reply to post by assteroid
The reason this story stood out is because it was surrounded by H1N1 stories.
And I think that was the point of the original reporter.
The media DO have a responsibility to report what they are told to report. But in their attempt to remain "UNBIASED" they forget to use common
sense and see the outcome of what they are told to report. They just keep feeding the panic, and the subjects of the stories know this. They
sometimes use the unbiased reporting as a tool to manipulate how the news is reported.
Perfect example. The WHO (World Health Organization) release only certain things at first. The media has NO choice but to report, "unbiasedly".
So they can sort of control the information in a "staged" panic, to send people running for the shot. Which someone is getting paid to make.
Does this make sense:
"The H1N1 strikes 18-25 year olds hardest. Even healthy ones"
Then report
"Clinics are coming!!"
Then report
"The first people to get the shot aren't the hardest hit, in fact that group will be last to get them"
Then report
"There MAY be a shortage of the vaccine".
Way to feed panic, there media. Not even say, that more people than not ARE recovering from this flu. haha. I don't know. It's all about the
money.
|