reply to post by truthseeker84
I agree with a lot that you're saying.
If assuming that a kid, or at least someone who thinks like a kid was responsible for the "artwork", then would it make more sense if one viewed
such drawing with a thought process of, say, a four or five-yr.-old child? Instead of thinking like an adult.
I'm not an expert on child psychology, but I'm sure we all know how unpredictable, careferee, and haphazard kids can be. Nobody really knows the
stuff that goes on in their funny little brains. It would be rather pretentious of us adults if we were to act like self-proclaimed "art critics",
if you guys know what I mean...
To be fair, I also used to draw a lot of weird stuff when I was a kid, and my mom even compiled all of it in a picture album. There's one piece of
"art" that I am particularly embarassed about until now, especially when my mom tries to show the album to her friends and visitors (and I am now
30). It's a LOT similar to your drawing, but mine showing one guy taking a piss falling on a daisy. And beside the daisy was "crap" - you know, the
one that twirls like a sundea twirl. And the guy was nude and smiling --- "nude", meaning it showed his male sex organ. As crazy and odd as it
seems, I can still recall why I drew that "artwork" -- I was curious about how other people took a crap and pissed, since I was the only person I
witnessed doing the stuff. So I tried imagining other people doing it, and therefore expressed my curiosity by drawing it on paper --- WHILE
MAKING/HAVING FUN and passing my boredom. I dunno why I included a daisy though, but that's exactly my point -- you can't really understand how kids
think, especially if you're trying to understand and interpret them with just one drawing, and drawing conclusions from it, based on your own adult
way of thinking.
(edit: I still draw weird stuff btw)
[edit on 9-11-2009 by smirnoffsky]