no way that I was going to watch 43 minutes of b.s. by Sparks
Originally posted by Nightvision
I ask that you simply view a few seconds of the below
These are the types of people who give UFOlogy the black eye everyone complains about. How about this guy and this gal produce some evidence not for hundreds of mass abductions but fo just one? I will not hold my breath.
This is sheer nonsense in itself.
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
Here is a point for you. There are no ways to legitimately discuss "pertinent" cases thanks to how clouded they have become due to the nonsense the majority has saddled us with.
I sincerely hope that your attempts to stifle debate within the UFO section of ATS never bear fruit.
But there really are no good, solid cases that amount to anything more than a hill of beans anyway.
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
I mean, you tell someone that the radiation readings on a certain case are completely misleading due to the type of equipment that was used and the range of detection, and they simply ignore that, or call you some sort of paid debunker then go on to keep screaming that a case is "pertinent" when more and more facts examined properly prove them wrong. Yet cases like that only remain "pertinent" in this subject because a lot of ignorant people keep then in the limelight, disregarding anything that makes them look ignorant. The end result is we all look ignorant. How do you combat that?
Originally posted by fleabit
But there really are no good, solid cases that amount to anything more than a hill of beans anyway.
If you believe that, you've hardly done any real UFO research, just saying.
Why don't you just admit you've dismissed ALL cases. That makes you a debunker. Even the Air Force with their disinformation efforts, had SOME cases they listed as "unknown." If you are beyond that, you are in a word, a debunker.