Originally posted by loamThis thread's initial post provides three primary 'facts' deserving of most of the discussion:
1) Tibetan Glaciers are disappearing,
2) More than 1 billion people will likely be affected,
3) The global ramifications could be significant.
Dispute, please, the fact of the ice's disappearance and it's significance to anyone in terms of scale and consequence.
OK.
1. The ice IS disappearing.
2. Its significance is that
a. China and India are poisoning themselves, while;
b. everyone wants to blame the West and CO2 emissions.
3. That has direct impact on the US and its citizens as we are being asked to pay for South Asian ignorance and indifference.
Why do I say this, you may ask?
What you fail to consider, is that while men are able to poison their environment
locally, MAN cannot change the global climate by
himself. (Our entire biomass is less than that of the annual Antarctic krill spawn, or the world-wide population of insects)
Nor is the West responsible for Eastern and Asian self-destruction.
You also seem to think that
developed countries are responsible for the problems long observed in the Tibetan Plateau.
Politically correct? Of course. Popular? Obviously.
True? Absolutely not.
The Chinese and Indians have been dumping their excrement into the environment in huge and increasing volumes, and not only at their own expense, but
(because of the “global implications”) at everyone else’s as well; including those countries (such as the US) that have taken measures to
minimize their “carbon footprint!”
In a new research, scientists in India and China have determined that glaciers in the Himalayas and the Tibetan plateau that feed the river
systems of almost half the world's people are melting faster because of the effects of clouds of soot from diesel fumes and wood fires.
According to a report in the Guardian, the results of the research, to be announced this month in Kashmir, show for the first time that clouds of soot
- made up of tiny particles of "black carbon " emitted from old diesel engines and from cooking with wood, crop waste or cow dung - are
"unequivocally having an impact on glacial melting" in the Himalayas.
Once the black carbon lands on glaciers, it absorbs sunlight that would otherwise be reflected by the snow, leading to melting. "This is a huge
problem which we are ignoring," said Professor Syed Hasnain of the Energy and Resources Institute (Teri) in Delhi. "We are finding concentrations
of black carbon in the Himalayas in what are supposed to be pristine, untouched environments," he added. The institute has set up two sensors in the
Himalayas, one on the Kholai glacier that sits on the mountain range's western flank in Kashmir and the other flowing through the eastern reaches in
Sikkim.
Glaciers in this region feed most of the major rivers in Asia. The short-term result of substantial melting is severe flooding downstream.
Hasnain said that India and China produce about a third of the world's black carbon, and both countries have been slow to act. "India is the
worst. At least in China, the state has moved to measure the problem. In Delhi. no government agency has put any sensors on the ground. Teri is doing
it by ourselves," he said.
Decreasing black carbon emissions should be a relatively cheap way to significantly curb global warming. Black carbon falls from the atmosphere after
just a couple of weeks, and replacing primitive cooking stoves with modern versions that emit far less soot could quickly end the problem.
Controlling traffic in the Himalayan region should help ease the harm done by emissions from diesel engines.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com...
46.cms
Scientists who are not concerned with profiting from “AGW” have been saying this for YEARS!
Since this puts the onus on the real culprits, and diverts attention from the cash generating focus on industrialized countries’ CO2 emissions, no
one wants to discuss it.
Black carbon, a form of particulate air pollution most often produced from biomass burning, cooking with solid fuels and diesel exhaust, has a
warming effect in the atmosphere three to four times greater than prevailing estimates, according to scientists in an upcoming review article in the
journal Nature Geoscience.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego atmospheric scientist V. Ramanathan and University of Iowa chemical engineer Greg Carmichael, said
that soot and other forms of black carbon could have as much as 60 percent of the current global warming effect of carbon dioxide, more than that of
any greenhouse gas besides CO2. The researchers also noted, however, that mitigation would have immediate societal benefits in addition to the long
term effect of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
"Observationally based studies such as ours are converging on the same large magnitude of black carbon heating as modeling studies from Stanford,
Caltech and NASA," said Ramanathan. "We now have to examine if black carbon is also having a large role in the retreat of arctic sea ice and
Himalayan glaciers as suggested by recent studies."
www.sciencedaily.com...
Well, now we know that it does, don’t we?
In fact, the studies proving the LOCAL effect have existed almost for as long as the IPCC, which prefers to concentrate its studies on the greatest
sources of its funding, the EU and US.
New research based on NASA satellite data and a multinational field experiment shows that black carbon aerosol pollution produced by humans can
impact global climate as well as seasonal cycles of rainfall. Because aerosols that contain black carbon both absorb and reflect incoming sunlight,
these particles can exert a regional cooling influence on Earth's surface that is about 3 times greater than the warming effect of greenhouse gases.
But even as these aerosols reduce by as much as 10 percent the amount of sunlight reaching the surface, they increase the solar energy absorbed in the
atmosphere by 50 percent -- thus making it possible to both cool the surface and warm the atmosphere.
Scientists are concerned that this heating may perturb atmospheric circulation and rainfall patterns. Averaged over the entire northern Indian
Ocean, the man-made pollutants reflected more solar radiation back to space (than pristine skies), but they absorbed up to twice as much radiation
in the atmosphere. Data for their investigation were collected during the Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX) -- an international multi-agency
measurement campaign conducted from January through March in the years 1997, 1998 and 1999. As a result of human industry -- automobiles, factories
and burning vegetation -- particles build up in the atmosphere where they are blown southward over most of the tropical Indian Ocean. The
Indo-Asian haze covered an area larger than that of the United States.
www.unisci.com...
Thus, you see that China and India are destroying their local environs.
They are responsible for altering the lives and welfare of their own populations.
The US,and the West generally, are being asked to pay for it.
Oh, and the Chinese and India are united (along with the other BRIC nations) to fight against global CO2 remediation and reduction:
World's Largest Polluters Unite Against "Carbon Schemes."
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So give credit where credit is due: China and India are destroying
their own people and landscapes (
at OUR expense).
Deny ignorance.
jw
[edit on 9-11-2009 by jdub297]