Implications of >900,000 ill in the Ukraine, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 8-11-2009 @ 02:11 AM by apacheman
If we look at the progression of of the epidemic from the 29th to the present we find this, rounded to nearest thousand for ill:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

# ill: 40K- 81K- 165K- 191K- 256K - 478K - 763K- 871K- 937K
#hospitalized: 951- 2341- 5239- 7524- 15,810- 24,003- 33,939- 39,603- 43,762
# dead: 30- 33- 39- 60- 70- 81- 109- 135- 144

By all reports, the form of flu they are experiencing is at least as bad as normal flu, so one could safely estimate that the course of the illness for most will last around two weeks or so. To be conservative let's say 12 days of illness, with 6 more as recovery to full strength. That means there will be at least eight more days of increasing numbers of people getting sick and being sick before the first ones noted here are recovered. If the epidemic progesses at anything like the same rate as it has over the last few days, some 60,000 to 100,000 new cases can be expected per day, if not more, until the virus burns out.

The population of the Ukraine is ~46 million. So at the moment, 1 person in 46 is either ill or recovering, mostly ill, with 1 in about 1,000 seriously so. In a week, it will be somewhere in the neighborhood of 1 in 24. In two weeks, maybe 1 in 20. Hopefully it will burn out by then, and that will be the worst of it.

But what will that do to the country's economy and psyche? How long will it take for them to recover? What will it really mean to have that many people ill all at once?

It bears thinking about, and pondering what would happen if the same ratio applied here in the US. 1 in 46 would mean around 7,000,000 sick all at once, 300,000 seriously so. How well would we cope with that?


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 02:19 AM by spellbound
reply to post by apacheman



S & F.

I can only think about the end times, when the plague is upon us.

I am desperately sorry for all those people.

Jesus, help us please.


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 03:03 AM by apacheman
reply to post by chiron613



The points you make are valid.

But the infection rate shows no signs of diminishing yet, and the epidemic is still incubating the other parts of the Ukraine.

That still doesn't diminish the reality of the current situation. If the numbers are reasonably accurate, it is still really bad, and will likely have ramifications long after it passes.

It won't take long to see the trends.

I saw an estimate by the president of Ukraine to the effect that half the population will eventually be sick. That's pretty extreme, and very hopefully an exaggeration, but it is within the realm of possibility.

My point in bringing this up is to help people to prepare emotionally to deal with what may be coming, because the emotional impact of so much illness is bound to be devasting if you haven't really contemplated it much before it occurs, and especially when compounded by financial distress.


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 04:32 AM by apacheman
reply to post by born yesterday



Yes, as an individual each of us will most likely survive.

That's not the point.

I'm trying to explore the likely social and economic consequences of so many people ill all at once. I'm not talking about mortality rates or the end of the world or anything at all like that.

The numbers currently sick are far beyond what we are used to, and the flu season's barely begun. It's not like you can say "okay, we've filled this year's quota of illness, you can stop getting sick now". We have five more months of flu season to go. To assume that everyone who is likely to get sick already has is foolish. To assume that the worst is over in the Ukraine is doubly foolish: remember they had no vaccines a week ago, and it has undoubtedly spread to the regions lightly hit so far. If they vaccinated everyone tomorrow, it would still be a week before they'd be protected. So we can expect at least another week or two of increasing numbers.

Also remember that few, if any, have any immunity: the total number of sick at one time could reach 20-30% of the entire population. You don't need massive numbers of people to die to have a catastrophe on your hands, massive numbers of sick people, even if they recover eventually can have a disastrous effect upon an economy.

[edit on 8-11-2009 by apacheman]



reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 05:25 AM by HiAliens
reply to post by born yesterday



Wow I didn't know MMS2 had come out... Thanks so much for posting that..

*

To the rest of the posters........... A quick glance at a variety of news sources shows that less than 100 people have died so far and the Ukraine outbreak may have peaked.

As usual... ATSers are blowing this way out of proportion......analysisis good but rampant negative speculation doesn't help anyone.

Yes, I'm sure there's a lot of manipulation going on.



Google: Slippery Slope Fallacy







[edit on 011f20090amSun, 08 Nov 2009 06:28:43 -060043 by HiAliens]


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 12:54 PM by apacheman
I had hoped that folks here would think through this a bit, after all the title does say IMPLICATIONS.

Ok, I guess I'll have to spell it out for you:

Over 900,000 of 46 million are sick, right?

In one region of the Ukraine, right?

They had no vaccines until Wednesday or Thursday, right?

It takes a week for the vaccines to be effective, right?

It'll take at least two days (at least) to get everyone vaccinated, or to run out of vaccines anyway, right?

So that means they are looking at at least nine more days of a highly virulent virus spreading before it begins to be checked, right?

Each sick person will be sick for around 12 days, and take another week or so to fully recover, based on 1st person reoprts here on ATS, right?

Each sick person will require the attention of one or more healthy people, depending upon how sick they are, but at least one to one, right?

So to gauge the economic effects, you have to double the number of sick to account for the diversion of time and energy to tend the sick, right?

That means that an additional 900,000 people, mostly working age adults, are currently diverted from productive economic work.

So, right now, nearly 2 million out of 46 million are not available for economic activity. Deduct children and you're still around 1.2-1.5 million diversions, at this time, will zero increase in caseload. If normal demographics apply here, about half the total population is in the workforce pool.

So that means, that right now some 5% of the entire workforce pool is either sick or treating the sick. If the virus proceeds in the other regions of the Ukraine as it has in the western part, then in another week we can expect at least another 5-15% diversion from the economy before this is over. I see no reason other than wishful thinking to assume it has peaked there.

So what happens to a country's economy under these circumstances? I don't think anyone in modern times has ever experienced this before, please correct me if I'm wrong (with citations, please).

I don't know enough about the patterns of work and production in the Ukraine to give an educated guess. Any economists here who can predict in general? Anyone familiar enough with the Ukraine's economy to know whether things like crops will go unharvested or undone that are time dependant, i.e., do it November or lose the opportunity?

That's what I was asking originally. I know most people will eventually recover, that the dead, while numerous, are not that many in the grand scheme of things, so please don't go there, that's stipulated. I'm looking at the economic consequences of a huge number of sick people at the same time.

Any answers, anyone?

Reasonable speculations?



[edit on 8-11-2009 by apacheman]


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 01:19 PM by apacheman
reply to post by Tomis_Nexis



Didn't I just say I know this isn't an end time scenario? And yes the world has gone through periods similar to this, but not in my lifetime that I'm aware of, and I'm pretty aware.

They are dealing with an extraordinary situation and I'm trying to figure out the consequences of that extraodinary situation. I'm not worried about my personal survival, I expect that the US will handle it better than the Ukraine, that western Europe has better medical systems...all stipulated.

Happy now?

Then please address the subject of the economic effects of 5-20% of a nation's workforce being ill at the same time rather than simply post another "what are you worried about, everything's cool, you'll survive" type comment. They aren't helpful to the discussion unless you provide a few facts with cites as to WHY you take that position.

Has there in fact been another country recently that had that many of its citizens sick at once? Where and when? If we can look at a prior example we can estimate the effects here, however crudely. We can compare economies and health systems and make projections. I'm not currently predicting or projecting anything because I don't have enough data to do so. This thread will help gather that data, I hope.

Now do you understand the questions?


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 04:40 PM by angelx666
Originally posted by apacheman
I had hoped that folks here would think through this a bit, after all the title does say IMPLICATIONS.

Ok, I guess I'll have to spell it out for you:

Over 900,000 of 46 million are sick, right?

In one region of the Ukraine, right?

They had no vaccines until Wednesday or Thursday, right?

It takes a week for the vaccines to be effective, right?

It'll take at least two days (at least) to get everyone vaccinated, or to run out of vaccines anyway, right?

So that means they are looking at at least nine more days of a highly virulent virus spreading before it begins to be checked, right?

Each sick person will be sick for around 12 days, and take another week or so to fully recover, based on 1st person reoprts here on ATS, right?

Each sick person will require the attention of one or more healthy people, depending upon how sick they are, but at least one to one, right?

So to gauge the economic effects, you have to double the number of sick to account for the diversion of time and energy to tend the sick, right?

That means that an additional 900,000 people, mostly working age adults, are currently diverted from productive economic work.

So, right now, nearly 2 million out of 46 million are not available for economic activity. Deduct children and you're still around 1.2-1.5 million diversions, at this time, will zero increase in caseload. If normal demographics apply here, about half the total population is in the workforce pool.

So that means, that right now some 5% of the entire workforce pool is either sick or treating the sick. If the virus proceeds in the other regions of the Ukraine as it has in the western part, then in another week we can expect at least another 5-15% diversion from the economy before this is over. I see no reason other than wishful thinking to assume it has peaked there.

So what happens to a country's economy under these circumstances? I don't think anyone in modern times has ever experienced this before, please correct me if I'm wrong (with citations, please).

I don't know enough about the patterns of work and production in the Ukraine to give an educated guess. Any economists here who can predict in general? Anyone familiar enough with the Ukraine's economy to know whether things like crops will go unharvested or undone that are time dependant, i.e., do it November or lose the opportunity?

That's what I was asking originally. I know most people will eventually recover, that the dead, while numerous, are not that many in the grand scheme of things, so please don't go there, that's stipulated. I'm looking at the economic consequences of a huge number of sick people at the same time.

Any answers, anyone?

Reasonable speculations?



[edit on 8-11-2009 by apacheman]


i bet this swine hypo is some sort of radioactive poisoning, don't you find this interesting - craze in ukraine, but nothing in the neighbouring countries, Ukraine has a log history of democide (remember Chernobyl etc),

they have those all nuclear factories, sure swine flu is radioactive poisoning !!!


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 05:42 PM by Pellevoisin
reply to post by Athin



You are referring to Joseph Moshe (or Moishe) who called into the Dr. Tru Ott radio show -- or something like that -- and said the vaccine being released in Ukraine was a bioweapon ... pneumonic plague plus who knows what. Definitely not simply aH1N1.

If that ratio were applied to Canada, I think we would be close to shutting down the nation with everyone ordered to shelter in place until further notice.

There are more and more whistleblowers trying to come forward and be heard ... that tells me we are close to a doomsday scenario and they have evaluated the risk to themselves against the likely destruction of us all. Perhaps there is a more cheerful assessment that one could make. But there is obviously a risk/threat analysis at work in these various disclosures.


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 06:44 PM by Pellevoisin
reply to post by apacheman



I have no idea what you are talking about. These posts all have contextual elements that are important to fleshing out your OP.

If all you want is a narrow discussion of how this "flu" would relate to your country and its demographics, perhaps you should print a notice saying non-USAmericans are not welcome to post on this thread.


reply posted on 9-11-2009 @ 12:19 PM by apacheman
reply to post by Pellevoisin



What I'm talking about is not conspiracies, but effects: specifically, what are or will be the effect of having up to 20% of your workforce sick or caring for the sick at once. I'm not limiting it to the US, because we're all in the same boat.

I'm trying to figure out what will happen to the various economies as a result of massive illness. So in that context, conspiriacies are peripheral, and the numbers of dead are fairly irrelevant unless they begin to climb enormously.

I'm just being pragmatic about trying to determine economic fallout and how it will play into the world economy, while also trying to be fairly conservative about total numbers sick, dying and dead.

I'm sorry if you misunderstood my position and goals here, I'm trying as hard as I might to be clear about what I'm trying to figure out, looking beyond the epidemic itself and its causes to its economic consequences.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Another Bug, Worse than the Last Bug - Flesh Eater Spreading
  Posted 8 days ago with 20 member flags
Superbugs spied off the Antarctic coast
  Posted 8 days ago with 14 member flags
NYC Employers Now REQUIRE Yearly H1N1 Shot - Or you\'re FIRED!
  Posted 5 days ago with 6 member flags
Bird flu \'censorship\' decision
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
No way of stopping leak of deadly new flu, says terror chief
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
Schmallenberg Virus affects European Livestock
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags
Deadly mosquito virus on rise in Australia
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
CDC: Morgellons Disease May Be Psychiatric Disorder
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags